Dicotylophyllum sp. 1

Kovar-Eder, Johanna, Kvaček, Zlatko, Teodoridis, Vasilis, Mazouch, Petr & Collinson, Margaret E., 2022, Floristic, Vegetation And Climate Assessment Of The Early / Middle Miocene Parschlug Flora Indicates A Distinctly Seasonal Climate, Fossil Imprint 78 (1), pp. 80-144 : 88

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2022.005

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6E40384F-924B-CE5D-5A13-DEA0AEBE4F8A

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Dicotylophyllum sp. 1
status

 

Dicotylophyllum sp. 1

Pl. 2, Fig. 19

2004 Dicotylophyllum sp. 1 ; Kovar-Eder et al., p. 88, pl. 15, fig. 1.

A d d i t i o n a l m a t e r i a l. cf. GBA 2005/0004/0024.

D e s c r i p t i o n. Leaves alternate, shortly petiolate; lamina narrow elliptic to obovate, l × w up to 62 (inferred) × 18 mm, ratio l/w about 3–3.4, base narrow cuneate to decurrent, apex incomplete, emarginate (GBA 2005/0004/0024); margin entire near base, upper two thirds widely simply serrate, teeth triangular, sinus acute to rounded, apex bluntly acute to rounded; midvein straight or bent: secondaries delicate, semicraspedodromous, densely spaced, at moderate angles, rather straight, looping near margin; veinlets entering teeth; higher order veins not preserved.

R e m a r k s. The apex is only preserved in specimen GBA 2005/0004/0024. Whether the emarginate apex resulted from damage is uncertain.

Differing from Dicotylophyllum sp. G by the secondary veins which are not diverging towards the leaf margin.

Differing from Dicotylophyllum sp. M by the straight course of the secondaries.

Differing from Dicotylophyllum sp. T by elliptic shape, entire margin near base and less sharp teeth.

Differing from leaflets of Engelhardia orsbergensis by symmetry, cuneate base, broader shape and broader teeth.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF