Rhophitulus mimus, Ramos, Kelli S., 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3847.4.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FE94312C-CB7C-43E7-93AE-E5B67156F1C9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6135941 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A081E05-FF85-FFC8-49EA-FA25FC84FF22 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhophitulus mimus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhophitulus mimus View in CoL new species
( Figures 7–18 View FIGURES 7 – 12 View FIGURES 13 – 18 )
Diagnosis. Males of Rhophitulus xenopalpus n. sp. can be distinguished mainly by having: weakly inflated upper paraocular area, which is densely punctate and smooth between punctures; clypeus yellow only in central portion ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); legs with basitarsus yellow and subsequent tarsus light brown ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); mandibles and pronotal lobe yellowish brown. Females differ from those of other species of Rhophitulus by the following combination of features: pronotal lobe black ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); ventral margin of mid femur with acute expansion; clypeus entirely black, integument between punctures smooth and shiny ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); ventral portion of mesepisternum with strongly curved hairs apically; mandible brown; labral plate as wide as long, flat, with distal margin straight; marginal zone of metasomal terga weakly reticulate (reticulation more evident on T1); mesoscutum densely punctate (ca. 1 dp), slightly reticulate between punctures, and with short pilosity (0.3x as long as ocellar diameter) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ).
Comments. The male of Rhophitulus mimus n. sp. runs to R. steinbachi (Friese, 1916) in Schlindwein & Moure's (1999) key, due to: the upper paraocular area inflated, clypeus with yellow marks, labrum and supraclypeal area black, and labral plate subretangular. Rhophitulus steinbachi is known only from two males from Salta ( Argentina). Photographs of the lectotype of R. steinbachi were examined ( Figs. 40–42 View FIGURES 40 – 42 ). Rophitulus minus n. sp.
can be easily distinguished from R. steinbachi in having: less inflated head, upper paraocular area and vertex densely punctate (≤1.5 pd), clypeus partly yellow, basitarsus yellow and subsequent tarsal segment brown, pronotal lobe yellowish brown, and marginal zone of metasomal terga light brown.
Description. Holotype female. Approximate body length: 6.2 mm; maximum head width: 1.7 mm; maximum mesoscutum width: 1.4 mm; forewing length: 4.6 mm; maximum width of T2: 1.6 mm. Coloration. Integument mostly black. Basal portion of fore- and midtibia with small yellow spot; underside of antennal flagellum, tegula, pterostigma, tibial spurs, tarsus, and marginal zone of metasomal terga light brown ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ). Pubescence. Predominantly pale yellow, with light brown prepygidial and pygidial fimbria ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ). Labrum with coarse simple hairs; compound eyes glabrous; head with sparse and finely branched hairs, 0.7x as long as ocellar diameter on frons and gradually increasing in length towards clypeus ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); scape with erect pilosity; vertex with sparse and short hairs, their length about twice puncture diameter; ventral portion of gena with long hairs (> 2x as long as ocellar diameter). Pronotal collar, edge of pronotal lobe, dorsolateral portion of mesepisternum, and edge of mesoscutum with dense, short, plumose pubescence ( Figs. 8, 11 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); disc of mesoscutum and scutellum with dense, erect, short, branched hairs (0.3x as long as ocellar diameter) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); scutellum with two long hairs (one on each side), their length> 3x as long as ocellar diameter; metanotum with dense, long, plumose pilosity; metapostnotum and propodeum with sparse, thin, short hairs (length about twice the puncture diameter); lateral corners of propodeum with few long and plumose pilosity ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); lateral mesepisternum with short and thin pilosity intermixed with long and plumose hairs (2x as long as ocellar diameter); ventral portion of mesepisternum with strongly curved hairs apically; metepisternum with sparse and minute hairs; tibial scopae with long, simple, sparse hairs (those on the anterior surface 1.2x as long as the maximum width of tibia) ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); outer surface of hind basitarsus with short and finely branched hairs; inner surface of hind tibia and basitarsus with keirotrichia dense and short hairs. Disc of metasomal terga with tiny decumbent hairs (except for a few erect hairs on the lateral portion), its density and length increasing towards the apex of metasoma; premarginal line of T2–T4 with a loose fringe of finely branched hairs; marginal zone of metasomal terga and sterna glabrous; S1 with dense erect plumose hairs; S2–S4 with sparse erect plumose hairs; distal half of S5 with dense semidecumbent plumose pilosity. Integumental surface. Integument between punctures predominantly smooth and shiny ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ). Ventral portion of gena, mesoscutum, pronotum, mesepisternum, metepisternum, propodeum, outer surface of hind basitarsus, and metasomal sterna reticulate between punctures. Labral plate and facial fovea smooth; frons, upper paraocular area, and gena densely punctate (≤1 pd); lower portion of face with sparse and coarse punctures (>3 pd on clypeus) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ); vertex coarsely punctate (≤2 pd), space between punctures micropunctate; mesoscutum, scutellum, and mesepisternum densely punctate (≤1.5 pd) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); metanotum with contiguous punctures; metapostnotum slightly depressed with longitudinal striations ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); propodeum with dense and fine punctures (≤1 pd). Metasomal terga with dense and fine punctures (on T1 ≤1 pd), premarginal area smooth; marginal zone weakly reticulate; pygidial plate with transverse microsculpture. Structure (measurements in mm). Head 1.1x wider than long (1.7:1.5); labial palpi slender and subcylindrical ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); first labial palpus longer than 2–4 combined; labral plate as wide as long (0.25:0.25), distal margin straight; tentorial pit on epistomal suture below the intersection with outer subantennal suture; compound eyes 2.3x longer than wide (0.94:0.4), inner orbits subparallel (upper: 1.2; lower: 1.17); clypeus 2.1x wider than long (0.71:0.34); frontal line consisting of a well-marked sulcus, deeper at level of antennal sockets; upper paraocular area slightly inflated; facial fovea deep, 3x as longer than wide (0.27:0.09) ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); gena narrow in lateral view, 0.7x as wide as compound eyes. Forewing with two submarginal cells; first submarginal cell longer than the second; 1m-cu reaching the second submarginal cell on its anterior onethird; ventral margin of midfemur with acute expansion; midtibial spurs finely serrate, 0.8x as long as basitarsus (0.37:0.48); hind tibial spurs similar in length; tergal marginal zone weakly depressed in comparison to disc; lateral line evident only in T1; lateral fovea of T2 large and slightly depressed; pygidial plate V-shaped with slightly elevated longitudinal line.
Paratype male. Approximate body length: 5.3 mm; maximum head width: 1.5 mm; maximum mesoscutum width: 1.1 mm; forewing length: 3.8 mm; maximum width of T2: 1.2 mm. Identical to female, except for the following yellow areas: most of mandible, small spot on lower paraocular area, central portion of clypeus, anterior surface of foretibia, basal half of mid and hind tibia, basitibial plate, and basitarsus ( Figs. 9–10 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); pronotal lobe yellowish brown. Pilosity mostly white; head and lateral portion of mesepisternum densely pilose; scape with short and decumbent pubescence, long and erect hairs intermixed (as long as ocellar diameter); ventral portion of mesepisternum with straight hairs apically; face densely and coarsely punctate, punctures contiguous on clypeus; mesepisternum with coarse punctures. Structure (measurements in mm). Head 1.1x wider than long (1.48:1.31); labral plate 2x wider than long (0.28:0.14); compound eyes 1.8x longer than wide (0.88:0.48), inner orbits slightly convergent below (upper: 1.0; lower: 0.91); clypeus 1.4x wider than long (0.65:0.45); frontal line shallow; facial fovea small, 2.8x longer than wide (0.14:0.05); antennal flagellum longer than the maximum head width; midtibial spur 0.7x as long as basitarsus (0.27:0.40); hind tibial spurs similar in length; outer margin of hind tibia toothed; metasomal terga with postgradular area depressed in comparison to disc ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7 – 12 ); T1 with lateral line; lateral fovea of T2 slightly depressed; pygidial plate absent; distal margin of T7 straight; S6 with U-shaped emargination distally; apical lobes of S7 constricted basally, with few coarse hairs ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); base of genital capsule with small dorsal sclerite; gonocoxite with oblique lateral impression ( Figs 16–17 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); cuspis of volsella elongate ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); gonostylus densely pilose apically ( Figs 16–18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ).
Variation. Yellow marks on clypeus of males vary slightly in width.
Distribution. ARGENTINA: Salta. The species is distributed in dry areas above altitude of 3000 m in the Andean cordillera, Chacoan subregion of Neotropical region.
Type material. Holotype female ( AMNH), " Argentina, Salta:\ 18 km E Cachi, 3000m \ March 21, 1990 \ J. G. Rozen & A. Roig". Paratypes, Argentina, Salta: 1 female and 2 males ( AMNH) and 1 female and 2 males ( MZSP, one with terminalia dissected), same collection data as the holotype; 1 male ( AMNH) and 1 male ( MZSP), " Argentina, Salta: 18 km \ E Cachi March 21,1990\ Rozen & Roig\ near nest area".
Etymology. The specific epithet mimus derives from the Latin word meaning "imitator, actor", and refers to the overall similarity of this species with other Rhophitulus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |