Rhinolophus creaghi, Thomas, 1896

Burgin, Connor, 2019, Rhinolophidae, Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 9 Bats, Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, pp. 280-332 : 317

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.3748525

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3809006

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/885887A2-FFE9-8A0F-FF53-FEFDFE63D66D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rhinolophus creaghi
status

 

75 View On . Creagh’s Horseshoe Bat

Rhinolophus creaghi View in CoL

French: Rhinolophe de Creagh / German: Creagh-Hufeisennase / Spanish: Herradura de Creagh

Taxonomy. Rhinolophus creaghi Thomas, 1896 View in CoL ,

Sandakan, British N[orth]. Borneo [= Borneo], ” Malaysia .

Rhinolophus creaghi is included in the euryotis species group, along with R. canuti , R. mcintyrei , R. euryotis , R. tatar , R. belligerator , R. proconsulis , R. arcuatus , R. inops , R.subrufus , R.rufus , R affinis , R.andamanensis , R. coelophyllus , R. shameli , R. microglobosus , and R. stheno . The euryotis group is currendy not well defined and includes a number of taxa that have typically been placed in other species groups (particularly the megaphyllus group). The current arrangement is based mainly on genetic data, but further sampling is needed to achieve a better understanding of the relationships of the species within this group. Current genetic data indicate that the euryotis group is probably either close to the pearsonii , trifoliatus , hipposideros , and rouxii groups, or is sister to a clade including the pusillus , megaphyllus , philippinensis , and macrotis groups, but genetic data are still limited. Genetic data have placed. creaghi close to R. affinis , R shameli , R arcuatus , and R subrufus . Two subspecies recognized.

Subspecies and Distribution.

R c. creaghi Thomas, 1896 - Palawan I ( Philippines) and N, W & E Borneo (including Banggi I), although it probably occurs more widely in Borneo.

. c. pilosus K. Andersen, 1918 — Lesser Sunda Is (Madura, Nusa Penida, Flores, Semau, and Roti), View Figure

Descriptive notes. Head-body 51 mm (holotype), tail 11- 1-16 mm, ear 18- 8-25 mm, forearm 46-54- 4 mm; weight 10-5—13- 5 g. Dorsal pelage is generally dark brown to olive brown, and ventral pelage is paler. Ears are small to medium-sized. Noseleaf has a relatively long lancet with slightly concave sides; connecting process is virtually absent but there is a distinctive tuft of compact, dense hair at base of the lancet (hairs are long and dark brown, and in pilosus they are modified with their distal halves being flattened into a blade-like structure); sella has constricted base at narial cup and is more or less ellipsoid in outline above; horseshoe is moderately wide (9-8—11- 4 mm) and has poorly developed secondary leaflets. Lower lip has three mental grooves. Skull is heavily built (zygomatic breadth is slightly greater than or subequal to mastoid breadth); anterior median swellings are high and bulbous; lateral swellings are well developed; posterior compartments are not well developed; rostral profile is distinctly concave; sagittal crest is moderately to well developed; frontal depression is deep; supraorbital crests are prominent and often have sharp ridges. C1 is moderately strong but low; P 2 is well developed and slightly extruded from tooth row; P3 is minute and fully extruded from tooth row or completely absent; P2 and P4 are in contact. Dental formula is the usual of 32 teeth for genus, or only 30 teeth when lower premolar is missing. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 62 and FNa = 60 (Sabah, northern Borneo).

Habitat. Mostly primary forest in both lowland and highland regions. On Palawan, common in primary lowland forest from near sea level up to at least 700 m; can occur up to 1500 m elsewhere in its distribution.

Food and Feeding. No information.

Breeding. Eight pregnant females (out of 135 total females captured) were reported in December on Palawan.

Activity patterns. Creagh’s Horseshoe Bat roosts in caves. A call frequency of 68 kHz was recorded from a hand-held individual in Sabah.

Movements, Home range and Social organization. Creagh’s Horseshoe Bats often roost in large numbers, with colonies of hundreds or thousands.

Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on 77 ze IUCN ed List. Creagh’s Horseshoe Bat has a widespread, although somewhat scattered, distribution and is considered locally common in parts of its range. It may be locally threatened by roost disturbance from limestone extraction and guano mining, and by general habitat destruction by deforestation. It is hunted for food on Palawan, although this is not viewed as a substantial threat.

Bibliography. Csorba eta/. (2003), Esselstyn, Widmann & Heaney (2004), Harada & Kobayashi (1980), Hill (1958, 1959), Hutson, Kingston, Esselstyn & Maryanto (2008), Ketol eta /. (2005), Payne eta /. (1985), Phillipps & Phillipps (2016), Rahman & Abdullah (2002), Sazali eta/. (2011), Struebig et al. (2012), Suyanto (1998), Yasuma (1994), Zhang Lin eta/. (2018).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Chiroptera

Family

Rhinolophidae

Genus

Rhinolophus

Loc

Rhinolophus creaghi

Burgin, Connor 2019
2019
Loc

Rhinolophus creaghi

Thomas 1896
1896
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF