Pristiphora pusilla Malaise, 1921
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9162 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3D68EDB-9CF8-44A3-BC43-E9C2D6626BD7 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/833AD041-8E3D-6FF5-6125-4FE2960AEACB |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pristiphora pusilla Malaise, 1921 |
status |
|
Pristiphora pusilla Malaise, 1921
Pristiphora pusilla Malaise, 1921: 11-12. Lectotype ♂ (NHRS-HEVA000004942; here designated) in NHRS, examined. Type locality: Torne Träsk, Torne Lapp mark, Sweden. Note. In the original description, Malaise (1921) mentioned one female and three males collected from Torne Träsk, but only three specimens (a female and two males) probably belonging to the syntype series were found in NHRS. Among these three specimens, only the female carries the labels “Typus” and " Pristiphora pusilla n. sp." in addition to a locality label "Torne Tr. Malaise ", the two males having originally only the identical locality label "Torne Tr. Malaise " (both males have in addition the label " Pristiphora pusilla Mal. Det: A. Haris 2003" and one of them also apparently relatively recent hand written label "Prist. Pristiphora pusilla "). According to Hege Vårdal (NHRS) there were no other males from Torne Träsk among P. pusilla in the collection and therefore we consider these males as part of the syntype series. Because the female specimen turned out to belong to P. staudingeri (Ruthe, 1859) and in order to preserve the concept of P. pusilla as established by Lindqvist (1953) (who also examined one of the male syntypes), and because separation of males from similar species is more reliable thanks to distinct penis valves, we decided to select one of the males as the lectotype.
Pristiphora amaura Lindqvist, 1955: 43-45. Holotype ♀ (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5205) in MZH, examined. Type locality: Kangasala, Pirkanmaa, Finland. Note. The male paratype of P. amaura (http://id.luomus.fi/GL.5206) (Fig. 96 View Figures 87–96 ) was misidentified and belongs to P. opaca Lindqvist, 1955 instead.
Similar species.
Based on the external morphology, the most similar species are P. albitibia , P. astragali , P. confusa , P. opaca , P. sootryeni , P. staudingeri , and P. subopaca . The species is best distinguished through the structure of male penis valve (Figs 93-94 View Figures 87–96 ) and female lancet (Fig. 72 View Figures 70–72 ). In females, the lack of small spiny pectines (or dentes semicirculares) on the inner surface of the lancet and weakly developed ctenidia, distinguish it from other similar species. Male penis valves are asymmetric (confirmed for six specimens), the left one (Fig. 93 View Figures 87–96 ) having a noticeably stronger dorsal depression in the middle of pseudoceps and a more strongly bent ventro-apical spine than the right one (Fig. 94 View Figures 87–96 ). The most similar penis valves are those of P. subopaca (Figs 91-92 View Figures 87–96 ), which have a less distinct dorsal depression in the middle of pseudoceps and a less strongly bent ventro-apical spine, but this difference is clear only when compared to the left penis valve of P. pusilla . Externally, P. pusilla might be distinguished from P. subopaca by having ventrally paler antennae (uniformly black in P. subopaca ; Fig. 24 View Figures 18–36 ), which is more evident in males (Fig. 36 View Figures 18–36 ).
Genetic data.
Based on COI barcode sequences, P. pusilla belongs to the same BIN cluster (BOLD:AAG3568) as P. aphantoneura , P. bifida , P. confusa , P. opaca , P. staudingeri , and P. subopaca (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ). The nearest neighbour (BOLD:AAQ2302, P. armata and P. leucopus ) is 2.76% different. Two available nuclear TPI sequences are identical and distinguishable from other species (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ).
Host plants.
Unknown.
Distribution and material examined.
Western Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pristiphora pusilla Malaise, 1921
Prous, Marko, Vikberg, Veli, Liston, Andrew & Kramp, Katja 2016 |
Pristiphora amaura
Lindqvist 1955 |
Pristiphora pusilla
Malaise 1921 |
Pristiphora pusilla
Malaise 1921 |
Pristiphora pusilla
Malaise 1921 |
Pristiphora pusilla
Malaise 1921 |