Diaporthe hainanensis Q. Yang, 2024
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.102.113412 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/83930BD8-3D80-589A-999F-7AE9D5CBC803 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Diaporthe hainanensis Q. Yang |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diaporthe hainanensis Q. Yang sp. nov.
Fig. 2 View Figure 2
Diagnosis.
Distinguished from D. cercidis in narrower alpha conidia; from D. guangxiensis in shorter beta conidia.
Etymology.
In reference to the Hainan Province, from where the fungus was first collected.
Description.
Asexual morph: Conidiomata on PNA pycnidial, globose or rostrated, black, erumpent in tissue, erumpent at maturity, 450-600 μm diam., often with pale yellowish conidial drops exuding from the ostioles. Conidiophores reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells (10.5-)14.5-20(-21.5) × 1.4-1.8 μm (n = 30), aseptate, cylindrical, phialidic, straight or slightly curved. Alpha conidia (5.5-)7-8(-8.5) × 2.1-2.9 μm (n = 30), aseptate, hyaline, ellipsoidal, biguttulate. Beta conidia (21.5-)23-25 × 1.1 µm (n = 30), hyaline, aseptate, filiform, sinuous at one end, eguttulate.
Culture characters.
Culture incubated on PNA at 25 °C, originally white, fluffy aerial mycelium, becoming pale yellow with age, with visible solitary conidiomata pine needles after 15 days.
Specimens examined.
China. Hainan Province: Chengmai County, on leaves of Camellia oleifera , 19°34'10"N, 110°18'09"E, 25 July 2022, Q. Yang (holotype CSUFT055; ex-type living culture: HNCM049; other living cultures: HNCM050, HNCM051 and HNCM052) GoogleMaps .
Notes.
Four isolates representing D. hainanensis cluster in a well-supported clade (ML/BI = 100/1) and appear most closely related to D. cercidis on Cercis chinensis and D. guangxiensis on Macadamia sp. Diaporthe hainanensis can be distinguished from D. cercidis , based on ITS, his3, tef1 and tub2 loci (13/458 in ITS, 5/455 in his3, 33/341 in tef1 and 5/401 in tub2); from D. guangxiensis , based on ITS, tef1 and tub2 loci (5/457 in ITS, 2/339 in tef1 and 16/403 in tub2). Morphologically, D. hainanensis differs from D. cercidis in narrower alpha conidia (2.1-2.9 μm vs. 3-3.5 μm) ( Yang et al. 2018); from D. guangxiensis in shorter beta conidia (23-25 μm vs. 20-32 μm) ( Manawasinghe et al. 2019).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |