Pseudopoda qizimeishanensis Zhang, J. Liu & Hu, 2024

Chang, Jian, Zhang, He, Liu, Jie, Zhu, Yang, Liu, Changyong, Chen, Kuai & Hu, Changhao, 2024, Three new species of Pseudopoda Jäger, 2000 (Araneae, Sparassidae, Heteropodinae) from Qizimeishan National Nature Reserve of Hubei, China, ZooKeys 1214, pp. 143-160 : 143-160

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1214.130101

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:255A2F6A-23F8-4793-8303-050168CB5D9D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13887117

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/70F158B3-D851-5EED-AEA3-08964ADD207A

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Pseudopoda qizimeishanensis Zhang, J. Liu & Hu
status

sp. nov.

Pseudopoda qizimeishanensis Zhang, J. Liu & Hu sp. nov.

Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 , 10 View Figure 10

Type material.

Holotype • male: China, Hubei Province: Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Xuan’en County, Changtanhe Dong Autonomous Township, Qizimeishan National Nature Reserve , Qizimeishan Mountain ; 30 ° 1 ' 45.19 " N, 109 ° 43 ' 45.42 " E; elev. 1270 m; 6–11 July 2023; Changhao Hu & Mian Wei leg. ( CBEE, QZMS 00902 ) GoogleMaps . Paratypes • 8 males and 10 females, with same data as for holotype ( CBEE, QZMS 02441 QZMS 02458 ) GoogleMaps .

Etymology.

The specific epithet is derived from the type locality, the Qizimeishan Mountain; adjective.

Diagnosis.

The male of P. qizimeishanensis Zhang, J. Liu & Hu , sp. nov. resembles that of P. baoshanensis Zhang, Jäger & Liu, 2023 (cf. fig. 4 A – C vs. fig. 26 A – C in Zhang et al. 2023) by having the expanded E, but can be recognised by: 1) RTA long, arising basally from Ti; 2) T without prolaterad outgrowth; and 3) tip of E pointing 11 o’clock (vs. RTA short, arising medially from Ti, T with prolaterad outgrowth, tip of E pointing 7 o’clock in P. baoshanensis ). The female of P. qizimeishanensis Zhang, J. Liu & Hu , sp. nov. resembles that of P. nanyueensis Tang & Yin, 2000 (cf. fig. 5 A – C vs. figs 2, 3 in Tang and Yin 2000) by: 1) anterior margins of LL V-shaped; 2) anterior margins of LL parallel to posterior margins of LL, but can be recognised by: S long, with wrinkles, almost parallel to anterior margins of LL (vs. S without wrinkles, extending horizontal in P. nanyueensis ).

Male: Measurements: Medium-sized. Body length 14.9, DS length 7.7, width 6.6; OS length 6.8, width 4.8. Eyes: AME 0.29, ALE 0.42, PME 0.25, PLE 0.39, AME – AME 0.26, AME – ALE 0.17, PME – PME 0.46, PME – PLE 0.59, AME – PME 0.37, ALE – PLE 0.39, CH AME 0.72, CH ALE 0.66. Spination: Pp 131, 101, 2111; Fe I – II 323, III 322, IV 321; Pa I – III 101, IV 000; Ti I – II 2226, III – IV 2126; Mt I – II 2024, III 3025, IV 3036. Measurements of palp and legs: Pp 10.1 (3.3, 1.7, 1.9, –, 3.2), I 33.2 (9.3, 3.0, 9.0, 8.9, 3.0), II 34.8 (9.9, 2.8, 9.5, 9.5, 3.1), III 26.6 (7.7, 2.2, 7.3, 7.0, 2.4), IV 29.5 (8.5, 2.2, 7.7, 8.6, 2.5). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Promargin of chelicerae with three teeth, retromargin with four teeth, cheliceral furrow with c. 26 denticles.

Palp (Fig. 4 A – C View Figure 4 ): As in diagnosis. C membranous, arising from T at 11 o’clock position. E expanded and plate-like, arising from T at 9 o’clock position; embolic tip curved. RTA arising basally from Ti; vRTA triangular; dRTA long, with two thin teeth in retrolateral view.

Colouration (Fig. 6 A, B View Figure 6 ): DS yellow, with black spots. Ventral legs with black spots. Dorsal OS brown, ventral OS with black spots, spinnerets yellow, with two parallel longitudinal lines of lighter dots.

Female: Measurements: Medium-sized. Body length 16.9, DS length 7.9, width 7.1; OS length 8.6, width 6.6. Eyes: AME 0.33, ALE 0.51, PME 0.31, PLE 0.42, AME – AME 0.32, AME – ALE 0.27, PME – PME 0.58, PME – PLE 0.64, AME – PME 0.44, ALE – PLE 0.41, CH AME 0.60, CH ALE 0.58. Spination: Pp 131, 101, 2121, 1014; Fe I – II 323, III 322, IV 321; Pa I – IV 101; Ti I – IV 2026; Mt I 1014, II – III 2024, IV 3025. Measurements of palp and legs: Pp 9.2 (2.8, 1.1, 2.1, –, 3.2), I 25.6 (7.0, 2.9, 7.0, 6.4, 2.3), II 26.9 (7.9, 2.8, 7.2, 6.8, 2.2), III 22.3 (7.0, 2.7, 5.4, 5.2, 2.0), IV 24.6 (7.6, 2.3, 5.9, 6.5, 2.3). Leg formula: II-I-IV-III. Promargin of chelicerae with three teeth, retromargin with four teeth, cheliceral furrow with c. 26 denticles.

Epigyne (Fig. 5 A – C View Figure 5 ): As in diagnosis. EF as wide as long, with obvious AB. Anterior margins of LL V-shaped. S long and anterolaterally pointed, with wrinkles. FW covering entire S. FD narrow.

Colouration (Fig. 6 C – D View Figure 6 ): As in males, but darker and with a transverse white patch in posterior part of dorsal OS.

Distribution.

China (Hubei Province) (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ).

OS

Oregon State University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Sparassidae

SubFamily

Heteropodinae

Genus

Pseudopoda