Liotipoma mutabilis, Mclean, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/z2012n2a10 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C26A814-FF8E-1462-DA35-7D8B6E83F7B6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Liotipoma mutabilis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Liotipoma mutabilis View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 4 View FIG ; 5 View FIG )
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype: LIFOU 2000, stn 1435, Loyalty Islands, Lifou Island, Santal Bay , 20°55.2’S, 167°00.7’E, 5-30 m, diving team, 8.XI.2000, ♂ shell, H 3.4, D 5.7 mm ( MNHN 24757 About MNHN , Fig. 4 View FIG A-D). GoogleMaps
Paratypes: LIFOU 2000, stn 1436, Loyalty Islands, Lifou Island, Gaatcha Bay, Santal Bay , 20°55.5’N, 167°04.2’E, 10-20 m, diving team, 10.XI.2000, ♂ shell, H 3.0, D 5.1 mm ( MNHH 24758 , Fig. 4 View FIG E-H) GoogleMaps ; ♀ shell, H 3.2, D 4.8 mm ( MNHN 24759 About MNHN , Fig. 5 View FIG E-H). — LIFOU 2000, stn 1434, Loyalty Islands, Lifou Island, Huca Hutighé, Santal Bay , 20°52.5’S, 167°08.1’E, 5-20 m, diving team, 6.XI.2000, ♀ shell, H 2.7, D 4.2 mm ( MNHN 24760 About MNHN , Fig. 5 View FIG A-D) GoogleMaps .
TYPE LOCALITY. — Loyalty Islands, Lifou.
DISTRIBUTION. — Loyalty Islands, Lifou.
ETYMOLOGY. — Latin, changeable.
DESCRIPTION
Male shell ( Fig. 4 View FIG A-H)
Whorls 3.0; profile low for genus; peripheral keel at mid-whorl; profile below keel evenly rounded. Whorl expansion more than usual for genus, with strongly projecting peripheral angulation, shoulder ramp nearly flat above. Axial sculpture of strong ribs, 25-28 on last whorl; spinose and projecting in early whorls, spines projecting forward, spinosity and spacing of axial ribs much diminished in final third of last whorl. Spiral sculpture of three strong, low cords on shoulder in early whorls; changing to three narrow cords in final ⅓ whorl; base with strong subtending cord, and three cords of nearly equal strength between peripheral cord and subtending cord; base with deep pits on outer side of subtending cord and other basal cords. Umbilicus filled by emergent cord, bordered by subtending cord of nearly equal strength, both cords with lamellar extensions of axial sculpture; umbilicus partially open, partially obstructed by short, triangular tongue of inner lip in last half whorl; tongue aligned with aperture or slightly projecting forward, out of alignment with plane of aperture. Final lip massive, extending for ⅓ of final quarter whorl, showing about 20 successively decreasing layers of deposition, lip strongly showing spiral sculpture; tongue extending half the diameter of aperture on previous whorl, showing similar layers of deposition decreasing in extent. Plane of aperture coinciding with umbilical wall, plane of aperture coinciding with edge of tongue. H 3.0, D 5.1 mm (holotype).
Female shell ( Fig. 5 View FIG A-H)
Both specimens retain a portion of the tongue, but it both does not block the umbilical cavity. Two specimens ( Fig. 5 View FIG A-D, E-H) are considered to have been modified by the egg mass and the brooding of larvae to have increased the volume of the umbilical cavity. Both have the emergent cord excavated in a different manner: close to the aperture (tapered in A-D and truncate in E-H), and both have the subtending cord worn to not show the beaded intersection with the axial sculpture; the tongue is short in A-D and less shortened in E-H, but in both specimens the umbilical cavity is enlarged. H 2.7, D 4.2 mm ( Fig. 5 View FIG A-D); H 3.2, D 4.8 mm ( Fig. 5 View FIG E-H).
REMARKS
Liotipoma mutabilis n. sp. resembles L. splendida n. sp. ( Fig. 9 View FIG A-D), but has fewer axials (33 compared to 28) and a less expanding final whorl. It differs from L. dimorpha n. sp. in the thickness of the subtending cord and the basal cords, those of L. mutabilis n. sp. being thicker.
The operculum of L. mutabilis n. sp. ( Fig. 2G View FIG ) is known from a wedged-in juvenile specimen from the same station as that of the type material.The diameter of this operculum is 1.4 mm, which is larger than that of the two other known opercula ( L. wallisensis n. sp. and L. solaris n. sp.). It shows a very narrow central pit, which suggests that the pit might disappear altogether in larger specimens of this species.
This species is characterised by its greater expansion of the final whorl than usual for the genus, and its large size (D 5.9 mm), although it is smaller than L. magna n. sp. One other large species ( L. splendida n. sp.) reaches 5.1 mm in diameter.
There is a general resemblance to the species L. splendida n. sp. ( Fig. 9 View FIG A-D), but that species has a higher count of axial ribs (33 compared to 28) and has a tongue that extends forward to the plane of the aperture.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |