Protearomyia nigra (Meigen, 1826)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3796.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E82D30A9-9A96-4F53-9F96-5531995EB690 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6123067 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6F2F746D-FF80-983B-83F3-FF6FFD0CFC96 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Protearomyia nigra (Meigen, 1826) |
status |
|
Protearomyia nigra (Meigen, 1826) View in CoL
This species was re-described by McAlpine (1983), additional notes are provided here on the structure of the male genitalia.
Male terminalia ( Figs.18–21 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ). Epandrium approximately 1.5x higher than wide, ventral lobe at least 1.5x higher than wide, although a group of setulae are present at the posterioventral corner, they are not long and curved and are not bourne on a small rounded process ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ). McAlpine (1983) states that the “cerci are strongly sclerotized at apices” but the small fleshy cerci are fused to the hypoproct apically thus leading to this confusion. Surstylus with two prominent prensisetae posteroventrally. Hypoproct in form of a long, curving rod reaching up through the centre of the epandrium, in posterior view ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ) its apex is star-shaped with a pair of lateral projections, and two straight, simple apical processes extending ventrally. This feature was also illustrated by McAlpine (1983, Fig. 30 View FIGURES 27 – 31 ). Phallus ( Figs. 20 & 21 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ) J-shaped, basal plate relatively narrow and tall with lateral processes only slightly projecting, apical section long and sinuous, alignment and amount of curvature varying between specimens. Phallic guide as a simple U-shaped structure, basally with a pair of small ventrally directed, rounded processes ( Figs. 20 & 21 View FIGURES 18 – 21 ).
Differential diagnosis.: Males are easily distinguished from other Palearctic Protearomyia in that ventral lobe of the epandrium is rectangular in shape rather than square, approximately 25% higher than it is wide. The shape of the apex of the hypoproct is also a diagnostic feature.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |