Missulena davidi, Greenberg & Huey & Framenau & Harms, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.79.e62332 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:951E28C6-EAC0-494E-BC25-5DEF1991583B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8B7D21DD-872B-4C09-8776-7B7FAD1CBE57 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:8B7D21DD-872B-4C09-8776-7B7FAD1CBE57 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Missulena davidi |
status |
sp. nov. |
3.1. Missulena davidi sp. nov.
Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 , 7 View Figure 7
Type material.
Holotype: AUSTRALIA - Western Australia • ♂; Juna Downs Station, 113 km NW of Newman; 22°41.23′S 118°53.55′E; 10 May 2011; C. Cole and P. Runham leg.; pit trap; WAM T119725 • Allotype: AUSTRALIA - Western Australia • ♀; Hope Downs, 73.7 km NW of Newman; 20°59.42′S 119°7.3′E; 27 June 2010; G. Humphreys and P. Runham leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T107393 • Paratypes: AUSTRALIA - Western Australia • 1♀; same data as holotype; 22°41.18′S 118°53.58′E; dug from burrow; WAM T119711 • 1♀; Juna Downs Station, 114 km NW of Newman; 22°43.55′S 118°50.98′E; 12 May 2011; P. Runham leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T119718 • 1♂; Juna Downs Station, 116 km NW of Newman; 22°38.73′S 118°54.17′E; 11 May 2011; C. Cole and P. Runham leg.; pit trap; WAM T119726 • 1♂; same data as for preceding; WAM T119727 • 1♂; same data as for preceding; 10 May 2011; WAM T119728 • 1♂; same data as for preceding; WAM T119729 • 1♂; same data as for preceding; 117 km NW of Newman; 22°37.73′S 118°54.1′E; WAM T119731 • 1♂; same data as for preceding; 22°36.63′S 118°56.38′E; G. Humphreys and J. Tatler leg.; WAM T119733.
Other material examined.
AUSTRALIA - Western Australia • 1♀; Carnarvon, 99 Gascoyne Road ; 24°53′S 113°39′E; 23 July 2002; residents leg.; by hand; WAM T46798 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1♂; Cloudbreak Mining Lease, Fortescue Metals Group (site 25); 22°20.1′S 119°24.23′E; 6 Sept. 2006; S. Thompson leg.; WAM T84005 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1♀; Jimblebar minesite, 35 km E of Newman; 23°22.5′S 120°12.58′E; 6 Feb. 2009; P. Bolton and C. Weston leg.; active search; WAM T95397 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1♀; Murray Hills, Mulga Downs Station, Ecologia project 1142; 22°07.67′S 118°30.92′E; 19 Apr. 2009; N. Dight and L. Quinn leg.; dry pitfall trap; WAM T97637 View Materials GoogleMaps • 1♀; Davidson Creek , ca. 75 km E of Newman, vert site 6; 23°25.73′S 120°26.8′E; 9 Apr. 2010; J. Clark leg.; dry pitfall; WAM T102165 GoogleMaps • 1♀; South Parmelia , 52 km NW of Newman; 23°5.13′S 119°19.08′E; 16 Apr. 2011; R. Teale and M. Greenham leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T113591 GoogleMaps • 1♂; Southern Flank , 72 km NW of Newman; 23°0.17′S 119°8.37′E; 14 Apr. 2011; R. Teale and M. Greenham leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T113596 GoogleMaps • 1♂; same locality; 23°0.18′S 119°8.35′E, 14 Apr. 2011; R. Teale and M. Greenham leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T113598 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 113.8 km NW of Newman ; 22°39.39′S 118°55.09′E; 26 May 2011; M. Greenham and R. Teale leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T113626 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 119.1 km NW of Newman ; 22°38.02′S 118°52.19′E; 30 May 2011; M. Greenham and R. Teale leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T113660 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 117.6 km NW of Newman ; 22°37.66′S 118°53.76′E; 31 May 2011; M. Greenham and R. Teale leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T113665 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Mudlark , 107 km W of Newman; 23°5.63′S 118°43.17′E; 30 June 2011; C. Cole and N. Watson leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T116746 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Mudlark , 111 km WNW of Newman; 23°5.2′S 118°41.18′E; 30 June 2011; M. Greenham and J. Cairnes leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T116751 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 23°5.22′S 118°41.17′E; WAM T116755 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Mudlark , 113 km W of Newman; 23°2.28′S 118°40.97′E; 1 July 2011; M. Greenham and J. Cairnes leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T116776 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Mudlark , 102 km W of Newman; 23°5.4′S 118°48.67′E; 3 July 2011; C. Cole and N. Watson leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T116839 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Mudlark, 94 km W. of Newman ; 23°4.78′S 118°51.48′E; 6 July 2011; M. Greenham and J. Cairnes leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T116866 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same locality; 23°4.77′S 118°51.47′E; 26 July 2011; C. Cole and N. Watson leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T116868 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 84.2 km NW of Newman ; 22°40.5′S 119°20.95′E; 26 July 2011; D. Kamien, M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T116873 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 22°40.48′S 119°20.9′E; WAM T116874 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 89.3 km NW of Newman ; 22°38.45′S 119°19.23′E; WAM T116875 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 89.3 km NW. of Newman ; 22°38.45′S 119°19.22′E; WAM T116881 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Mulga Downs Station, Cowra , site 994-13; 22°13.63′S 119°0.82′E; 16 Apr. 2012; WAM T118328 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 84.8 km NW of Newman ; 22°40.1′S 119°22.48′E; 27 July 2011; D. Kamien, M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T119975 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 99.1 km NW of Newman ; 22°34.3′S 119°17.15′E; WAM T119979 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 22°34.3′S 119°17.17′E; WAM T119980 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 105.3 km NW of Newman ; 22°30.72′S 119°15.55′E; 28 July 2011; D. Kamien, M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T119984 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 22°30.72′S 119°15.53′E; WAM T119993 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 81.2 km NW of Newman ; 22°42.02′S 119°22.68′E; 29 July 2011; D. Kamien, M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T119995 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 85.2 km NW. of Newman ; 22°39.2′S 119°24.82′E; 31 July 2011; D. Kamien, M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T120018 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 22°39.2′S 119°24.83′E; WAM T120019 GoogleMaps • 1♂; same data as for preceding; 18.9 km NE of Tom Price ; 22°39.2′S 119°24.82′E; WAM T120081 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Koodaideri Corridor West , 93.7 km NE of Tom Price; 22°19.7′S 118°36.61′E; 20 Feb. 2012; C. Cole leg.; burrow search; WAM T122209 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 89.4 km NE of Tom Price ; 22°15.92′S 118°31.3′E; WAM T122217 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 71.7 km NE of Tom Price ; 22°8.12′S 118°8.17′E; WAM T122224 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 70.1 km NE of Tom Price ; 22°9.31′S 118°8.07′E; WAM T122226 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 22°9.37′S 118°8.07′E; leaf litter rake; WAM T122235 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 82.1 km NE of Tom Price ; 22°13.95′S 118°24.88′E; burrow search; WAM T122252 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 77.3 km NE of Tom Price ; 22°1.68′S 118°0.22′E; WAM T122254 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 111.6 km NW of Newman ; 22°53.52′S 118°45.89′E; 29 Mar. 2012; C. Cole and N. Watson leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T122822 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 115.4 km NW of Newman ; 22°54.52′S 118°43.05′E; 31 Mar. 2012; C. Cole and N. Watson leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T122843 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 118.6 km NW of Newman ; 22°52.85′S 118°41.22′E; 1 Apr. 2012; N. Watson and P. Brooshooft leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T122865 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 124 km NW of Newman ; 22°51.93′S 118°38.47′E; 1 Apr. 2012; N. Watson leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T122872 GoogleMaps • 1♂; 63.5 km ESE of Paraburdoo , site 1000-tur01; 23°17.31′S 118°17.1′E; 27 Apr. 2012; E.S. Volschenk leg.; wet pitfall; WAM T125176 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Koodaideri Western Corridor , 217.5 km NW of Newman; 22°7.71′S 118°5.57′E; 28 Mar. 2012; G. Humphreys and M. Greenham leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T125307 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 194.8 km NW of Newman ; 22°7.71′S 118°7.71′E; WAM T125308 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Koodaideri Western Corridor , 214 km NW of Newman; 22°8.14′S 118°6.46′E; 29 Mar. 2012; G. Humphreys and J. King leg.; dug from burrow; WAM T125316 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 118.2 km NW of Newman ; 22°36.32′S 118°55.15′E; 19 Nov. 2011; M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; WAM T126257 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 118.3 km NW of Newman ; 22°36.67′S 118°54.43′E; 18 Nov. 2011; M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; WAM T126260 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; WAM T126264 GoogleMaps • 1♀; 114 km NW of Newman ; 22°36′54″S 118°57′18″E; 21 Nov. 2011; M. Greenham and Z. Hamilton leg.; WAM T126272 GoogleMaps • 1♀; same data as for preceding; 22°36.87′S 118°57.3′E; WAM T126276 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Karijini National Park , ca. 20 km SW of Hancock Gorge; 22°29.03′S 118°8.85′E; 15 Mar. 2015; C. Stevenson, M.S. Harvey and M. Hillyer leg.; WAM T135548 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Karijini National Park, ca. 25 km SSW. of Dales Gorge ; 22°39.48′S 118°26.05′E; 17 Mar. 2015; M.S. Harvey et al. leg.; WAM T135563 GoogleMaps • 1♀; Karijini National Park , ca. 6 km NW of Mt Bruce; 22°34.12′S 118°5.98′E; 15 Mar. 2015; J. Huey et al. leg.; WAM T135591 GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.
Males of Missulena davidi sp. nov. share the red colouration of chelicerae and pars cephalica with M. langlandsi Harms and Harvey, 2013, M. occataria Walckenaer, 1805, M. insignis O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, M. iugum sp. nov. and M. manningensis sp. nov. that are morphologically most similar. They differ from M. langlandsi by having strong, conical spines of the rastellum (thin and not conical in the former) and a longer carapace (>3.00 mm; M. langlandsi up to 2.8 mm). They differ from M. occataria and M. insignis by having spines on patellae III and IV only and not on all four legs (on patellae I and II 1 spine, respectively). Missulena davidi sp. nov. males have more cuspules on maxillae and labium than those of M. manningensis sp. nov. ( M. manningensis sp. nov.: 5 at labium, 30 at maxillae; M. davidi sp. nov.: 15-10 at labium, 35-100 at maxillae). Missulena davidi sp. nov. males differ from M. iugum sp. nov. by the ridge present in the cheliceral groove. Females of Missulena davidi sp. nov. have uniformly red chelicerae that they share with M. insignis ; however, the fourth leg of M. davidi sp. nov. is the longest of all legs, whilst in M. insignis the longest leg is the first. Additionally, there are no cuspules recorded on the labium or the maxillae in M. insignis females.
Description.
MALE (based on holotype; WAM T119725). Total length 9.8. Colour: pars cephalica and chelicerae reddish-orange (Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ); a slim, black ring surrounding the PME (Fig. 4E View Figure 4 ); pars thoracica brown with a light, metallic blue sheen (Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ); abdomen greyish with a strong, metallic blue sheen on the dorsal side, ventrally more brownish with a faint hint of purple (Fig. 3D, E View Figure 3 ); sternum orange, slightly fading into olive with 8 sigilla in similar colour (Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ); labium and maxillae orange with a dark olive spot on the base of labium (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ); legs olive-yellowish fading into light brown ventrally, dorsally brown (Fig. 3A, B View Figure 3 ); spinnerets beige-coloured (Fig. 3E View Figure 3 ). Carapace: 3.86 long and 4.67 wide; clypeus 0.31; pars cephalica covers 2.45 of its length, is highly elevated and slightly granulated with very few setae (Fig. 3G View Figure 3 ); pars thoracica also granulated with bands of faint, radial fissures and with two notches close to the abdomen (Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ). Eyes: OQ 4 times wider than long; outer width of each eye pair AME 0.66, ALE 2.44, PME 1.48 and PLE 2.21; diameter of AME 0.19, ALE 0.22, PME 0.15, PLE 0.19; anterior eyes very slightly recurved; posterior eyes strongly recurved (Fig. 4E View Figure 4 ). Chelicerae: 2.04 long and 1.47 wide on the base; edges rounded and recurved with the widest point being 1.55 close to the chelicerae base (Fig. 3C View Figure 3 ); small, faint files along the outer margin of each chelicera; evenly spread setae along the inner margin and the anterior part of the chelicerae; rastellum present, slightly pronounced, consisting of a sclerotized process with 7 (left 8) strong, conical spines (Fig. 4F View Figure 4 ); over 25 setae cover the anterior base of fang of each chelicera; inner margin of cheliceral furrow with 2 rows of teeth and a general cheliceral teeth area in between those 2 clear rows (Fig. 4A, J View Figure 4 ); prolateral row with approx. 9 teeth; retrolateral row with 4 teeth; intermediate area with 10 small teeth. Maxillae: 2.08 long and 1.44 wide; at least 80-100 weakly developed cuspules along entire anterior margin (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ). Labium: 0.96 long and 0.86 wide on the base; conical; at least 40 weakly developed cuspules anteriorly (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ); labiosternal junction visible (Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ). Sternum: 2.6 long and 2.38 wide; ovoid (Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ); setae of various length somewhat densely but disordered along the margin and a smaller amount of setae spread unevenly over the sternum; 4 pairs of sigilla, anterior pair smallest and hardly visible, second pair also very small and circular, third pair significantly larger than second (roughly 5 times bigger) in the shape of an elongated oval, and posterior pair biggest (roughly 1.5 times the size of the third pair) in the shape of a drop, all sigilla slightly depressed. Abdomen: 3.88 long and 3.4 wide; shape of a rounded trapezoid (Fig. 3D View Figure 3 ); 4 spinnerets, PLS 1.12 long, 0.48 wide; PMS 0.43 long, 0.23 wide. Pedipalp: length of trochanter 1.49, femur 3.68, patella 1.68, tibia 4.01, tarsus 0.72; all segments with setae, tibia ventrally covered with comparably long setae (Fig. 4I View Figure 4 ); tibia rather thin and slightly recurved, 1.00 wide on the widest point from dorsal and prolateral view (Fig. 4G-I View Figure 4 ); bulb roughly pyriform (Fig. 4G-I View Figure 4 ), two strongly sclerotized sections connected by a velar median structure ( “haematodocha”); embolus short with an intumescence in proximal region; tip of embolus triangular with a small lamella and a tooth best visible from prolateral view (paratype, Fig. 3H, I View Figure 3 ). Legs: brown setae of various sizes on all sides of the legs and bent strongly towards the exterior with the exceptions of some long, dorsal setae on tibia I and IV; ventral preening comb on tarsi and metatarsi III and IV. Leg spination: leg I: tibia rv0, v5, pl0, d0; metatarsus rv3, v8, pl2, d0; tarsus rv3, v3, pl4, d0; leg II: tibia rv0, v8, pl0, d0; metatarsus rv0, v11, pl0, d0; tarsus rv3, v3, pl2, d0; leg III: tibia rv4, v8, pl0, d11; metatarsus rv4, v11, pl0, d11; tarsus rv5, v9, pl4, d5; leg IV: tibia rv0, v5, pl0, d0; metatarsus rv0, v16, pl0, d2; tarsus rv4, v10, pl3, d3; patella I with one spine prolateral close to the tibia and patella II with one spine ventrally also close to the tibia; patella III with ca. 23 spines prolateral to dorsal (Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ), 1 spine retrolateral; patella IV with one spine dorsal close to the tibia and approx. 12 small spines (Fig. 4C View Figure 4 ) and ca. 18 prolateral, also very small. Leg measurements: Leg I: femur 3.72, patella 1.29, tibia 2.72, metatarsus 2.37, tarsus 1.37, total 11.47. Leg II: femur 3.31, patella 1.36, tibia 2.43, metatarsus 2.26, tarsus 1.38, total 10.74. Leg III: femur 2.72, patella 1.26, tibia 1.93, metatarsus 1.92, tarsus 1.35, total 9.18. Leg IV: femur 3.45, patella 1.47, tibia 2.76, metatarsus 2.41, tarsus 1.51, total 11.6. Formula: 4>1>2>3.
FEMALE (based on allotype; WAM T107393). Total length 23.9. Colour: Carapace brown (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ); chelicerae reddish-orangish with a darker spot (dark reddish-brown) on each chelicerae base (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ); eye region light reddish colour similar to chelicerae (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ); abdomen greyish-brown with a faint, dorsal, metallic blue sheen (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ); sternum light brown fading into a reddish-brown towards labium (Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ), sigilla darker brown (Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ); labium und maxillae reddish-brown (Fig. 5E View Figure 5 ); legs brown (Fig. 5F, G View Figure 5 ); spinnerets lighter brown (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ). Carapace: 7.31 long and 9.88 wide; clypeus 0.74; pars cephalica covers 4.72 of its length, is highly elevated and smooth (Fig. 5D View Figure 5 ) with some setae going along the margin of the chelicerae as well as vertically in a line from the AME to fovea plus some random setae (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ); pars thoracica smooth surface with bands of faint, radial fissures (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ). Eyes: OQ 4.9 times wider than long; width of each eye pair AME 0.91, APE 6.01, PME 3.59 and PLE 5.54; diameter of AME 0.33, ALE 0.36, PME 0.25, PLE 0.3; anterior eyes in one straight line; posterior eyes clearly recurved (Fig. 5H View Figure 5 ). Chelicerae: 5.65 long and 4.15 wide on the base; edges rounded and recurved with the widest point being 4.73 close to the chelicerae base (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ); long setae along the inner margin increasing in amount towards rastellum; short and fewer setae along the outer margin and no setae in centre (Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ); rastellum present with 10-14 conical spines on each chelicera and long, densely disordered setae (Fig. 5I View Figure 5 ); approx. 25 setae cover anterior base of fang; inner margin of cheliceral furrow with two main rows of cheliceral teeth and a small cheliceral teeth area in between (Fig. 6F View Figure 6 ); prolateral row with 11 teeth, the first 3 teeth next to the fang’s base are partially grown together; retrolateral row with 10 teeth; intermediate area with approx. 32 small teeth. Maxillae: 4.48 long and 3.67 wide; at least 150-170 strongly developed cuspules along entire anterior margin (Fig. 5E View Figure 5 ). Labium: 4 long and 2.27 wide on the base; conical; at least 60 cuspules (Fig. 5E View Figure 5 ); anterior pair of sigilla reach labiosternal junction; labiosternal junction clearly developed (Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ). Sternum: 6.32 long and 5.7 wide; oval (Fig. 5C View Figure 5 ); setae of various length somewhat densely but disordered along the margin and a similar amount of setae of various sizes spread evenly over the sternum; 4 pairs of sigilla, anterior pair small and hardly visible, second pair (anterior-posterior) smallest and divided in circles, third pair larger than second and roughly in the shape of an elongated oval, and posterior pair biggest (roughly 4 times the size of the third pair); all sigilla depressed, two anterior pairs just slightly, two posterior pairs strongly. Abdomen: 10.87 long and 9.12 wide; surface covered with horizontal wrinkles and dense setae (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ); PLS 2.84 long and 1.5 wide; PMS 1.43 long and 0.6 wide. Pedipalp: Length of trochanter 1.5, femur 4.62, patella 1.79, tibia 3.23, tarsus 2.96; approx. 17 spines spread prolateral, retrolateral and ventral on tarsus. Genitalia: one pair of simple and rounded spermathecae, sperm ducts relatively short (Fig. 6A-E View Figure 6 ). Legs: densely covered in brown setae of various sizes on all sides of the legs and bent towards the exterior with the exceptions of some long, dorsal setae on tibia, metatarsus and tarsus. Leg spination: leg I: tibia rv0, v0, pl0, d0; metatarsus rv1, v2, pl0, d0; tarsus rv6, v13, pl6, d0; leg II: tibia rv0, v0, pl0, d0; metatarsus rv1, v3, pl0, d0; tarsus rv6, v11, pl3, d0; leg III: tibia rv1, v0, pl2, d8; metatarsus rv0, v1, pl0, d18; tarsus rv7, v11, pl7, d6; leg IV: tibia rv0, v0, pl1, d5; metatarsus rv0, v3, pl4, d2; tarsus rv1, v15, pl9, d3; patellae I and II aspinose; patella III with ca. 28 spines prolateral to dorsal (Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ); patella IV with ca. 18 spines prolateral to dorsal (Fig. 5G View Figure 5 ). Leg measurement: leg I: femur 5.2, patella 2.16, tibia 3.4, metatarsus 2.5, tarsus 1.93, total 15.19. leg II: femur 5.32, patella 2.54, tibia 3.02, metatarsus 2.86, tarsus 2.04, total 15.78. leg III: femur 5.03, patella 2.64, tibia 2.39, metatarsus 3.08, tarsus 2.15, total 15.29. leg IV: femur 5.6, patella 2.61, tibia 3.66, metatarsus 3.31, tarsus 2.24, total 17.42. Formula: 4>2>3>1.
Etymology.
The specific epithet is a patronym in honour of the senior author’s husband, David A. Greenberg.
Distribution.
Pilbara region of Western Australia, excluding the northern Pilbara subregion, extending into the Little Sandy Desert region. The known linear range of this species is 295 km (Fig. 7 View Figure 7 ).
Genetic structure.
The species is highly structured across its range with four genetic clades that have sympatric distributions (Figs 2 View Figure 2 , 7 View Figure 7 ).
Remarks.
This species had been labelled “MYG045” in previous barcoding studies ( Castalanelli et al. 2014).
Variability.
Assessment of 19 characters in male M. davidi sp. nov. and 18 characters in females (Table 1 View Table 1 ) highlights substantial variation in many characters within and between sampling localities, in both the male and female specimens examined.
In both sexes there is substantial variation in body colouration. In males, the chelicera and pars cephalica ranged from a bright red (specimen WAM T119729; Fig. 13A View Figure 13 ) to a red with a shade of orange (male: T120081; Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ) whereas abdominal colour in dorsal varied between green, purple and blue metallic tones to no metallic sheen at all (Fig. 13G-H View Figure 13 ). Colouration of the pars thoracica ranged from light brown (T119733) to nearly black (T119731) and the orange to olive transition on the sternum and coxa was also highly variable (compare T84005; Fig. 13F View Figure 13 with T113596; Fig. 13E View Figure 13 ). In females, cheliceral colouration ranged between dark red (T116874; Fig. 14A View Figure 14 ) to a light orange (T119979 or T116776; Fig. 14B View Figure 14 ). The abdomen in some specimens had a metallic sheen and the sternum varied between uniformly orange (T116776; Fig. 14F View Figure 14 ) to a full transition from orange to dark red (T119711; Fig. 14G View Figure 14 ). Colour of legs and pars thoracica ranged between light brown (T116776) to dark brown (T125308). The colour variations still hold true if considering possible artefacts of preservation, i.e. varying trapping liquids, ethanol concentration during storage, and time of preservation.
Variability was also high in rastellum spination and cuspule counts. Some male specimens had about twice as many rastellum spines (Fig. 13L, M View Figure 13 ) and/or cuspules on both maxillae and labium than others. Female variability was even higher with some specimens having up to four times more maxillary cuspules (Fig. 14H, I View Figure 14 ) or nearly five times more spines on the rastellum (17; Fig. 14N, O View Figure 14 ) than others. The spination of the patellae was also variable which included spinal counts, size, and positioning of the individual spines. While male specimens showed variation on the first, third and fourth patella, females only had spines on the third and fourth patella (see Table 1 View Table 1 for details). The shape of the sternum in females varied considerably between ovoid and round, and the shape, size and position of the sternal sigilla differed substantially (Fig. 14F, G View Figure 14 ). The second pair of sigilla was subdivided into two depressions in some female specimens but not in others. Variation in body size was also substantial (Fig. 15 View Figure 15 ) and the carapace length ranged from 3.58 to 4.74 in males and 5.12 to 8.97 in females.
Eye ratio of the PLE and PME pair width in relation to the ALE pair width varied less than other characters. While still showing variation in males and females its range was less extreme (within 8% in males and 16% in females) than in other characters (Figs 13I-K View Figure 13 , 14J-M View Figure 14 ; see boxplot Fig. 16 View Figure 16 ). Male bulb structure also varied little (Fig. 3 H, I View Figure 3 ).
There was no correlation between geographical distance of samples and morphological divergence. For example, two females of the clade III ( WAM T126260 and T126264) from one locality showed substantial differences in the number of rastellum spines (9 vs 17 respectively), which was also notable for four male specimens of the clades II and III (T119726-T119729) from the same location (4 to 10 spines). Similar results were inferred for cuspule count in these males (55 to 80 cuspules on the maxillae).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |