Lamispina falcata (Støp-Bowitz, 1948) Salazar-Vallejo, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10531726 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A4987D3-326A-FFB4-FF37-F9742FCAFC4F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lamispina falcata (Støp-Bowitz, 1948) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Lamispina falcata (Støp-Bowitz, 1948) View in CoL n. comb.
Figure 19 View FIGURE 19
Pherusa falcata Støp-Bowitz, 1948a:22–24 View in CoL , Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 .— Hartmann-Schröder, 1971:372, 1996:419.—Jirkov & Philippova, 2001:363, Figs 4–6 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 (repr. from original).
Type material. Northeastern Atlantic Ocean, Norway. Seven syntypes ( ZMUB 41784 ), Ideosen, Herdla, 11 Sep. 1924, Grieg, coll.
Description. Syntypes (ZMUB 41784) three anterior fragments (one without cephalic cage region), and four posterior fragments, tapered posteriorly, macerated ( Fig. 19A View FIGURE 19 ); largest syntype a mature female ( Fig. 19B, C View FIGURE 19 ). Body pale, almost without sediment cover, integument shiny; 4–6 mm long, 1.0– 1.3 mm wide, cephalic cage 2–3 mm long, 9–10 chaetigers. Tunic thin, free from sediment. Body papillae digitate, fine sediment particles adhering basally and medially, fusiform, arranged in 8–10 transverse alternating series per segment, most eroded over anterior dorsal surface; better preserved close to chaetal lobes, posteriorly or ventrally.
Anterior end not exposed; dissection avoided due to condition of specimens. Cephalic cage chaetae 2–3 x longer than body width. Chaetigers 1–2 forming cephalic cage, chaetigers 3–4 with notochaetae as long as following ones. Cephalic cage chaetae arranged in short series, chaetiger 1 with notochaetae dorsal, neurochaetae lateral, chaetiger 2 with chaetae lateral. Chaetigers 1 and 2 with about 10 noto- and 6 neurochaetae.
Anterior dorsal margin of first chaetiger papillated, some central papillae longer. Chaetigers 1–3 increasing in length posteriorly. Chaetal transition from cephalic cage to body chaetae abrupt; lamispines from chaetiger 4. Gonopodial lobes not seen.
Parapodia poorly developed; chaetae emerge from body wall ( Fig. 19D View FIGURE 19 ). Parapodia lateral; medial neuropodia ventrolateral. Notopodia 1–3 better developed, low rounded chaetal lobes, with longer papillae. Neuropodia low rounded lobes, with longer papillae. Noto- and neuropodia close to each other.
Notochaetae arranged in short transverse series (up to chaetiger 10); afterwards unknown; all multiarticulated capillaries, articles medium-sized basally, long medially and distally ( Fig. 19E View FIGURE 19 ), about 10 notochaetae per ramus, 1.3x longer than body width. Neurochaetae multiarticulated capillaries in chaetigers 1–3; lamispines from chaetiger 4, arranged in transverse series, 4–5 per bundle; tips with a blunt, round tooth ( Fig. 19F View FIGURE 19 ).
Posterior end unknown; largest syntype a mature female, developing oocytes about 50 µm in diameter ( Fig. 19B, C View FIGURE 19 ).
Remarks. Lamispina falcata (Støp-Bowitz, 1948) n. comb., L. milligani n. sp., and L. schmidtii (Annenkova- Chlopina, 1924) n. comb. resemble each other by having body papillae delicate, filiform, which are easily eroded and leave bare surfaces.
As stated above, L. milligani can be separated from the other species by its very short notochaetae, not longer, than body width. Then, L. falcata and L. schmidtii differ due to the number and size of notochaetae, type and number of lamispines, and number of transverse series of papillae per segment. In L. falcata there are 4–5 lamispines and their tips are entire, not hooded, and 8–10 transverse series of papillae per segment, whereas L. schmidtii has slightly more lamispines (5–7) with tips hooded, and fewer transverse series of papillae (5–6).
Regarding the type material, Støp-Bowitz (1948a:24) indicated: “La côte oust jusqu’a Stad (62° N): Au milieu du Karmøsound, devant Kopervik (104 m; 4 ex., 3 juillet 1908; “Michael Sars” st. 115; B. [l’un d’entre eux est le holotypus]). This means that he had regarded one out of the four specimens as the holotype but it was apparently not separated; what is being regarded as the type series differs, but chaetal features agree despite the differences in localities and number of specimens.
Distribution. Originally described from Southwestern Norway, it has been recorded in the North Sea (Skagerrak), and has been regarded as being present in the Arctic Ocean. Probably subtidal to deep water (100–180 m).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lamispina falcata (Støp-Bowitz, 1948)
Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2014 |
Pherusa falcata Støp-Bowitz, 1948a:22–24
Hartmann-Schroder, G. 1996: 419 |
Hartmann-Schroder, G. 1971: 372 |
Stop-Bowitz, C. 1948: 24 |