Pleurobranchus iouspi, Ev. Marcus, 1984
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7225407 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7B5BA125-7B59-027A-4E4F-78E9FD9A2B91 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Pleurobranchus iouspi |
status |
|
Pleurobranchus iouspi View in CoL and P. testudinarius are distinct species
Pleurobranchus iouspi View in CoL is currently considered a potential synonym of P. testudinarius ( Goodheart et al. 2015) View in CoL . The configuration of the penial flaps is similar in both P. testudinarius View in CoL and P. iouspi View in CoL , however, they are not identical. According to the original description and illustrations and the redescription in the present study of P. iouspi View in CoL and the specimen from Maranhão state (Ev. Marcus 1970), the genital aperture, including the penis, is surrounded by three distinct large penial flaps ( Figs. 12 View Fig A-C). In contrast, P. testudinarius View in CoL has several penial flaps laterally and ventrally to the penis in P. testudinarius View in CoL ( Martynov and Schrödl 2009: 60, fig. 5A; this study, P. testudinarius View in CoL from Bay of Naples, Italy [1]: MV F85659). Therefore, the penial flaps do not surround the penis in P. testudinarius View in CoL as is the case in P. iouspi View in CoL ( Figs. 12 View Fig A-B), which leads us to believe that the specimen from Maranhão state (Ev. Marcus 1970) actually corresponds to P. iouspi View in CoL .
Pleurobranchus iouspi Ev. Marcus, 1984 View in CoL was described based on a single specimen from the coast of São Paulo state, and only recorded as “ Oscanius View in CoL (?) testudinarius View in CoL ” based on specimen from Maranhão state. Recently collected specimens and the rediscovery of the slides of the holotype in the MZSP allowed us to re-describe this species. The distinguishing features mentioned in the original description, which allowed the determination of the specimens in this study are: the size of the tubercles on the mantle, genital apertures surrounded by three large flaps ( Figs. 12 View Fig A-C), deferent duct spiraling into the smooth muscular conical penis, the non-contractile penis ( Figs. 11 View Fig F-H; 12F), and the asymmetrical basal penial lobe ( Figs. 11G View Fig ; 12 View Fig B-C, E-F). Goodheart et al. (2015) analyzed only nuclear data (histone 3, H3) of specimens from Brazil and Mediterranean Sea and suggest that P. iouspi View in CoL and P. testudinarius View in CoL are possibly synonyms. We believe that it is better to keep P. testudinarius View in CoL and P. iouspi View in CoL as distinct due the fact that the nuclear data alone of few specimens is not a strong evidence of conspecificity because it is a conservative data, the fragment studied by Goodheart et al. (2015) is very short resulting in a limited data problem, and mostly due the diagnostic differences in the flaps on the gonopore. The detailed anatomical study provided in the present paper permit that future studies compare anatomically this description with material from Mediterranean Sea.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pleurobranchus iouspi
Grzelak, Katarzyna & Sørensen, Martin V. 2022 |
Pleurobranchus iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
P. iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
P. iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
P. iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
P. iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
Pleurobranchus iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
P. iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
P. iouspi
Ev. Marcus 1984 |
Oscanius
Gray 1847 |