Phthinia oliveirae Fitzgerald
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4231.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1388EE72-6241-48A4-A3D1-F555083FD1BA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6048765 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8370A17B-FFBE-5845-E18A-FF2934A8F999 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phthinia oliveirae Fitzgerald |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phthinia oliveirae Fitzgerald View in CoL n. sp.
Figs. 3–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4
Type material. Holotype: ♂ missing terminal flagellomeres of left antenna, glued directly to side of pin [ CNCI], “ Puerto Cisnes , Aysén, CHILE, 15–28.II.61 ” / “ L. E. Pena ” / “ HOLOTYPE, Phthinia oliveirae Fitzgerald ” [red label], terminalia dissected.
Diagnosis. Phthinia oliveirae can be distinguished from other Phthinia species by the following combination of characters: Sc long, reaching level of Rs distally; gonocoxite with a single distal (posterior) projection ( Figs. 3– 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ); gonostylus elongate, parallelogram-like, apically bifurcate, with apical anteriorly directed point visible in both dorsal and ventral view ( Figs. 3–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ), and black, posteriorly directed, apically acute tooth visible only in ventral view ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ).
Description. Male. Body length: [approx. 5.0 mm] (n=1). Coloration. Light brown; abdomen and head slightly darker. Head. Ocelli not visible due to orientation of head/antennae. Fourteen elongate flagellomeres; first flagellomere longer, approx. 1.2 times the length of flagellomere 2. Thorax. Laterotergite bare. Scutellum with numerous short setae and 4 longer, stronger setae (the apical two longest and strongest). Legs. First tarsomere of foreleg approx. 2.1 times length of foretibia. Hind tibia with 1–2 minute anterior setae, 22–23 minute dorsal setae, and 4 minute posterior setae (n=1); Wings. [approx. 4.0 mm] (n=1). Membrane with macrotrichia; microtrichia also present between more widely spaced macrotrichia. Sc long; reaching level of Rs distally. C extending about 1/3 of the distance between Rs and M1; base of Rs just under 1/2 length r-m; r-m slightly shorter than stem of M; most of M1 weakly sclerotized and unpigmented (recognizable by crease and row of minute closely set setae present on other veins). A1 diverging only slightly from stem of CuA. Abdomen. Terminalia ( Figs. 3–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). Terminalia concolorous with abdomen. Cerci short, lobate, apically rounded, with small setae. Hypoproct short, medially divided and cerci-like, narrowly rounded and densely setose apically. Gonocoxites ventrally partially subdivided by pair of sutures level with posteroventral border of ventromedially fused gonocoxites, thus forming gonocoxal subdivisions “Section 1” and “Section 2” as noted by Söli (1997) in some mycetophilids ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). In dorsal and ventral views gonocoxites developed posteriorly beyond point of dorsal articulation of gonostylus into an apical, posteriorly-directed, medially-curved, digitate, setose lobe ( Figs. 3–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). In dorsal view, gonocoxites with a small, narrow, dorsomedially-curved, black-tipped, spine arising on small rounded lobe just dorsal to articulation point of gonostylus and a larger, short, stout, broad, black, medially-directed tooth arising on the median surface of the gonocoxite just anterior to the articulation point of gonostlyus ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). Gonostylus elongate, parallelogram-like, apically bifurcate, with apical anteriorly directed point visible in both dorsal and ventral view ( Figs. 3–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ), and black, posteriorly directed, apically acute tooth visible only in ventral view ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). Parameres a pair of thin, weakly-sclerotized, elongate, apically rounded, slightly divergent lobes ventral to hypoproct. Ventral to parameres, aedeagal complex subquadrate. Posterolateral edges of epandrium (T9) broadly rounded, without strong posteriorly-directed digitate lobes; sclerite relatively short with broad U-shaped posterior margin ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ).
Female. Unknown.
Comments. Phthinia oliveirae is most similar to P. furcata Freeman and will key to this species in the key to Neotropical Phthinia in Oliveira & Amorim (2010) , but can be distinguished by the differences in the structure of the gonostylus. The gonostylus of P. furcata is simple, digitate, apically rounded ( Freeman 1951, fig. 108), whereas the gonostylus of P. oliveira is stouter, parallelogram-like, apically bifurcate.
Etymology. The specific epithet honors Sarah Siqueira Oliveira for her contributions to our knowledge of Neotropical Sciaroidea.
CNCI |
Canadian National Collection Insects |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |