Discorhabdella hispida, Ise & Vacelet & Izumi & Woo & Tan, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1076.37278 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D361D247-440F-4846-8AFB-7D3EE2CFD1EC |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/025E3E24-8A78-4AD1-9BD6-44FD92B55A35 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:025E3E24-8A78-4AD1-9BD6-44FD92B55A35 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Discorhabdella hispida |
status |
sp. nov. |
Discorhabdella hispida View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 2A-C View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4
Material examined.
Holotype. NSMT-Po-2489. Off Misaki , eastern part of Sagami Bay (Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ), Japan (35°7.484'N, 139°33.212'E to 35°7.504'N, 139°33.625'E), 223- 113 m depth, dredge, 13 January 2012. GoogleMaps
Description of holotype.
External morphology. Thinly encrusting, surface hispid due to protruding choanosomal large subtylostyles. Color greenish ochre in life, grayish white in ethanol. Size, 22 × 17 mm, about 0.3 mm thick (Fig. 2A-C View Figure 2 ). Oscules not observed in the living specimen; probably contracted in preserved state. Ostia observed only in preserved specimen, rounded, evenly distributed, 150-300 µm in diameter.
Skeleton. Hymedesmioid skeleton made by large choanosomal subtylostyles making the sponge surface hispid and by perpendicular acanthostyles with their bases attached on substrate. Ectosomal subtylostyles arranged perpendicular to surface with tips outward. Anchorate unguiferous isochelae and sigmoid microscleres roughly dispersed throughout the sponge.
Spicules. Choanosomal subtylotyles (Fig. 3A, B View Figure 3 ), long slightly curved near the base, maximum diameter at the base gradually tapering to sharp point (Fig. 3A View Figure 3 ). Base smooth and slightly lumpy (Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ). Size, 814-1500 µm in length, 42.0-56.5 (50.3) µm in shaft width, 52.4-70.8 (61.7) µm in base width.
Ectosomal subtylostyles (Fig. 3C-F View Figure 3 ), fusiform, smooth and straight; with smooth and slightly swollen base (Fig. 3D View Figure 3 ). Maximum diameter at middle region, then gradually tapering to a sharp point (Fig. 3E View Figure 3 ). Microspined sparsely around the shaft and densely around the tip (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ). Size, 292.2-392.5 (335.4) µm in length, 13.4-16.7 (15.2) µm in shaft width, 10.7-14.0 (12.9) in tyle width.
Acanthostyles (Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ), club-shaped head with conical spines having blunt ends. Shaft straight, fusiform, and densely covered with prominent spines with tips sharply pointed, devoid of spines on the last 10-20 µm towards extremity. Terminal holes or orifices of spines especially around head could be detected. Size, 84.0-127.5 (103.6) µm in length, 41.1-57.7 (48.0) µm in head width including spines, 26.3-42.4 (31.1) µm in head width without spines, 24-35.9 (27.8) µm in width of shaft including spine, 16.2-27.5 (21.3) µm in width of shaft without spine.
Anchorate unguiferous isochelae (Fig. 4B, C View Figure 4 ), strongly curved C-shaped shaft with lateral expansion that forming a pair of fimbriae along its entire length. Both extremities bearing 3-7 short and unequal shaped alae. The alae closest to the lateral fimbriae sometimes reduced or nearly absent, and connected to the fimbriae. Size, 27.3-38.0 (31.7) µm in length, 2.9-4.0 (3.5) µm in shaft width.
Sigmoid microscleres (Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ), strongly curved shaft and irregular in shape. Size, 20.7-31.2 (26.3) µm in length, 0.7-1.0 (0.8) µm in shaft width.
Distribution.
Known only from type locality, Misaki, eastern part of Sagami Bay, Japan.
Etymology.
Specific epithet refers to its hispid surface appearance.
Remarks.
The present species appears well characterized by its spicule complement, especially its microscleres. The isochelae have a unique shape, with a strongly curved shaft compared to all other species of Discorhabdella , which have a straight or feebly curved shaft. However, the isochelae of D. hispida sp. nov. are similar to the anchorate isochelae of Monanchora unguiculata (Dendy, 1922) (see also Lévi 1961, Vacelet et al. 1976). The presence of a sigmoid microsclere that is different from the true sigma, is also distinctive. Sigmas are present in four other Discorhabdella species: D. hindei ; D. littoralis ; D. ruetzleri and D. urizae ; however, in these species, there are several differences in the other spicule characters (see Table 1 View Table 1 ).
Discorhabdella hispida sp. nov. differs from D. hindei by having acanthostyle (length: 84.0-127.5 µm) instead of pseudoastrose acanthostyles (length: 43-57 µm) in D. hindei , a less tuberculated base of the choanosomal styles and a less developed tyle of the ectosomal subtylostyles. It differs from D. littoralis by larger choanosomal subtylostyles (814-ca 1500 µm vs 117-300 µm), by having acanthostyles instead of pseudoastrose acanthostyles, and a more tuberculated base of choanosomal subtylostyles. It differs from D. ruetzleri by larger choanosomal subtylostyles (814-1500 µm vs 470-810 µm), larger acanthostyles (84.0-127.5 µm vs 17-40 µm), larger isochelae (27.3-38.0 µm vs 20-25 µm), absence of spined microxea. It differs from D. urizae by larger choanosomal subtylostyles (814-1500 µm vs 220-750 µm in length), absence of spined microxeas and a less tuberculated base of the choanosomal styles. Acanthostyles that are more than 90 µm long have been observed only in D. tuberosocapitata and in D. misakiensis sp. nov. described in this study. But both species lack sigmoid microscleres and have choanosomal subtylostyles with a well-developed lumpy base. Tubercles around the base of choanosomal subtylostyles are not well developed in D. hispida sp. nov. and can be comparable with those recently found in D. pseudaster and D. ruetzleri . However, D. hispida sp. nov. totally lacks peculiar pseudoaster of D. pseudaster and also lacks spined microxea of D. ruetzleri .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |