Schoengastia scincicola Lawrence, 1949
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5493.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F877253-B72C-4401-9933-072A9C93B65B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13269181 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/797C3C79-FF88-FFD5-FF33-526AFB1BFB1B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Schoengastia scincicola Lawrence, 1949 |
status |
|
Schoengastia scincicola Lawrence, 1949 View in CoL
( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 )
Schoengastia scincicola Lawrence, 1949: 427 View in CoL , fig. 14; Wharton & Fuller 1952: 89; Vercammen-Grandjean 1958b: 659, pl. 9; Stekolnikov 2018: 88 View Cited Treatment .
Schoengastia (Schoengastia) scincicola View in CoL : Zumpt 1961: 159; Vercammen-Grandjean 1965b: 82.
Diagnosis. SIF = 7BS-N-3-3111.1000; fPp = b/N/NNN; AL> PL >> AM; fD = 2H-8-6-6-4+(4–6); DS = 30–32; V = 24–25; NDV = 55–56; scutum pentagonal, with greatly projected rounded posterior margin; sensillary bases anterior to level of PLs; Ip = 823–850. Standard measurements are given in Table 6 View TABLE 6 .
Redescription (holotype, 2 paratypes, and 1 non-type specimen). IDIOSOMA ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11A–F View FIGURE 11 ). Eyes 2 + 2, in ocular plate; 30–32 dorsal idiosomal setae, including one pair of humeral setae, moderately barbed, 8 setae in 1 st posthumeral row (C excluding humeral setae), by 6 setae in next two rows (D and E), four setae in 4 th row (F) plus 4–6 caudal setae; 4 sternal setae; 24–25 ventral setae; NDV = 55–56.
GNATHOSOMA ( Fig. 11G–I View FIGURE 11 ). Cheliceral blade with tricuspid cap and row of 5–6 dorsal teeth; cheliceral base with sparse puncta; gnathobase with sparse puncta, transverse cuticular striations and one pair of branched gnathocoxal (tritorostral) setae; galeal (deutorostral) seta nude; palpal claw with three prongs; seta on palpal femur with one branch (visible only in one specimen); setae on palpal genu and tibia nude; palpal tarsus with 7 branched setae, subterminala (ζ) and tarsala (ω).
SCUTUM ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11C View FIGURE 11 ). Pentagonal, moderately covered with small puncta, anterior scutal margin slightly concave, lateral margins almost straight, posterior margin greatly projected, rounded; AM posterior to level of ALs; sensillary (trichobothrial) bases anterior to level of PLs (PSB – P-PL = 2–6), with curved anterior ridges; AM uniform with dorsal idiosomal setae, ALs and PLs covered with long thin barbs; AL> PL >> AM; sensilla (trichobothria) globose, covered with setules.
LEGS ( Fig. 11J–L View FIGURE 11 ). All 7-segmented, with 1 pair of claws and claw-like empodium. Leg I: coxa with 1 branched seta (1B); trochanter 1B; basifemur 1B; telofemur 5B; genu 4B, 3 genualae (σ), microgenuala (κ); tibia 8B, 2 tibialae (φ), microtibiala (κ); tarsus 21B, tarsala (ω), microtarsala (ε) distal to tarsala, subterminala (ζ), parasubterminala (z), pretarsala (ζ). Leg II: coxa 1B; trochanter 1B; basifemur 2B; telofemur 4B; genu 3B, genuala (σ); tibia 6B, 2 tibialae (φ); tarsus 16B, tarsala (ω), microtarsala (ε) behind tarsala, pretarsala (ζ). Leg III: coxa 1B; trochanter 1B; basifemur 2B; telofemur 3B; genu 3B, genuala (σ); tibia 6B, tibiala (φ); tarsus 14B, mastitarsala.
Distribution and hosts. This species was described from Vumba and Chishawasha, Southern Rhodesia (currently Zimbabwe), ex Trachylepis varia (Peters) (syn. Mabuya varia ) ( Squamata: Scincidae ). Here I report it from South Africa (Drakensberg Mts, Champagne Castle, KwaZulu-Natal Prov.) and ex Pseudocordylus subviridis (Smith) ( Squamata: Cordylidae ) for the first time.
Material examined. Holotype, larva NM 4870, Vumba, S. Rhodesia, ex M. varia , February 1948, collector unknown ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 16 View FIGURE 16 ). One paratype, larva NM 4870/2, same data ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 17 View FIGURE 17 ). One paratype, larva deposited in NHM (1957-8-12 -35), same data ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 18 View FIGURE 18 ). One larva NM 4870/3, Champagne Castle , Hostel , Natal (currently KwaZulu-Natal Prov.), ex P. subviridis , collector and date unknown ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 19).
Remarks. The specimen of S. scincicola NM 4870/3 from Champagne Castle ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 19) and the specimen of S. monticola NM 4827 from Vumba ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 22) have an inscription “ paratype ”, but their collection data do not coincide with the original description and the identification labels seem not original. Probably, these specimens were re-identified and renumbered; therefore, I cannot regard them as true paratypes. I assume that the former initially belonged to the type series of S. monticola and the latter—to the type series of S. scincicola .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Schoengastia scincicola Lawrence, 1949
Stekolnikov, Alexandr A. 2024 |
Schoengastia (Schoengastia) scincicola
Vercammen-Grandjean, P. H. 1965: 82 |
Zumpt, F. 1961: 159 |
Schoengastia scincicola
Stekolnikov, A. A. 2018: 88 |
Vercammen-Grandjean, P. H. 1958: 659 |
Wharton, G. W. & Fuller, H. S. 1952: 89 |
Lawrence, R. F. 1949: 427 |