Acrapex kafula Le Ru, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.270 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7E8B1A8F-48C1-433B-A34E-A95CDDE3D13F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5633267 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B727D00A-7E31-4B44-9B33-E6DC82D548B2 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:B727D00A-7E31-4B44-9B33-E6DC82D548B2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acrapex kafula Le Ru |
status |
sp. nov. |
Acrapex kafula Le Ru sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B727D00A-7E31-4B44-9B33-E6DC82D548B2
Figs 1G–J View Fig. 1 , 2B, J View Fig. 2 , 3B View Fig. 3
Diagnosis
Male easily separated from males of other species of the group by the shovel-shaped uncus (at the apex) and the distal part of the aedeagus (grooved-shaped), with the vesica having a basal tuft of needleshaped cornutus, pointed downward ( Fig. 2B, J View Fig. 2 ). Female easily separated from females of other species of the group by the very short ductus bursae, with a strongly sclerotised funnel-shaped connection with the ostium; antrum sclerotized, with a large, broad ventral plate, slightly bilobate, widening to the front, the anterior part shaped like a thin lip and more sclerotized than the posterior part, slightly concave ( Fig. 3B View Fig. 3 ).
Etymology
Named after the village of Kafulo in Zambia.
Type material
Holotype
ZAMBIA: ♂, Western Province, Kafulo, 14°08.726' S, 23°27.638' E, 1056 m a.s.l., 20 Mar. 2012, ex light trap, B. Le Ru leg. (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G595).
Paratypes
CAMEROON: 1 ♀, Central Region, Sanaga River, 04°22.387' N, 11°15.162' E, 388 m a.s.l., Dec. 2013, ex light trap (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G603).
KENYA: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, Nyanza Province, edge of Ruma Park, 00°36.293' S, 34°16.046' E, 1221 m a.s.l., 14 Nov. 2012, ex light trap, B. Le Ru leg. (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G511-G513-G529); 1 ♂, Central Province, Ruiru Aukland, 01°05.063' S, 36°55.621' E, 1595 m a.s.l., Jun. 2011 (MNHN).
REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO: 1 ♂, Plateau Region, Lefni River, 02°54.501' S, 15°37.776' E, 320 m a.s.l., 13 Apr. 2013, ex light trap (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G584).
TANZANIA: 1 ♂, Iringa Region, Lukumburu, 09°40.048' S, 35°16.892' E, 1299 m a.s.l., 17 Apr. 2015, ex light trap, B. Le Ru leg. (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G799).
UGANDA: 2 ♂♂, Western Region, Itojo, 00°50.546' N, 30°13.131' E, 1070 m a.s.l., 22 May 2014, ex light trap (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G714).
ZAMBIA: 1 ♂, same date and locality as holotype, ex. light trap, B. Le Ru leg. (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G178); 1 ♀, same date and locality as holotype, ex light trap (MNHN, gen. prep. LERU Bruno/G165).
Description
Both sexes look similar; however, general shape of female fore wing more elongated at apex than in male and fore wings paler in females ( Fig. 1G–J View Fig. 1 ); antennae bright fuscous dorsally and ochreous ventrally, fliform in female and slightly ciliate in male; fagellum adorned dorsally with black scales, palpus cupreous brown, eyes fuscous. Head and base of thorax brown, thorax becoming gradually fuscous; legs brown-ringed with buff, buff on inner surface; abdomen fuscous, irrorated with buff scales.
FORE WING. Ground colour ochreous in both sexes, suffused with fuscous scales, more heavily along veins and costal area, particularly in males; reniform indicated by a few white scales, preceded by some brown scales; longitudinal brown median fascia along lower external margin of cell, ending obliquely at apex; veins below cell adorned with white, fuscous and brown scales; postmedial row of white spots on veins; row of black elongated spots between veins on margin; fringe whitish externally, fuscous suffused with brown internally. Underside of fore wing with ground colour fuscous, densely suffused with brown scales.
HIND WING. Ground colour white, veins slightly irrorated, with fuscous scales, costa and apex more heavily suffused with fuscous scales; hind wing of males much more suffused with fuscous scales than in females; fringe white, suffused with fuscous and adorned with narrow fuscous line. Underside of hind wing white, suffused with fuscous scales but much more heavily on costa and apex; veins slightly irrorated, with fuscous scales.
WINGSPAN. 18–22 mm (6 ♂♂); 21–25 mm (5 ♀♀).
MALE GENITALIA ( Fig. 2B, J View Fig. 2 ). Uncus long, widening in distal third, shovel-shaped at apex, tufted with long hairs on upper side. Tegumen with medium-sized rounded penniculi, vinculum pointed, with mediumsized triangular saccus, valves short and broad, cucullus rounded and tufted with medium-sized hairs, coastal margin slightly broadened on inner side and produced into strong, tooth-shaped spine, strongly sclerotized at apex, pointed and slightly curved inwardly; juxta large, plate-like, without sclerotisation. Aedeagus short, slightly curved, with two lateral areas adorned with short setae; hand-shaped vesica with basal tuft of needle-shaped cornutus, pointed downward.
FEMALE GENITALIA ( Fig. 3B View Fig. 3 ). Corpus bursae elongated ovoid and globular without signa; ductus bursae very short, with strongly sclerotised, funnel-shaped connection with ostium; antrum sclerotized, with large, broad ventral plate, slightly bilobate, widening to the front, anterior part shaped like a thin lip, more sclerotized than posterior part, slightly concave; dorsal plate small, weakly sclerotized. Ovipositor lobes relatively short (2.2 times as long as wide), with pointed apex, dorsal surface bearing numerous short and stout setae.
Bionomics
Biology unknown. The moths were caught in a light trap in grasslands near marshes.
Distribution
Cameroon,Kenya,theRepublicoftheCongo,Tanzania,UgandaandZambia.Mothswerefoundinamosaic of lowland rainforest and secondary grassland (Mosaic #11), in a mosaic of Zambezian dry evergreen forest and wetter miombo woodland (Mosaic #21), in a mosaic of East African evergreen bushland and secondaryAcacia wooded grassland (Mosaic #45) and in undiffentiated montane vegetation (Mosaic #19) ( White 1983) ( Fig. 4 View Fig. 4 ), belonging to the Congolian and Zambezian bioregions ( Linder et al. 2012) ( Fig. 5 View Fig. 5 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |