Cryptonura dohezarensis Arbea, Yahyapour & Shayanmehr, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5087.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B167675B-591E-486A-AB83-0265D0864278 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5824065 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C3E87F2-FFDE-FFB2-B5B7-7CF7FBB8FAE0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cryptonura dohezarensis Arbea, Yahyapour & Shayanmehr |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cryptonura dohezarensis Arbea, Yahyapour & Shayanmehr View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 1−15 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 7–15 , Tab. 1a & b View TABLE 1
Type locality. Iran, Mazandaran Province, Tonekabon county, Dohezar forest , 36º40ʹ21.7ʺ N, 50º49ʹ28.5ʺ E, 443 m a.s.l. GoogleMaps
Type material. Holotype: female on slide in MNCN. Iran: Mazandaran Province, Tonekabon county, Dohezar forest , 10 November 2016, soil and leaf litter, Berlese extraction, Eliye Yahyapour leg. Paratype: juvenile on slide in SANRU, same data as for holotype .
Etymology. The species was named after the type locality, Dohezar forest.
Diagnosis. Habitus typical of the genus Cryptonura . Body without pigment, 2+2 eyes darkly pigmented. Dorsal tubercles present and well developed, roundish in shape. Buccal cone rather long, labrum ogival. Head with tubercles Af and Cl separated. With chaetae A, B, C, D and E. Chaeta O absent. Tubercles Dl and (L+So) on head with 5 and 8 chaetae respectively. Tubercle Di on Th I with 1 chaeta. Tubercles De on Th II and III with 2+s and 3+s chaetae respectively. Tubercles L on Abd III and IV with 3 and 6 chaetae respectively. Macrochaetae Ml relatively long. Cryptopygy present, poorly developed. Claw without inner tooth.
Description. Habitus typical of the genus. Head and tergite tubercles weakly developed, differentiated in small bosses, with tertiary granulation. Body length (without antennae): 1.6 mm in the holotype. Body without pigment. 2+2 eyes relatively small (diameter of ocellus slightly longer than diameter of alveolus Ocp), darkly pigmented.
Chaetal morphology. Dorsal ordinary chaetae of five types: Macrochaetae Ml relatively long, strongly thickened, almost cylindrical, arclike or straight, narrowly sheathed, apically rounded; lateral macrochaetae longer, less serrated and thinner apically; short macrochaetae Mc and Mcc thickened, straight and blunt; macrochaetae densely covered by minute denticles. Mesochaetae smooth or feebly serrated and pointed. Smooth microchaetae shorter, acuminate and thin. S-chaetae of tergites thin, smooth and longer than closest Mc ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ).
Ventral side of head: Vi=6, Ve=11 (4 Vea, 3 Vem and 4 Vep).
Antenna: Ant I, II with 7, 10- 11 chaetae.
Ant III with 16 ordinary chaetae (5 ve, 3 vc, 4 vi and 4 d), 5 S-chaetae (AIIIO).
Ant IV dorsally with the complete set of chaetae (or, 8 S, i, 12 mou, 3 brs).
Ant IV ventrally with the complete set of chaetae (3 brs, 2iv; ap: 7bs, 4miA; ca:2 bs, 3 miA; cm: 3 bs, 1 miA; cp: 8 miA, 1 brs).
Antennae. Antennae shorter than head. Chaetotaxy of antennae as in Tab. 1a View TABLE 1 and in Figs 8−9 View FIGURES 7–15 . Ant I with 7 chaetae: 2 long (Ml) and three shorter (Mc) thick and ciliate, others smooth. Ant II with 10−11 chaetae: 2 long thick and ciliate setae (Ml), and others smooth. Ant III and IV dorsally fused. Ant III with 16 ordinary chaetae (group d with 4 chaetae) and 5 S-chaetae of AIIIO, guard chaetae Sgv longer and slender than Sgd. Eight subequal S-chaetae (S1–S8) on Ant IV, S1 thinner and S4 slighlty stouter than others ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–6 ); Ant IV organite as a very small rod, almost entirely burried in the integument; apical bulb simple or feebly lobed, fused to Ant IV tip.
Mouthparts. Buccal cone elongated. Labrum pointed, with ventral sclerifications ogival as in Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 . Labrum with 0/2, 2 smooth chaetae of different sizes, prelabral chaetae absent ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 7–15 ). Labium with 11 chaetae: a1, a2, p2, E, F, G, b, c, d, e and f. Labial papillae x not detected ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Maxilla styliform, mandible thin tridentate.
Dorsal chaetotaxy and tubercles. Chaetotaxy of head as in Tab. 1a View TABLE 1 and Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–6 and 11−12 View FIGURES 7–15 , with 12 chaetal groups: Cl, Af, 2 Oc, 2 Di, 2 De, 2 Dl, 2 (L+So); tubercles Cl and Af separate ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 7–15 ); chaeta A distinctly shorter than B chaeta; chaeta D free; O absent; tubelem BE present; tubercle Dl with 5 chaetae, chaeta Dl6 absent ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7–15 ); tubercle (L+So) with 8 chaetae, chaetae L2 and L3 absent ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7–15 ). Chaetotaxy of Th and Abd as in Tab. 1b View TABLE 1 and in Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–6 , 7 and 13–14 View FIGURES 7–15 . Number of tubercles from Th I to Abd VI on half notum is: 3,4,4/4,4,4,4,2,1. S-chaetotaxic formula on Th I to Abd V as 0,2+ms,2/1,1,1,1,1; body s-chaeta thin and smooth, slightly longer than closest Mc ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 7–15 ). Tubercles Di on Th I with 1 chaeta; tubercles Di on Th II–III with 3 chaetae, chaetae Di3 free ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–15 ); chaetae De2 on Th II–III and De3 on Th III and Abd I–III connected with tubercle De ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 7–15 ); tubercle L on Abd III and IV with 3 and 6 chaetae respectively; tubercles Di on Abd V with chaetae Di3 as mi, Di2 as Mc or mi and Di1 as Ml ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 7–15 ). Cryptopygy poorly developed; Abd VI hardly visible from dorsal side ( Figs 2−3 View FIGURES 1–6 ).
Ventral chaetotaxy. On head, groups Vea, Vem and Vep with 4,3,4 chaetae respectively; group Vi with 6 chaetae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–15 ). On Abd IV, furcal vestige with 5 chaetae, devoid of mi but with a small posterior area of primary granulation. Ventral chaetae Vl and L' on Abd V present ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ).
Legs. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Tab. 1b View TABLE 1 .Tibiotarsi with chaetae B4 and B5 short. Claw without inner tooth ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ).
Ratios. Chaetae A: B: Ocm: Ocp: Di1 on Abd IV: Di1 on Abd V: Claw III = 12: 30: 27: 20: 50: 36: 10.
Remarks. Within the genus Cryptonura , C. dohezarensis sp. nov. most closely resembles C. persica Smolis et al. 2012 from Iran. Both taxa have similar chaetotaxy of central area of the head (chaetae A, C and D present), maxilla and mandible shape, the number of chaetae Di on Th I, similar dorsal chaetotaxy of abdomen (see Tab. 5 View TABLE 5 ). However, they clearly differ in the body colour (in C. dohezarensis , white; in C. persica , blue), the shape of dorsal tubercles (in C. dohezarensis , rounded; in C. persica , triangular), the fusion of Cl and Af tubercles on head (in C. dohezarensis , separate; in C. persica , fused) and the number of Di chaetae on Th II–III (in C. dohezarensis , 3; in C. persica , 2).
C. dohezarensis sp. nov. is also similar to two species without body pigment and with rounded dorsal tubercles: C. anthrenoidea ( Ellis, 1976) from Greece and C. jubilaria Smolis, 2002 from Poland. Nevertheless, the new species can be easily distinguished from them by the number of L+So chaetae on head (in C. dohezarensis , 8, in C. anthrenoidea and C. jubilaria , 7), the number of L chaetae on Abd IV (in C. dohezarensis , 6, in C. anthrenoidea and C. jubilaria , 5) and a combination of characters: unguis without inner tooth, mandible with 3 teeth, 6 Vi ventral chaetae on head, chaetae C, D and E present on head, 3 Di chaetae on Abd V and 5 De+Dl+L ordinary chaetae on Abd V. The main diagnostic characters of these species are summarized in Tab. 5 View TABLE 5 .
Dorsal tubercle | Number of chaetae | Types of chaetae | Names of chaetae |
---|---|---|---|
Af | 4 | Ml | F |
Mcc | G | ||
Cl | 8(10) | Ml | B |
Mc | A | ||
mi | C, D, (E) | ||
Oc | 3 | Ml | Ocm |
Mc | Ocp | ||
mi | Oca | ||
Di | 2 | Ml | Di1 |
Mc | Di2 | ||
De | 2 | Ml | De1 |
Mc/mi | De2 | ||
Dl | 5 | Ml | Dl1, Dl5 |
Mc | Dl3, Dl4 | ||
mi | Dl2 | ||
(L+So) | 8 | Ml | L1, L4, So1 |
me | So3–6 | ||
mi | L2 |
MNCN |
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |