Speoplanes biocovensis bosnicus Vrbica, Vesović, Rađa & Ćurčić, 2024

Vrbica, Maja, Vesović, Nikola, Rađa, Tonći & Ćurčić, Srećko, 2024, A new subspecies of the subterranean beetle Speoplanes biocovensis Müller, 1934 (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Leptodirini) from Bosnia and Herzegovina: the first occurrence of the genus outside Croatia, Zootaxa 5405 (3), pp. 422-432 : 425-430

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5405.3.5

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9DA83136-F19A-4A22-8320-EE3A09487013

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10603560

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/772187F5-FFE4-FF94-FF7D-FA93FC923724

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Speoplanes biocovensis bosnicus Vrbica, Vesović, Rađa & Ćurčić
status

subsp. nov.

Speoplanes biocovensis bosnicus Vrbica, Vesović, Rađa & Ćurčić , ssp. n.

( Figs. 3–6 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 )

Material examined. Holotype male labeled as follows: “ Golubinka na Bubalove Njive Pit , 43 ° 08’03.5’’ N, 17 ° 34’27.4’’ E, 66 m a.s.l., Bijača settlement, near the town of Ljubuški, southern Bosnia and Herzegovina, 20.IV.2019 (hand collection), leg. Tonći Rađa ” (white label, printed) GoogleMaps / Holotypus Speoplanes biocovensis bosnicus Vrbica, Vesović, Rađa & Ćurčić , ssp. n. Ćurčić det. 2023 (red label, printed) ( IZFB) ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3 ) . Paratypes: two males and seven females, same data as for holotype ( IZFB) ; one male and three females, same locality as for holotype, 12.V.2019 (pitfall trapping with rotten meat or cheese as bait), leg. Tonći Rađa ( IZFB) ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 ). All paratypes are labeled with white, printed locality labels and with red printed labels “Paratypus Speoplanes biocovensis bosnicus Vrbica, Vesović, Rađa & Ćurčić , ssp. n. Ćurčić det. 2023” .

Description. Large-sized leptodirine. TL M 8.32 mm (8.39 mm in males, 8.29 mm in females), R 8.03–8.60 mm (8.21–8.60 mm in males, 8.03–8.60 mm in females) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).

Habitus. Body elongate, elliptical, reddish-brown in colour ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).

Integument. Dull, barely pubescent, smooth on elytra, punctate on head and pronotum, with well-defined microsculpture ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Sparsely distributed yellow erect pubescence of medium length on pronotum, elytra and part of head (frons, vertex and neck). Dense yellow recumbent pubescence only on rest of head (clypeus and genae).

Head. Longer than broad (HL/HW M 1.17, R 1.10–1.22), not narrowed at neck level, without occipital carina ( Figs. 4A and D View FIGURE 4 ). Labrum slightly emarginate, with several long setae. Penultimate maxillary palpomere widened apically. Ultimate maxillary palpomere short, thin, gradually narrowing apically. Vertex with an impression. Antennae inserted shortly behind middle of head, slender, narrow, longer than body in males and females (AL/TL M 1.08, R 1.03–1.16), longer in males than in females (AL/TL M 1.14, R 1.11–1.16 in males; M 1.05, R 1.03–1.09 in females), AL M 8.98 mm (9.54 mm in males, 8.71 mm in females), R 8.38–10.03 mm (9.20–10.03 mm in males, 8.38–9.38 mm in females) ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Antennomere I short, narrow proximately, widening towards apex. Antennomere II narrow, elongate, slightly widened distally, significantly longer than antennomere I (A1L/A2L M 0.62, R 0.54– 0.68). Antennomeres II, III, and VIII of similar shape and size, narrow, slightly widened distally. Antennomeres IX and X slightly dilated distally. Antennomere I shortest (M 0.44 mm, R 0.41–0.52 mm), while antennomere V (M 1.03 mm, R 0.93–1.15 mm) longest in both sexes. Antennomere VIII relatively short and narrow, longer in males than in females (M 0.81 mm, R 0.76–0.88 mm in males; M 0.69 mm, R 0.65–0.75 mm in females), shorter and narrower than antennomeres VII and IX–XI. Ultimate antennomere slender, widening sub-distally, then narrowing apically, narrower than penultimate or as wide as it (A11W/A10W M 0.89, R 0.76–1.00). Other ratios of length of certain antennomeres: A3L/A2L M 1.04, R 0.97–1.11. A3L/A4L M 0.79, R 0.74–0.87. A6L/A3L M 1.23, R 1.15–1.30. A8L/A3L M 0.98, R 0.92–1.11. A11L/A8L M 1.13, R 0.99–1.22 ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ).

Prothorax. Pronotum sub-bell-shaped, about as long as broad, PL/PW M 0.99, R 0.95–1.03 (M 1.00, R 0.99– 1.02, in males; M 0.99, R 0.95–1.03 in females). PL/HL M 1.24, R 1.16–1.29. Lateral margins S-shaped. Widest at posterior angles in males and slightly anterior to middle in females, wider than head (HW/PW M 0.69, R 0.64–0.73) ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4B and E View FIGURE 4 ). Pronotal base almost straight. PB/AM M 1.45, R 1.34–1.51 (M 1.45, R 1.41–1.51 in males; M 1.44, R 1.34–1.51 in females) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ). Anterior margin barely convex medially. Anterior pronotal angles distinct, acute, pointed. Posterior pronotal angles slightly acute, almost right, not protruding posteriorly ( Figs. 4B and E View FIGURE 4 ). Pronotal disc moderately convex.

Mesothorax. Mesoventral carina high anteriorly, low posteriorly ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Anterior margin slightly concave, while posterior margin almost straight, with some setae. Tooth prominent, of variable shape (acute/right/obtuseangled), rounded. No mesoventral processus on mesoventrite ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Scutellum large, triangular ( Figs. 4B and E View FIGURE 4 ).

Metathorax. Metasternum without carina.

Elytra. Elongate, oval, broader in females than in males, EL/EW M 1.93, R 1.78–2.09 (M 2.04, R 2.00– 2.09 in males; M 1.88, R 1.78–2.01 in females), distinctly wider than pronotum, especially in females, EW/PW M 1.66, R 1.54–1.76 (M 1.57, R 1.54–1.59 in males; M 1.71, R 1.64–1.76 in females) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ) ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4C and F View FIGURE 4 ). Maximum width of elytra slightly in front of middle. Lateral margins arcuate. Shoulders weakly pronounced, obtuse, covered by posterior pronotal angles. Marginal furrows not visible from above. Elytral disc distinctly convex, in lateral view steeply sloping both basally and apically. Parasutural stria absent. Elytral apex slightly scaphoid. Pygidium covered by elytra.

Legs. Elongate and slender ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Femora widened basally, narrowed in distal half. Tibiae thin, slightly curved, gradually widening distally. Each anterior tibia has a reduced distal brush-like structure. Female protarsi four-segmented. Male protarsi five-segmented, with first three segments clearly widened and flattened. Tarsal claws elongate, narrow, curved, apically pointed.

Male genitalia. Aedeagus large, elongate, straight, sclerotized ( Figs. 6A and B View FIGURE 6 ). Basal bulb small and rounded in dorsal view ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ), while moderately large in lateral view ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ). Median lobe in dorsal view straight, subparallel, slightly tapering from middle to apex, rounded anteriorly, slightly bilobed at apex, slightly shorter than parameres ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Median lobe curved in lateral view, concave dorsally around middle, with pointed apex, bent downwards sub-apically, slightly bent upwards apically ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ). Parameres slender, narrow, arcuate, each with moderately widened rounded apex in dorsal view ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ), while in lateral view they slightly narrow distally ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ). Each paramere with three setae: one short apical, one short sub-apical and one longer sub-apical. Distance between apical seta and longer sub-apical seta greater than that between apical seta and shorter sub-apical seta. Longer sub-apical seta lies slightly below shorter sub-apical seta. Sclerites of inner sac thin and straight in both lateral and dorsal view ( Figs. 6A and B View FIGURE 6 ).

Female genitalia. Gonostyli slender, thin, gradually narrowing distally, straight, apically pointed ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Each gonostylus with one apical seta, three inner setae and one outer seta. Outer seta located at level between two inner setae. Spermatheca short, chitinized, basally slightly curved, almost straight and strongly constricted in middle, where somewhat less sclerotized, apically spherical ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ).

Female abdominal sternite VIII. Large, transverse, hairy, with short and thin anterior process ( Fig. 6E View FIGURE 6 ).

Diagnosis. The new subspecies is closely related to two other congeners, of which it is morphologically more similar to S. biocovensis biocovensis due to the shape of the sclerites of the inner sac (thin and straight) and the apex of the median lobe (flattened), as well as shorter legs and antennae and smaller AL/TL ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 ) ( Müller 1911, 1934; Jeannel 1924; Mizerakis et al. 2022).

Specimens of S. biocovensis bosnicus ssp. n. differ from S. biocovensis biocovensis in the size of the pro- and metatibiae in females (protibiae shorter than head and pronotum together, metatibiae shorter than elytra vs. protibiae as long as head and pronotum together, metatibiae as long as elytra), PL/PW (pronotum on average as long as wide vs. pronotum on average slightly longer than wide), position of maximum width of pronotum in females (slightly anterior to the middle vs. at the posterior angles), shape of mesoventral carina (less pronounced, with a more prominent tooth vs. more pronounced, with a less prominent tooth), and EL/EW in males (elytra less elongate vs. elytra more elongate). We also found that antennae in S. biocovensis bosnicus ssp. n. are on average shorter than in the nominotypic subspecies, and that antennomere VIII in the new subspecies is on average slightly shorter than antennomere III (antennomere VIII is on average slightly longer than antennomere III in S. biocovensis biocovensis ), antennomere XI in the new subspecies is on average longer than antennomere VIII (antennomeres XI and VIII are of similar length in S. biocovensis biocovensis ) and the pronotum in the new subspecies is on average about a quarter longer than the head (the pronotum in S. biocovensis biocovensis is on average about a third longer than the head) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 and Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ) ( Müller 1911, 1934; Mizerakis et al. 2022).

Specimens of S. biocovensis bosnicus ssp. n. differ from S. giganteus by the larger size (TL R 8.03–8.60 mm vs. 7.47–8.03 mm), HL/HW (1.10–1.22 vs. cca. 1.50), shorter antennae (AL R 8.38–10.03 mm vs. 10.42–11.15 mm), smaller AL/TL (R 1.03–1.16 vs. 1.30–1.32), A3L/A2L (0.97–1.11 vs. 1.14–1.20), A11L/A8L (0.99–1.22 vs. 0.87–0.96), size of pro- and metatibiae in females (protibiae shorter than head and pronotum together, metatibiae shorter than elytra vs. protibiae longer than head and pronotum together, metatibiae longer than elytra), PL/PW (pronotum as long as wide vs. pronotum significantly longer than wide), and the shape of the sclerites of the inner sac (thin and straight vs. compact and curved) ( Table 1 View TABLE 1 and Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ) ( Müller 1911; Jeannel 1924; Pretner 1973; Mizerakis et al. 2022).

Etymology. After Bosnia and Herzegovina, a country where the type locality of the new subspecies is situated.

Geographic distribution. This subspecies inhabits a pit near the town of Ljubuški in southern Bosnia and Herzegovina —the Golubinka na Bubalove Njive Pit. This is the first discovery of the genus Speoplanes in this country. Previously, this genus was only known from caves and pits in several mountains in southern Croatia (Dalmatia) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) ( Mizerakis et al. 2022; Čeplík 2023).

TABLE 1. Linear measurements and morphometric ratios of Speoplanes biocovensis bosnicus ssp. n., S. biocovensis biocovensis and S. giganteus. The values outside the parentheses are mean values, while the values inside the parentheses are ranges.

Species/subspecies Character TL* HL/HW HW/PW AL* AL/TL A1L/A2L A3L/A2L A3L/A4L A6L/A3L A8L/A3L A11L/A8L A11W/A10W PL/PW PL/HL PB/AM EW/PW EL/EW in males 8.32 (8.03–8.60) 1.17 (1.10–1.22) 0.69 (0.64–0.73) 8.98 (8.38–10.03) 1.08 (1.03–1.16) 0.62 (0.54–0.68) 1.04 (0.97–1.11) 0.79 (0.74–0.87) 1.23 (1.15–1.30) 0.98 (0.92–1.11) 1.13 (0.99–1.22) 0.89 (0.76–1.00) 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 1.24 (1.16–1.29) 1.45 (1.34–1.51) 1.66 (1.54–1.76) 2.04 (2.00–2.09) 8.25 (7.22–8.71) 1.08 (0.99–1.17) 0.72 (0.70–0.77) 9.50 (8.66–10.19) 1.13 (1.00–1.20) 0.63 (0.60–0.69) 1.09 (1.00–1.20) 0.78 (0.69–0.81) 1.27 (1.23–1.29) 1.03 (0.99–1.05) 1.02 (0.93–1.19) 0.98 (0.93–1.00) 1.07 (1.01–1.17) 1.35 (1.26–1.41) 1.40 (1.31–1.47) 1.66 (1.58–1.72) 2.16 (2.11–2.20) 7.84 (7.47–8.03) 1.18 (1.09–1.24) 0.74 (0.72–0.75) 10.79 (10.42–11.15) 1.31 (1.30–1.32) 0.61 (0.53–0.67) 1.17 (1.14–1.20) 0.82 (0.81–0.83) 1.24 (1.22–1.27) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 0.91 (0.87–0.96) 1.05 (0.80–1.30) 1.03 (1.00–1.05) 1.20 (1.09–1.27) 1.38 (1.35–1.45) 1.69 (1.61–1.73) 1.97 (1.86–2.13)
TL* 8.32 (8.03–8.60) 8.25 (7.22–8.71) 7.84 (7.47–8.03)
HL/HW 1.17 (1.10–1.22) 1.08 (0.99–1.17) 1.18 (1.09–1.24)
HW/PW 0.69 (0.64–0.73) 0.72 (0.70–0.77) 0.74 (0.72–0.75)
AL* 8.98 (8.38–10.03) 9.50 (8.66–10.19) 10.79 (10.42–11.15)
AL/TL 1.08 (1.03–1.16) 1.13 (1.00–1.20) 1.31 (1.30–1.32)
A1L/A2L 0.62 (0.54–0.68) 0.63 (0.60–0.69) 0.61 (0.53–0.67)
A3L/A2L 1.04 (0.97–1.11) 1.09 (1.00–1.20) 1.17 (1.14–1.20)
A3L/A4L 0.79 (0.74–0.87) 0.78 (0.69–0.81) 0.82 (0.81–0.83)
A6L/A3L 1.23 (1.15–1.30) 1.27 (1.23–1.29) 1.24 (1.22–1.27)
A8L/A3L 0.98 (0.92–1.11) 1.03 (0.99–1.05) 1.04 (1.01–1.07)
A11L/A8L 1.13 (0.99–1.22) 1.02 (0.93–1.19) 0.91 (0.87–0.96)
A11W/A10W 0.89 (0.76–1.00) 0.98 (0.93–1.00) 1.05 (0.80–1.30)
PL/PW 0.99 (0.95–1.03) 1.07 (1.01–1.17) 1.03 (1.00–1.05)
PL/HL 1.24 (1.16–1.29) 1.35 (1.26–1.41) 1.20 (1.09–1.27)
PB/AM 1.45 (1.34–1.51) 1.40 (1.31–1.47) 1.38 (1.35–1.45)
EW/PW 1.66 (1.54–1.76) 1.66 (1.58–1.72) 1.69 (1.61–1.73)
EL/EW in males 2.04 (2.00–2.09) 2.16 (2.11–2.20) 1.97 (1.86–2.13)

*—values in mm.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Leiodidae

Genus

Speoplanes

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF