Lamispina amoureuxi, Salazar-Vallejo, 2014

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2014, Revision of Pherusa Oken, 1807 (Polychaeta: Flabelligeridae), Zootaxa 3886 (1), pp. 1-61 : 41-42

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A4987D3-326E-FFB3-FF37-FD082D36F9B0

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Lamispina amoureuxi
status

sp. nov.

Lamispina amoureuxi View in CoL n. sp.

Figure 16 View FIGURE 16

Ilyphagus sp. Amoureux, 1982:191 (partim).

Type material. Northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Holotype (MNHN 1557) and paratype (MNHN 1558), off SW Ireland, RV Thalassa, Cruise 1973, Sta. 447 (47°47'03" N, 11°12'00" W à 48°47'04" N, 11°14'03" W), 1200–1520 m, mud, Oct. 1973 (paratype anterior fragment, without tunic, dissected for anterior end details; 6.5 mm long, 3 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 9 chaetigers; gonopodial lobes in chaetiger 5). GoogleMaps

Additional material. One specimen (MNHN 477), juvenile without tunic, RV Thalassa, Cruise 1973, Sta. 440 (48°41'04" N, 10°21'05" W), 860 m, mud, Oct. 1973 GoogleMaps . Three specimens (MNHN 477), an anterior and two medial fragments, damaged, RV Thalassa, Cruise 1973, Sta. 447 (47°47'03" N, 11°12'00" W à 48°47'04" N, 11°14'03" W), 1200–1520 m, mud, Oct. 1973 GoogleMaps .

Description. Holotype (MNHN 1557) includes an anterior and a posterior fragment, apparently fitting together. Body with parallel sides, truncated at both ends, body wall pinkish, sediment cover whitish ( Fig. 16A, B View FIGURE 16 ); 10+ 11 mm long, 3 mm wide, cephalic cage 3 mm long, 17+15 chaetigers. Tunic with large sediment particles, mainly foraminifera, completely covering body, with smaller tests laterally and ventrally. Papillae long, basally prismatic, darker, peduncle slightly capitate, arranged as two series per segment (one in first three chaetigers), placed along the same level as chaetal lobes, anterior series with 4–6 papillae, posterior series with 6–8 papillae; anterior series with less papillae in posterior segments. Segmentation indistinct due to foraminiferal cover.

Anterior end observed in paratype (Sta. 447). Cephalic hood short, margin smooth. Prostomium low; eyes not seen. Caruncle short, triangular. Palps thick, about 3 x as thick and darker than branchiae; palp lobes rounded, low. Lateral and dorsal lips reduced by compression; ventral lip not visible ( Fig. 16C View FIGURE 16 ).

Branchiae arranged in a continuous row with four filaments, and two lateral groups each with two filaments. Nephridial lobes short, digitate, at the inner base of the proximal group of branchiae.

Cephalic cage chaetae as long as body width; chaetigers 1–2 forming cephalic cage. Chaetae arranged in two short groups, with four chaetae per ramus.

Anterior dorsal margin of first chaetiger papillose, papillae long, cirriform. Chaetigers 1–3 progressively larger, provided with long papillae. Chaetal transition from cephalic cage chaetae to body chaetae abrupt; lamispines present from chaetiger 2. Gonopodial lobes on chaetiger 5, globose, tips greyish ( Fig. 16D View FIGURE 16 ).

Parapodia poorly developed, low transverse folds; more projected along first 5–6 chaetigers. Notopodia lateral, neuropodia ventrolateral. Notopodia with one long papilla, exposed over foraminiferal cover. Neuropodia projected lateral lobes with two long papillae, exposed above tunic.

Medial notochaetae multiarticulated capillaries, articles barely visible basally, few medial ones medium-sized, progressively longer distally ( Fig. 16E View FIGURE 16 ); 3–4 per bundle, about as long as 1/3–1/2 body width. Neurochaetae multiarticulated capillaries in chaetiger 1; lamispines present from chaetiger 2, arranged in transverse series, 5–6 lamispines throughout the body; tips incurved, without hood ( Fig. 16F View FIGURE 16 ).

Posterior end truncate; pygidium with anus dorsoterminal, papillose, without anal cirri ( Fig. 16G View FIGURE 16 ).

Etymology. This species is named after Louis Amoureux, who made many significant contributions to polychaete systematics and especially because he studied the materials collected during the R.V. Thalassa cruises, including these specimens. The epithet is a noun in the genitive case.

Remarks. Lamispina amoureuxi n. sp. and L. keeli n. sp. diverge from other species in the genus because their tunics have large sediment particles. They differ from each other in the relative extent of sediment particles on their bodies, and on the start and type of lamispines. In L. amoureuxi sediment particles surround the body, its lamispines start in chaetiger 2, and their tips are entire, without accessory tooth, whereas in L. keeli sediment particles are restricted to the dorsal surface, its lamispines start in chaetiger 3, and their tips are bidentate with a distinct, long accessory tooth.

Type locality. Off Brest , France, in muddy bottoms at 1200–1520 m depth .

Distribution. Northeastern Atlantic Ocean, in the area off Brest, France and Southern Ireland, in muddy or mixed bottoms, at 860–1520 m depth.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Terebellida

Family

Flabelligeridae

Genus

Lamispina

Loc

Lamispina amoureuxi

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2014
2014
Loc

Ilyphagus sp. Amoureux, 1982:191

Amoureux, L. 1982: 191
1982
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF