Pherusa affinis ( Leidy, 1855 )

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I., 2014, Revision of Pherusa Oken, 1807 (Polychaeta: Flabelligeridae), Zootaxa 3886 (1), pp. 1-61 : 13-15

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A4987D3-324A-FF94-FF37-FEE82F8DFCB7

treatment provided by

Felipe (2021-06-15 03:32:04, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-02 23:14:07)

scientific name

Pherusa affinis ( Leidy, 1855 )
status

 

Pherusa affinis ( Leidy, 1855) View in CoL

Figure 2 View FIGURE 2

Siphonostomum affine Leidy, 1855:148 View in CoL .

Trophonia affinis .— Verrill, 1873:507–508, Pl. 14, Fig. 75 (Reprinted 1874:311–312, Pl. 14, Fig. 75).

Pherusa affinis View in CoL .— Gosner, 1978:194, Fig. 53.— Appy et al., 1980:33, Fig. 60 (both informal n. comb.).

Neotype material. Northwestern Atlantic Ocean . Neotype ( USNM 8882 ) and 13 paratypes ( USNM 1251742 ), one complete, off Point Judith (41°21'39" N, 71°28'53" W), Rhode Island, USFC Fish Hawk , Sta. 784, 12 Aug. 1880, sand, gravel and shell fragments, 20 m (complete paratype 32 mm long, 2 mm wide, cephalic cage 4.5 mm long, 75 chaetigers; small anterior fragment with a spongy tunic covering the back of chaetigers 1–2) GoogleMaps .

Additional material. Northwestern Atlantic Ocean. One anterior fragment ( MCZ 55669), Wiscasset, Maine, 6 Jun. 1966, T. Creaser, coll. Five specimens, one complete ( USNM 8898 ), Buzzards Bay , Massachusetts, USFC Fish Hawk, Sta. 1221, 11– 16 m, 10 Aug. 1881. Eleven specimens, one complete ( USNM 9119 ), off Newport, Rhode Island , USFC Fish Hawk, Sta. 795, 35 m, 14 Aug. 1880 (19.5 mm long, 1.5 mm wide, cephalic cage 4 mm long, 57 chaetigers). Twenty-five specimens ( USNM 9429 ), USFC Fish Hawk, Sta. 772, off Beaver Tail Lighthouse, 15 m, 6 Aug. 1880 (anterior fragments, dried-out). One specimen ( USNM 23256 ), without posterior region, off Bridgeport, Connecticut, 7 Sep. 1889, M.H. Pettibone, id. Three specimens ( USNM 40214 ), chaetae broken, body papillae eroded, one complete, Clam Harbour, Nova Scotia, Canada, 27 Jun. 1958, J.C. Medcof, coll. (complete 75 mm long, 5 mm wide, cephalic cage 8.5 mm long, 79 chaetigers). Eight specimens ( USNM 57662 ), three complete, three anterior fragments, one medial and one posterior fragments, Cape Cod Bay , Massachusetts, Biotic Census Sta. 2224C, 18-20 m, 27 Mar. 1969, C.D. Long, id. (complete ones 83–108 mm long, 4.0– 8.5 mm wide, cephalic cage 15.0– 15.5 mm long, 77–89 chaetigers). One anterior fragment ( USNM 1260293 ), Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, 1963, M. Cerame-Vivas, coll .

Description. Neotype (USNM 8882), complete, body cylindrical, tapered, posterior region swollen, blunt; 44 mm long, 3 mm wide, cephalic cage 6 mm long, 80 chaetigers. Papillae with fine sediment particles, a few capitate, most rounded, digitate, lobate ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ), some depressed ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ), arranged transversally to body axis, especially on anterior chaetigers: most papillae small, abundant, giving the surface a velvety appearance, larger dorsally. Larger digitate papillae along chaetal lobes and over the anterior dorsal margin of chaetigers 1–5, making a single, transverse series.

Cephalic hood short, margin smooth. Prostomium low cone; four dark brown eyes, anterior ones larger, posterior ones smaller. Caruncle short. Palps large, longer than branchiae; palp keels rounded. Lateral lips narrow, well developed ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); ventral lip reduced; dorsal lip rounded.

Branchiae cirriform, thick, four arranged in a row, barely separated dorsally; two of them (third ones counting from top) displaced slightly inner to the others. Palps longer than branchiae; all branchiae of the same length and width.

Cephalic cage chaetae about as long as 1/5 body length, over 2.5x longer than body width. Chaetigers 1–3 forming cephalic cage. Chaetae arranged as short series, dorsolateral in chaetiger 1, lateral in chaetigers 2–3. Chaetiger 1 with 7–8 chaetae per ramus, chaetiger 2 with 6–7, and chaetiger 3 with 5–6 chaetae per ramus.

Anterior dorsal margin of first chaetiger papillated, papillae digitate. Chaetigers 1–3 (sometimes up to chaetiger 5) with longer digitate papillae on anterior segment margins and chaetal lobes, arranged in 1–2 transverse series on the latter. Chaetigers 1–3 increasing in size posteriorly. Chaetal transition from cephalic cage to body chaetae abrupt; anchylosed, falcate blunt neurohooks start in chaetiger 5. Gonopodial lobes present in chaetigers 5–6 (– 7 in largest anterior fragment, USNM 8898), transverse short slits, close to neuropodia, visible after brushing off papillae, reduced to flat lenticular areas, becoming long behind neurochaetal lobes after body contraction.

Parapodia poorly developed, reduced low chaetal lobes; chaetae emerge from the body wall. Parapodia lateral; medial neuropodia ventrolateral. Notopodia with two series of long digitate papillae, prechaetal ones smaller, not continued towards the neuropodia. Neuropodia less developed with similar papillar arrangement to notopodia.

Medial notochaetae arranged in short oblique series; all notochaetae multiarticulated capillaries, articles short basally, becoming medium-sized medially and distally ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ), 8–10 (12 in largest specimen) per fascicle, as long as 1/3 body width. Neurochaetae multiarticulated capillaries in chaetigers 1–4; simple falcate neurohooks from chaetiger 5, superior one twice as large as others, arranged in transverse series, 3 in anterior chaetigers ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ), up to 4 in medial chaetigers, reduced to 3 in posterior chaetigers.

Posterior end slightly swollen, blunt; pygidium short, conical; anus dorsoterminal, without cirri.

Variation. Complete specimens were 19.5–108.0 mm long, 1.5–8.5 mm wide, cephalic cage 4.0– 15.5 mm long, 57–89 chaetigers. Three neurohooks per row in anterior chaetigers, four in medial ones; superior one largest, twice as large as the others (invariable). Five anterior chaetigers with long parapodial and middorsal papillae.

Remarks. Siphonostomum affine Leidy, 1855 was briefly described and although it is apparently well defined and understood being frequently recorded in some benthic ecology or regional studies (e.g., Gosner 1978:194, Appy et al., 1980:33, Steimle & Terranova 1991:10, Pollock 1998:181, Trott 2004:288), it must be defined by the proposal of a neotype and its redescription including illustrations to clarify the taxonomic status of the species ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.1–75.3.3). Joseph Leidy had a very productive life as a scientist, became president of the Academy of Natural Sciencies of Philadelphia ( Chapman 1891:348), and worked during 46 years in it ( Osborn 1913:342). His main legacy is in palaeontology and parasitic worms ( Walton 1927), the latter being part of the socalled Joseph Leidy Collection: parasitic organisms (Nemata, Nematomorpha), but his other specimens apparently were not deposited in the corresponding institution. Consequently, there is no type material available ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.4). The description of the neotype and its corresponding illustrations help discriminate the species from similar ones ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.5). The neotype was collected about 400 km away from the original type locality, but the regional oceanographic conditions are similar along this Northwestern Atlantic region, especially along the shore between type and neotype localities ( Townsend et al. 2006). Consequently, the neotype and other regional specimens are believed to be conspecific ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.6), and have been deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.7).

Pherusa affinis ( Leidy, 1855) groups with five other species due to their papillae being relatively clean with little or no sediment cover; however, P. affinis can be distinguished from the other species by having neurohooks from chaetiger 5.

Neotype locality. Off Point Judith (41°21'39" N, 71°28'53" W), Rhode Island, sand, gravel and shell fragments, 20 m depth. The original type locality was Beesley’s Point, New Jersey (39°16'36" N, 74°38'11" W), about 400 km along the Northeastern United States shore. GoogleMaps

Distribution. From the Bay of Fundy to Cape Hatteras, in intertidal and shallow water muddy bottoms, 11-35 m depth.

Appy, T. D., Linkletter, L. E. & Dadswell, M. J. (1980) Annelida: Polychaeta. In: A Guide to the Marine Flora and Fauna of the Bay of Fundy. Canada, Fisheries and Marine Service, Technical Report, 920, pp. i - vi + pp. 1 - 124.

Chapman, H. C. (1891) Memoir of Joseph Leidy, M. D., LL. D. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 43, 342 - 388. Available from: https: // archive. org / details / jstor- 4061730 (Accessed 1 Nov. 2014)

Gosner, K. L. (1978) Atlantic Seashore: A Field Guide to Sponges, Jellyfish, Sea Urchins, and More. Peterson Field Guides. Houghton Mifflin, New York, 241 pp.

ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature). (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4 th ed. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (The Natural History Museum), London, 306 pp (www. iczn. org / iczn / index. jsp). http: // dx. doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 50608

Leidy, J. (1855) Contributions toward a knowledge of the marine invertebrate fauna, of the coasts of Rhode Island and New Jersey. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 3, 135 - 158.

Osborn, H. F. (1913) Biographical memoir of Joseph Leidy 1823 - 1891. National Academy of Sciences, Biographical Memoirs, 7, 338 - 396. Available from: http: // www. nasonline. org / publications / biographical-memoirs / memoir-pdfs / leidy-joseph. pdf (Accessed 1 Nov. 2014)

Pollock, L. W. (1998) A Practical Guide to the Marine Animals of Northeastern North America. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, 371 pp.

Steimle, F. W. & Terranova, R. (1991) Trophodynamics of select demersal fishes in the New York Bight. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Memorandum NMFS-F / NEC- 84, 1 - 11.

Townsend, D. W., Thomas, A. C., Mayer, L. M., Thomas, M. A. & Quinlan, J. A. (2006) Oceanography of the Northwest Atlantic continental shelf (1, W); pp. 119 - 168 In Robinson, A. R. & Brink, K. H. (Eds.), The Sea: The Global Coastal Ocean: Interdisciplinary Regional Studies and Synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, volume 14.

Trott, T. J. (2004) Cobscook Bay inventory: A historical checklist of marine invertebrates spanning 162 years. Northeastern Naturalist, 11 (Special Issue 2), 201 - 324. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1656 / 1092 - 6194 (2004) 11 [261: cbiahc] 2.0. co; 2

Verrill, A. E. (1873) Report upon the invertebrate animals of Vineyard Sound and the adjacent waters, with an account of the physical characters of the region. Report of the United States Commissioner for Fisheries, Washington, 1871 - 1872, 295 - 778. [reprinted in 1874, different pagination, Government Printing Office, Washington, 478 pp]

Walton, A. C. (1927) A revision of the nematodes of the Leidy collections. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciencies of Philadelphia, 79, 49 - 163.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 2. Pherusa affinis (Leidy, 1855), paraneotypes (USNM 1251742). A. Anterior end, dorsal view. B. Same, ventral view. C. Non-type specimen (USNM 40214), anterior end, oblique dorsal view. D. Same, head, frontal view (branchiae and palps removed; BS: branchial scar, LL: lateral lip, PS: palp scar). E. Another paraneotype (USNM1251742), chaetiger 10, right notopodium (insets: basal and medial chaetal regions). F. Same, chaetiger 21, right neuropodium (insets: neurochaetal tips). Scale bars: A: 0.80 mm, B: 0.76 mm, C: 1.2 mm, D: 0.70 mm, E: 110 µm, F: 100 µm.

MCZ

Museum of Comparative Zoology

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Terebellida

Family

Flabelligeridae

Genus

Pherusa