Hoplopisthius (Pseudotaphroderes) maximus, Mantilleri, Antoine, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.196132 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6207468 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6E4F87A8-FF94-7868-A4B9-FC503E98BC84 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hoplopisthius (Pseudotaphroderes) maximus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Hoplopisthius (Pseudotaphroderes) maximus View in CoL n. sp.
Holotype. Ψ, "Mailu, Brit. N. G., July 1895, Anthony, Muséum Paris, 1952, coll. R. Oberthür, Prép. micro. n°AM00076, Hoplopisthius (P.) maximus n. sp., Holotype, MNHN EC 1151", in MNHN.
Paratypes. 1 Ψ, Nouv. Guinée, Baie de Geelvink, Raffray & Maindron 1878, MNHN EC 1152 ( MNHN); 1 Ψ, New Ireland Pr., N. Ireland, Lelet Plat., 5 km SE Kamiraba, 600–800 m, 03°15'33''S – 151°55'32''E, 11.III.2000, leg A. Weigel ( NME); 1 ɗ and 1 Ψ, New Britain, Mt Sinewit, 3500 ft, 27.6– 17.9.1963, W. W. Brandt ( ANIC).
Description. Total length: 9.1–12.0 mm. Width across humeral calli: 1.3–1.9 mm. Body red-brown without darker elytral area. Habitus of type: Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17 – 19 .
Head ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 83 – 90 ) as long as broad, shiny, hardly punctate. Vertex and frons with a superficial groove. Metarostrum hardly grooved. Prorostrum 0.30–0.35 as long as head + metarostrum + mesorostrum. Antennomere 3 hardly conical, slightly longer than broad; antennomeres 4–8 subcylindrical, as long as broad; 11th 1.75–2.00 longer than 10th. Venter of head with a very weak median groove.
Pronotum shiny, smooth. Prosternellum distinct. Underside of first protarsal segment denticulate ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 83 – 90 ). Metasternum smooth, convex, shiny, not deeply grooved. Interstria 3 abruptly stopped before apical declivity but not forming a sharp tooth ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 83 – 90 ); interstria 8 only present on the rear part of elytra. External border of apical "forceps" without small tooth at base; inner side of apical "forceps" with a short median tooth in female ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 83 – 90 ), the tooth much weaker in male.
Sternites III–IV of female ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 83 – 90 ) very convex, shiny, not grooved nor depressed. Tergite VII of female ( Fig. 88 View FIGURES 83 – 90 ) with long hair. Apical teeth of tergite VIII almost missing ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 83 – 90 ). Gonopods IX: Fig. 87 View FIGURES 83 – 90 . Spermatheca: Fig. 90 View FIGURES 83 – 90 . Sternites III–IV of male convex, longitudinally grooved.
Distribution. This species is presently known only from New Guinea ( Indonesia and Papua-New- Guinea), New Ireland and New Britain.
Etymology. The epithet " maximus " refers to the large size of individuals of this species.
Remarks. Both the holotype and the female paratype in the MNHN collection were erroneously identified. Damoiseau thought the holotype belonged to Carcinopisthius loriae Senna & Calabresi , and Kleine identified the female paratype as Carcinopisthius oberthueri (Senna) . Distribution map: Fig. 99 View FIGURE 99 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Hoplopisthius |