Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ( Fabricius, 1781 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3892.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:30C7AE6D-D6AB-4777-B6A3-9760BBB95741 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C5587D2-D955-2E74-FF24-F906F9F7FB71 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ( Fabricius, 1781 ) |
status |
|
Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ( Fabricius, 1781) View in CoL
( Figs 170–182 View FIGURE 170 View FIGURES 171–181 View FIGURE 182 , 219 View FIGURES 216–219 , 220 View FIGURES 220–223 )
Reduvius quinquespinosus Fabricius 1781: 382 ; Fabricius 1787: 313; Fabricius 1794: 206; Wolff 1800: 39.
Zelus quinquespinosus: Fabricius 1803: 286 .
Acanthaspis flavipes Stål 1855: 187 View in CoL .
Acanthaspis quinquespinosa: Stål 1866: 241 View in CoL ; Stål 1874: 72; Lethierry & Severin 1896: 105; Distant 1904: 257; Bergroth 1915: 178; Hsiao & Ren 1981: 455; Maldonado-Capriles 1990: 387; Putshkov & Putshkov 1996: 186.
Redescription. Colouration. Dark brown to black. Eyes and second antennal segment brown; ocelli light yellow; first antennal segment, rostrum, spots next to ocellar area, legs and abdomen reddish brown; humeral angles and
discal spines (including the area around them) of posterior pronotal lobe, base and subapical spots of corium, posterior half of connexival segments yellow; tarsi yellowish brown; size of light spots on pronotum and forewings shows intraspecific variability ( Figs 170 View FIGURE 170 , 219 View FIGURES 216–219 , 220 View FIGURES 220–223 ), generally posterior pronotal lobe with four separated yellow spots, two discal ones smaller, sometimes two discal spots very small, in some individuals two discal spots each connected with lateral spots, even four spots may connected.
Structure. Medium sized. Rostrum and first antennal segment clothed with short setae; ventral side of head, pronotum, scutellum with brown setae; coxae and thochanters with dense short and long setae; femora and tibiae with yellow long setae; ventral abdomen with short golden shining setae. Head oblong, anteocular portion about two times as long as postocular; long longitudinal depression between eyes deep; mandibular plate between antennifers much higher than anteclypeus, apex right-angled, forming a breach together with base of anteclypeus; maxillary plate tumid and produced anteriad; base of gena rounded; transverse constriction anteriad to ocellar area wide and deep; postocular portion rounded; there is a shallow longitudinal depression between the large, rounded ocelli; first visible rostral segment slightly longer than second segment; first antennal segment shorter than head, cylindrical ( Figs 170 View FIGURE 170 , 171 View FIGURES 171–181 ). Collar processes prominent, anterior margin nearly straight; gyriform elevations of anterior lobe with fine wrinkles; posterior lobe flat in middle, then gradually declivous; humeral angles long, straight, sharp; discal portion with two long erect processes smaller than humeral processes, sometimes two discal processes tuberculate-shaped, even indistinct in some individuals. Scutellum flat in middle, wrinkled, apical spine long. Hemelytron of male reaching or surpassing, of female nearly reaching abdominal apex. Paramere clubshaped, apical portion right-angled curved, apical part without setae and slender, apex rounded or truncated ( Figs 176–178 View FIGURES 171–181 ); pygophore without median process, slightly swollen, with two small processes laterally ( Figs 172–174 View FIGURES 171–181 ); basal plate thick; basal plate bridge slender and long ( Fig. 175 View FIGURES 171–181 ); pedicel thick, slightly shorter than basal plate; dorsal phallothecal sclerite V-shaped, laterally strongly sclerotized, apex convex; struts fused, reaching subapical portion of phallosoma; endosoma with a median asymmetrical sclerotized endosomal process, pointed at right side ( Figs 179–181 View FIGURES 171–181 ). Female with visible eighth abdominal tergite narrow and broad, posterior margin nearly straight; ninth and tenth terga not completely fused, tenth tergite darker than ninth, the later flat; first valvifer narrow and broad, visible part of first valvula just reaching ninth tergite, apex blunt with dense setae; styloid visible from dorsal view, apex sharp.
Measurements [in mm, ♂ (n= 16) / ♀ (n= 21)]. Body length 15.2–20.5/16.5–21.2; maximum width of abdomen 4.5–6.5/4.6–6.7; Head length 2.4–2.9/2.5–3.4; length of anteocular part 1.2–1.4/1.62–1.8; length of postocular part 0.4–0.5/0.47–0.52; length of synthlipsis 0.94–1.0/0.89–0.91; interocellar space 0.18–0.2/ 0.15–0.172; length of antennal segments I–IV= 2.2–2.7/1.56–2.78, 3.4–4.92/3.7–4.2, 5.2–6.8/5.3–6.7, 2.1–2.4/ 2.3–2.6; length of visible rostral segments I–III= 1.31–1.43/1.33–1.41, 1.0–1.2/1.14–1.22, 0.6–0.67/0.64–0.65; length of anterior lobe of pronotum 1.4–1.9/1.5–2.1; length of posterior lobe of pronotum 1.85–2.1/2.2–2.7; maximum width of thorax 4.3–6.2/5.5; length of scutellum 2.2–2.7/2.13–2.71; length of hemelytron 10.5–13.3/ 10.3–13.2.
Type material. Syntype (s), from “ India orientalis” [= East Indies], BMNH. According to Zimsen (1964), the type specimens of this species are deposited in the BMNH .
Other materials examined. 1♂, “ China, Tibet, Metog” ( SEM) . 1♀, “ Nepal, Adhabar Terai Forest , 24.IV.1968, T. Kumata ” ( EIAU) . 1♂, “ India, Coimbatore , X.1971, Nathan” ( NMNST) . 1♀, 1♂, “ N. Khasia; 15.v.(19)03(?); (Chennell?)”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ Ceylon (green)”; “534”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ N. Khasia, Brr; Wzorr (?); (Chennell(?))”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 1♂, 1♀, “ Bombay Leith ”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383”; “ quinquespinosa Fab. ” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ Bvr (?) Ghal (hrsem(?))”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “Pegu” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ Palon, ( Pegu ),; L. Fea; VIII-IX.(19)87” “235”; “Museo Civ. Genova”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ quinquespinosa Fabr ; Bombay, 520”; “520, presented by Walter Elliot Esq.”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa , Walker’s Catal” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ Sikkim ”; “ Acanthaspis flavipes ” (BMNH) . 1♀, “ Assam ”; “Atkinson Coll. 02-6”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ” (BMNH) . 1♂, “ Sikkim ”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “Lchor-daga (?)” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “S. India, Bombay”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ Ceylon, Tangalla ; 4.1902”; “1049”; “Distant Coll. 1911-383” ( BMNH) . 3♂, “ Khasia Hills , 96-135”; “upper pink label without word”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa Fabr. ; M. L. Cook det. 1974” ( BMNH) . 2♀, 4♂, “ Khasia Hills , 96-135”; “yellow label without word”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa Fabr. ; M. L. Cook det. 1974” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ Khasia Hills , 96-135”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa Fabr. ; M. L. Cook det. 1974” ( BMNH) . 2ex [abdomen missing, sex unknown], “ Khasia Hills , 96-135”; “yellow label without word”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa Fabr. ; M. L. Cook det. 1974” ( BMNH) . “ India, Karnataka, Hebbal Bangalore ; 03.X.1981; Rama H. N. Coll. ”; “ Acanthaspis xerampilina Dist. ”; “7” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ India, Karnataka, Bangalore, Gkvk (?), 916 m; 03.II.1996; A. J. Hloz Coll. ”; “ Acanthaspis vincta Dist. ”; “8” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ Berhampur ”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa Fabr. ; M. L. Cook det. 1974” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ India; Harwood Coll., B. M. 1945-120” ( BMNH) . 2♂, “ South India; V. Campbell Coll., B. M. 1930-599” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ South India; V. Campbell Coll., B. M. 1930-599”; “1984; A. quinquespinosa, CB, S. India; T. V. Campbell ” ( BMNH) . 1ex [abdomen missing, sex unknown], “ Assam ”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa Fabr. ; M. L. Cook det. 1974” ( BMNH) . 1♀, “ India, Bandra; Dr. Jayakar; 1905-152” ( BMNH) . 2♀, “ South India, Tamil Nadu, Tirunelveli ”; “ vii.1988; D. Ambrose ” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “CB”; “ South India; T. V. Campbell Coll.; B. M. 1930-599” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ Bangalore , Mysore; June 94” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ Mysore ; H. K. Slater, 1901-182” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “N. India ”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ; Walker’s Catal” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ E. In [eastern India]/ 58, 60”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ; Walker’s Catal” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ E. In [eastern India]/ 58, 60”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ; Walker’s Catal”; “ Acanthaspis 6= guttata A. H.; Acanthaspis 4= guttata Fab.; Mus: Banks (?)” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “ Assam, W. F. Badgley; 1906-185”; “34”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa Fabr. ; M. L. Cook det. 1974” ( BMNH) . 1♂, “pink label without word” ( BMNH) .
Distribution in China. Tibet (Metog) ( Fig. 182 View FIGURE 182 ).
Distribution outside China. India, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka.
Remarks. China (1940) listed this species from China without any further detail. Hoffmann (1944) recorded it from Hainan Island; however, the specimen (“Loh-fung-tung, Yai Dist.; Feb. 27–28, 1935; F. K. To.”; “ Acanthaspis quinquespinosa, Hoffmann det.” currently deposited at Entomological Museum of Sun Yat-Sen University), on which he based, is actually Acanthaspis geniculata Hsiao. We considered the record of this species in Hainan as improbable.
There are another two species ( A. angularis Stål and A. flavipes Stål ) with the similar colour pattern of A. quinquespinosa , but their male genitalia are different. Acanthaspis quinquespinosa is a common species and well illustrated by Distant (1904).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Acanthaspis quinquespinosa ( Fabricius, 1781 )
Cao, Liangming, Rédei, Dávid, Li, Hu & Cai, Wanzhi 2014 |
Acanthaspis quinquespinosa: Stål 1866: 241
Putshkov, P. V. & Putshkov, V. G. 1996: 186 |
Maldonado-Capriles, J. 1990: 387 |
Hsiao, T. Y. & Ren, S. Z. 1981: 455 |
Bergroth, E. 1915: 178 |
Lethierry, L. & Severin, G. 1896: 105 |
Stal, C. 1874: 72 |
Stal, C. 1866: 241 |
Acanthaspis flavipes Stål 1855: 187
Stal, C. 1855: 187 |
Zelus quinquespinosus:
Fabricius, J. C. 1803: 286 |
Reduvius quinquespinosus
Wolff, J. F. 1800: 39 |
Fabricius, J. C. 1794: 206 |
Fabricius, J. C. 1787: 313 |
Fabricius, J. C. 1781: 382 |