Phytoseius, Ribaga, 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5068.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:13A38BE1-F138-4F8E-936E-F1DAF09EC01B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5707807 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D6487FF-FFD1-FFCD-2FD1-37A5C2C8459E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2021-11-17 07:01:26, last updated 2024-11-29 19:17:28) |
scientific name |
Phytoseius |
status |
|
Key to the species of Phytoseius View in CoL View at ENA described or reported from India.
1. Setae J2 and R1 present................................................................................ 2
- Setae J2 absent and R1 present or absent................................................................... 3
2. Dorsal shield with a distinct notch at the level s4........................................... P. kapuri Gupta, 1969 View in CoL
- Dorsal shield without a distinct notch at the level s4......................... P. minutus Narayanan, Kaur & Ghai, 1960 View in CoL
3. Seta J2 and R1 absent.................................................................................. 4
- Seta J2 absent and R1 present................................................... P. namdaphaensis Gupta, 1986 View in CoL
4. Setae s4 longer than s6................................................................................. 5
– Setae s4 shorter or equal to s6.......................................................................... 19
5. j3 longer than j1...................................................................................... 6
- j3 not longer than j1.................................................................................. 16
6. Setae z2 and z4 serrated............................................................. P. mixtus Chaudhri, 1973 View in CoL
- Setae z2 and z4 smooth................................................................................. 7
7. Z5 longer than Z4................................................................ P. domesticus Rather, 1985 View in CoL
- Z5 shorter or equal to Z4............................................................................... 8
8. Z5 shorter than Z4..................................................................................... 9
- Z5 not shorter than Z4................................................................................. 13
9. Spermatheca poccular, dorsum with spine like structure................... P. dorsospinosus Pramanik & Karmakar, 2016
- Spermatheca tubular or bell-shaped, dorsum rugose......................................................... 10
10. Genu IV without distinct macrosetae................................................. P. wainsteini Gupta, 1981b View in CoL
- Genu IV with distinct macrosetae....................................................................... 11
11. Macrosetae of leg IV rod-like........................................................................... 12
- Macrosetae of leg IV spatulated with hyaline cap................................ P. crinitus Swirski & Shechter, 1961 View in CoL
12. Seta s4 longer 129–141, macrosetae on genu IV shorter 15–20............................ P. corniger Wainstein, 1959 View in CoL
- Seta s4 shorter 93–112, macrosetae on genu IV longer 25–35.................. P. neoferox Ehara & Bhandhufalck, 1977 View in CoL
13. Leg IV with three macrosetae....................................................... P. macropilis ( Banks, 1909) View in CoL
- Leg IV with two macrosetae............................................................................ 14
14. Seta j3 longer than r3............................................................ P. neocorniger Gupta, 1977b View in CoL
- Seta j3 shorter or equal to r3........................................................................... 15
15. Macrosetae of leg IV with blunt tip..................................................... P. jujuba Gupta, 1977b View in CoL
- Macrosetae of leg IV with clavate tip.................................................... P. roseus Gupta, 1969b View in CoL
16. Dorsal shield rugose.................................................................................. 17
- Doral shield not rugose......................................................... P. bandipurensis Gupta, 1980b View in CoL
17. Setae s4, Z4, s6 and Z5 with longitudinal groove................................................ P. aonlae sp. nov.
- Setae s4, Z4, s6 and Z5 without longitudinal groove......................................................... 18
18. Setae Z4 and Z5 almost equal in length and spermatheca fundibular................ P. rachelae Swirski & Shechter, 1961 View in CoL
- Seta Z4 longer than Z5 and spermatheca tubular...................................... P. maldahaensis Gupta, 1992 View in CoL
19. s4 shorter than s6.................................................................................... 20
- s4 not shorter than s6................................................................................. 22
20. Macrosetae on leg IV present........................................................................... 21
- Macrosetae on leg IV absent........................................... P. intermedius Evans & Macfarlane, 1962 View in CoL
21. Macrosetae of leg IV with clavate tip and seta J5 smooth................................... P. meyerae Gupta, 1977d View in CoL
- Macrosetae of Leg IV with blunt tip and seta J5 serrated......................................... P. clavus sp. nov.
22. Genu of leg IV without macrosetae...................................................................... 23
- Genu of leg IV with macrosetae......................................................................... 24
23. j1 shorter than j3 and seta z4 serrated.............................................. P. macrosetosus Gupta, 1977b View in CoL
- j1 not shorter than j3 and seta z4 smooth............................................... P. nipponicus Ehara, 1962 View in CoL
24. Macrosetae SgeIV and StiIV are equal................................................. P. rogusus Denmark, 1966
- Macroseta SgeIV shorter than StiIV...................................................................... 25
25. Z4 equal to r3............................................................ P. coheni Swirski & Shechter, 1961 View in CoL
- Z4 longer than r3.................................................................................... 26
26. Tip of macrosetae blunt........................................... P. leopardisimilis Pramanik & Karmakar, 2016
- Tip of macrosetae knobbed............................................................................. 27
27. Tip of macrosetae on Leg IV with hyaline cap.............................................................. 28
- Tip of macrosetae on Leg IV without hyaline cap........................................................... 29
28. Macroseta SgeIV longer 15–17...................................... P. namkhanaensis Karmakar & Bhowmik, 2018
- Macroseta SgeIV shorter 8–10............................................ P. brevicrinis Swirski & Shechter, 1961 View in CoL
29. Macrosetae SgeIV and StIV are equal.............................................. P. indicus Bhattacharrya, 1968 View in CoL
- Macroseta SgeIV and StIV are unequal.................................................................... 30
30. Ventrianal shield pentagonal....................................................... P. punjabensis Gupta, 1977b View in CoL
- Ventrianal shield sole-shaped........................................................................... 31
31. Seta r3 longer than Z5................................... P. mizoramensis Gupta & Chatterjee, 2003 in Gupta, 2003
- Seta r3 shorter than Z5.............................................................. P. swirskii Gupta, 1980a View in CoL
Banks, N. (1909) New Canadian mites (Arachnoidea; Acarina). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 2, 133 - 143.
Chaudhri, W. M. (1973) Description of five new species of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga from Pakistan (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 5 (1), 79 - 86.
Denmark, H. A. (1966) Revision of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1904 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Department of Agriculture Bulletin, 6, 1 - 105.
Ehara, S. (1962) Notes on some predatory mites (Phytoseiidae and Stigmeidae). Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 6 (1), 53 - 60. https: // doi. org / 10.1303 / jjaez. 6.53
Ehara, S. & Bhandhufalck, A. (1977) Phytoseiid mites of Thailand (Acarina: Mesotigmata). Journal of the Faculty of Education, Tottori University, Natural Science, 27 (2), 43 - 82.
Evans, G. O. & Macfarlane, D. (1962) A new mites of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga (Acari: Mesostigmata). Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 13 (4), 587 - 588. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222936108651183
Gupta, S. K. (1969 b) Three new species of the genus Phytoseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from India. The Israel Journal of Agricultural Research, 19, 115 - 120.
Gupta, S. K. (1977 b) Some new and known species of Typhlodromus and Phytoseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from western and northern India. Indian Journal of Acarology, 1, 11 - 18.
Gupta, S. K. (1977 d) New species and records of Typhlodromus and Phytoseius from eastern India (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Indian Journal of Acarology, 2, 1 - 11.
Gupta, S. K. (1980 b) New species and records of Phytoseius mites (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from south India. Bulletin of the Zoological Survey of India, 3, 51 - 54.
Gupta, S. K. (1980 a) Three new Phytoseiidae (Acarina) from north-east India. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 115, 209 - 212.
Gupta, S. K. (1981 b) Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Jammu and Kashmir, India, with descriptions of five new species. Indian Journal of Acarology, 5, 37 - 49.
Gupta, S. K. (1986) Fauna of India (Acari: Mesostigmata) Family Phytoseiidae. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, 350 pp.
Gupta, S. K. (1992) Arachnida: plant mites (Acari). State Fauna. Series 3. Fauna of West Bengal. Vol. 3. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, pp. 61 - 211.
Gupta, S. K. (2003) A monograph on plant inhabiting predatory mites in India. Part II: Order: Mesostigmata. Memoirs of the Zoological Survey of India, 20, 1 - 185.
Karmakar, K. & Bhowmik, S. (2018) Description of eight new species and re-description of four species belonging to the family Phytoseiidae (Acai: Mesostigmata) from West Bengal, India. Zootaxa, 4422 (1), 41 - 77. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4422.1.3
Narayanan, E. S., Kaur, R. B. & Ghai, S. (1960) Importance of some taxonomic characters in the family Phytoseiidae Berl. 1916 (Predatory mites) with new records and descriptions of species. Proceedings of National Institution of Science, India, 26 B (6), 384 - 394.
Pramanik, S. & Karmakar, K. (2016) Description of six new species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Arunachal Pradesh, India. Persian Journal of Acarology, 5 (3), 161 - 187. https: // doi. org / 10.22073 / pja. v 5 i 3.19618
Rather, A. Q. (1985) On some Phytoseiid mites from India. Rivista di Parassitologia, 2 (46), 291 - 295.
Swirski, E. & Shechter, R. (1961) Some phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) of Hong-Kong, with a description of a new genus and seven new species. The Israel Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 97 - 117.
Wainstein, B. A. (1959) New subgenus and species of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1902 (Phytoseiidae: Parasitiformes). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 38, 1361 - 1365. [in Russian]
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
1 (by plazi, 2021-11-17 07:01:26)
2 (by tatiana, 2021-11-17 13:13:20)
3 (by tatiana, 2021-11-17 13:36:11)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-17 13:36:33)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-17 13:45:02)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-19 15:12:22)
7 (by plazi, 2023-11-08 06:11:55)