Pseudocrepidobothrium ludovici, Ruedi & Chambrier & P.O. & Ch-, 2012

Ruedi, Virginie & De Chambrier, Alain, 2012, Pseudocrepidobothrium ludovici sp. n. (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidea), a parasite of Phractocephalus hemioliopterus (Pisces: Pimelodidae) from Brazilian Amazon, Revue suisse de Zoologie 119 (1), pp. 137-147 : 138-141

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5962/bhl.part.150326

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6303286

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/805D2E27-C23D-FFF8-759D-588308A4F9DF

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Pseudocrepidobothrium ludovici
status

sp. nov.

Pseudocrepidobothrium ludovici sp. n.

Figs 1-16 View FIGS View FIGS View FIGS

TYPE MATERIAL: Holotype MHNG INVE 22003 , 1 View Materials whole mounted slide, field number Br 334. GoogleMaps – 29 paratypes MHNG INVE 22000 , 22108 View Materials , 30531-32 View Materials , 79281-85 View Materials , 79302 View Materials , 79306-20 View Materials , 79327 View Materials , 79335 View Materials , 79340-41 View Materials . GoogleMaps – 2 paratypes IPCAS C-610 , field number Br 785, Br 649 3/5z; GoogleMaps 1 paratype NHMUK 2012.1.23. 1, field number Br 785. GoogleMaps

OTHER MATERIAL: From Itacoatiara, Amazon River , Amazonas Province, Brazil; collected 15-17.09.1992; MHNG INVE 22001 , 22003 View Materials , 22016 View Materials , 79281-85 View Materials , 79305 View Materials . – Same locality as in previous series, collected 01-18.10.1995: MHNG INVE 22000 , 22047 View Materials , 22103 View Materials , 22108 View Materials , 25600 View Materials , 25610 View Materials , 27437 View Materials , 28298 View Materials , 30531-32 View Materials , 31199 View Materials , 35186 View Materials , 79302-04 View Materials , 79306-20 View Materials , 79327 View Materials , 79333 View Materials , 79335 View Materials , 79337-42 View Materials , 79345 View Materials , 79349-50 View Materials , 79354 View Materials , 79356 View Materials , 79360 View Materials , 79363-64 View Materials , 79388 View Materials ; NHMUK 2012.1.12. 1; IPCAS No C-610 ( Br 695z paratypes, cross section; Br 649 3/5 & Br 804, Br 804a), MACN No. 520/1-3 (Br 649 3/5y).

TYPE LOCALITY: Itacoatiara, Amazon River   GoogleMaps , Amazonas Province, Brazil, 17.09.1992. 03.1536°S 58.4382°W, Field number Br 334, A. de Chambrier & A. A. Rego leg.

DESCRIPTION (BASED ON 32 ENTIRE SPECIMENS): Proteocephalidae , Proteocephalinae. Small-sized worm, 7-23 mm long, up to 1150 wide, flattened dorsoventrally. Strobila acraspedote, anapolytic, bearing 20-36 proglottides in total, 9- 22 immature, 1-6 mature, 3-19 gravid. Proliferation zone posterior to scolex short, up to 620 long and 283-765 wide. Immature and mature proglottides wider than long; pregravid proglottides wider than long, then longer than wide and gravid proglottides longer than wide. Some abnormal proglottides (e.g. with hypertrophy of vitelline follicles) were not considered in this study.

Scolex massive, round, 515-1020 in diameter (x = 775, n = 23) ( Figs 1-4 View FIGS , 7 View FIGS ), clearly separated from strobila. Apical tegumental folds present ( Figs 2, 4 View FIGS ). Four heartshaped suckers, with notched posterior margin, disposed dorsally and ventrally by pairs, 230-385 (x = 290; n = 12) in diameter ( Fig. 5 View FIGS ). Apical organ absent. Scolex usually rectangle-shaped in apical view. Surface of scolex uniformly covered with capilliform filitriches ( Fig. 6 View FIGS ).

Internal longitudinal musculature weakly developed ( Figs 13, 14 View FIGS ) forming small anastomosed bundles of muscular fibers. Osmoregulatory canals usually situated between vitellaria and testes. Ventral canals about 35 in diameter with a secondary canal situated posteriorly near lateral margin and which seems to end at ventral surface ( Fig. 8 View FIGS ). Dorsal osmoregulatory canals about 15 in diameter, sometimes anastomosed or double.

Testes medullary, spherical to oval, 50-95 by 25-85 in diameter, numbering 37-79 (x = 55, n = 37, CV = 19%), in one (rarely two) layer, in two lateral fields ( Figs 8-10 View FIGS , 13 View FIGS ), usually connected with some testes anteriorly; testes degenerated in last gravid proglottides. Vas deferens coiled, very thin-walled, reaching to midline of proglottis, rarely overlapping it ( Fig. 8 View FIGS ). Cirrus-sac elongate to piriform, thin-walled, 155-260 long and 65-125 wide, representing 25-35% (x = 30%, n = 30, CV = 9%) of proglottis width. Cirrus occupying 35-57% (n = 26) of cirrus-sac length ( Fig. 11 View FIGS ).

Genital ducts passing between osmoregulatory canals. Genital atrium present. Genital pores irregularly alternating, situated at 15-29% (x = 22%, n = 28, CV = 14%) of proglottis length.

Vagina posterior (in 53% of proglottides) or anterior (in 47% of proglottides, n = 112) to cirrus-sac, in proximal part lined with chromophil cells. Muscular terminal sphincter present ( Fig. 11 View FIGS ). Mehlis’ glands 35-100 in diameter, representing 6-14% of proglottis width.

Ovary medullary, bilobed, butterfly-shaped in gravid proglottides, 310-565 wide, occupying 53-67% (x = 59%, n = 30, CV = 6%) of proglottis width ( Figs 8-10 View FIGS , 14 View FIGS ).

Vitelline follicles medullary and paramuscular (according to de Chambrier, 1990), oval to elongate, small, in two lateral fields, absent in preporal area, occupying porally 63-78% (x = 69%; n = 16) and aporally 75-95% (x = 84%; n = 17) ( Figs 8-10 View FIGS , 13, 14 View FIGS ).

Anlage of uterus medullary, already present in immature proglottides. Uterus with 14-20 very short lateral diverticula on each side ( Fig. 12 View FIGS ). Formation of uterus of type 1 according to de Chambrier et al. (2004a): uterine stem with tubular concentration of numerous intensely staining cells and with lumen in last immature and first mature proglottides ( Figs 8, 9 View FIGS , 13, 14 View FIGS ). In mature proglottides, thin-walled lateral diverticula appear. In pregravid proglottides, eggs filling uterine stem and diverticula. In gravid proglottides, uterus sometimes opening precociously ventrally by one longitudinal aperture and sometimes conserving eggs up to last proglottis. In last proglottides, uterus occupies up to 71% of proglottis width ( Fig. 11 View FIGS )

Eggs spherical, with thin, hyaline outer envelope, up to 60 in diameter; inner envelope consisting in two-layered embryophore, with external thick layer, 17 in diameter, and nucleate irregular envelope, 12-14 in diameter; oncospheres 8-9 in diameter, with 3 pairs of embryonic hooks, 5-6 long ( Figs 15, 16 View FIGS ).

TYPE-HOST: Phractocephalus hemioliopterus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) , ( Siluriformes : Pimelodidae ).

SITE OF INFECTION: From anterior to middle of the intestine.

PREVALENCE: 12/29 (41%) in Brazil, 0/11 (0%) in Peru.

ETYMOLOGY: The new species is named in honour of Ludovic Ruedi, brother of the first author.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: The present species is placed in Pseudocrepidobothrium Rego and Ivanov, 2001 (Proteocephalinae) because of the medullary position of the genital organs, the medullary and paramuscular position of vitellaria and the heart-shaped structure of suckers ( Freze, 1965; Schmidt, 1986; Rego and Ivanov, 2001).

The present species differs from Pseudocrepidobothrium eirasi , the only other species known in that genus, by the following characters: absence of appendix at the ventral posterior edge of each side of the proglottis, absence of a polar structure on the egg, number of testes (37-79, x = 55 in P. ludovici versus 21-51, x = 32), the disposition of vitelline follicles (more numerous posteriorly in P. eirasi ) the number of segments (20-36 in P. ludovici versus 7-12 for P. eirasi ) and the shape of the scolex (which is usually rectangular in apical view in P. ludovici and square in apical view in P. eirasi , see Fig. 2 View FIGS in the present paper, and Fig. 9 View FIGS in Rego and Ivanov, 2001).

In a recent paper ( de Chambrier et al., 2004a, Fig. 1 View FIGS ), the genus Pseudocrepidobothrium , including by P. eirasi and Pseudocrepidobothrium sp. (= P. ludovici sp. n.) represented a natural taxon, because the 28S sequences data strongly supported a close relationship between both species. In a forthcoming paper dealing with molecular reconstructions, both species also represent a monophyletic group (unpublished data).

MHNG

Museum d'Histoire Naturelle

NHMUK

Natural History Museum, London

MACN

Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF