Trematoppia cristipes BALOGH, 1964
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5731982 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6913365 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/784D87A5-370F-FFAB-E218-EBC9FB0AFD7D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trematoppia cristipes BALOGH, 1964 |
status |
|
Trematoppia cristipes BALOGH, 1964 View in CoL
( Figs 13–16 View Figs 13–16 )
The species (and a new genus) was described by BALOGH (1964), based on a single specimen (holotype) only, but it is absent from his collection. In the newly studied material I have also found one specimen, and although it is slightly damaged, it fits the description by J. BALOGH, therefore the identity is unambiguous.
Owing to the limited number of available specimens I give now only a short diagnosis, with some main characters:
Diagnosis: Prodorsum wide, rostrum round. Median costula absent; lateral costula, short transversal costula and one pair of longitudinal crests in interbothridial position present. Sensillus long slightly dilated, lanceolate. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present, setae la and lm present only as alveoli; other notogastral setae barbed. Anterior epimeres covered by two plates, not touching medially. All epimeral setae long, barbed. Genito-anal setal formula: 6–1–2–3, genital setae minute, all other ventral setae much longer, ciliate. All legs monodactylous, tibia of leg IV with ventral cusp, femur IV with wide, serrate ventral keel.
Type species: Trematoppia cristipes BALOGH, 1964 View in CoL
Remarks: The genus Trematoppia BALOGH, 1964 was classified by SUBÍAS (2010) into the oppioid subfamily Lanceoppiinae BALOGH, 1983 . In my opinion it is a misinterpretation, nearly all of the preceding features are different in the two taxa. Therefore, on this basis I relegate it to the family Teratoppiidae BALOGH, 1983 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Oribatida |
Family |
|
Genus |