Liotipoma McLean & Kiel, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/z2012n2a10 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C26A814-FF80-1466-D98F-7C8869B7F717 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Liotipoma McLean & Kiel, 2007 |
status |
|
Genus Liotipoma McLean & Kiel, 2007 View in CoL
Liotipoma McLean & Kiel, 2007: 259 View in CoL .
TYPE SPECIES. — Liotipoma wallisensis McLean & Kiel, 2007 (by original designation).
DESCRIPTION
(REVISED FROM MCLEAN & KIEL, 2007)
Shell small (maximum diameter 6.8 mm), nonnacreous; aperture round; lip massively thickened and projecting, with inward extension, the tongue that partially blocks aperture in male shell; shell profile low, with projecting mid-whorl angulation and projecting subtending cord that forms lowermost projection of base. Sculpture axial and spiral; axial sculpture of raised ridges, overriding spiral sculpture; spiral sculpture of cords that terminate on outer face of final lip. Base with broad low cord in the umbilical area, the emergent cord, separated by narrow groove from prominently projecting subtending cord. Axial micro-sculpture of sharply raised lamellae throughout, strongly expressed as layers across thickened final lip. The calcified periostracum (intriticalyx) of most Liotiidae is also expressed in Liotipoma . Most specimens are sufficiently worn to not show the surface layer, but it clearly shows in the SEM view of Figure 12 View FIG E-G. Whorl diameter in some species expanding in final quarter whorl, mature lip arising abruptly, projecting, strongly thickened; lamellar deposition that forms final lip decreasing in diameter toward final position and showing terminations of spiral sculpture extending across thickened lip. Aperture nearly radial (only slightly oblique); umbilicus open in juvenile shell; umbilical wall with extension of axial sculpture, with inwardly projecting spines corresponding to axial ribs ( Fig. 12G View FIG ). Mature shell of Liotipoma species sexually dimorphic; umbilicus of male shell blocked with massive tongue, extending from inner edge of thickened lip. Female shell with open umbilical cavity, reduced tongue, bordered on outside by raised subtending cord, enlarged for brooding of larval stages.
Protoconch ( Fig. 1 View FIG ) diameter 320 µm, with fine longitudinal ridges and flared final expansion, positioned at same level as first teleoconch whorl. Axial sculpture arising in first teleoconch whorl next to protoconch in first quarter whorl, projecting at periphery (to give a spinose effect in umbilical and apical views) and clumped to project into umbilicus and clumped to form early subtending cord. Most of the figured specimens are sufficiently worn to obscure protoconch sculpture. The assumption is made that protoconchs of all species are like those shown in Figure 1 View FIG .
Operculum ( Fig. 2 View FIG ) calcareous, with deep central pit of ⅓ to ∕₄ its diameter; outer area raised, with radial, somewhat irregular rugose sculpture separated by deep radial channels; interior surface low conical, with narrow, raised multispiral volutions and long growing edge.
Radula unknown (live-collected specimens unknown).
DISTRIBUTION. — Central Indo-Pacific, sublittoral, reef-associated. Records for Liotipoma include Fiji, Wallis Island, Papua New Guinea, New Caledonia, Loyalty Islands (east of New Caledonia), and Vanuatu at Espiritu Santo. Three sympatric species are known from Lifou, Loyalty Islands ( L. mutabilis n. sp., L. dimorpha n. sp., and L. lifouensis n. sp.).
REMARKS
Liotipoma is characterised by the operculum with deep, broad central pit, conical inner surface with raised multispiral ridges; and by the shell with fine axial lamellae, the massive final lip produced by the abruptly expanded diameter of final whorl, with incremental lamellar layers decreasing in size; axial ribs are stronger than the spiral cord. The umbilicus in male shells is usually blocked by the massive extension of the inner lip, here called the tongue.
The surface sculpture of Liotipoma has axial lamellae and other sculpture comparable to that of Liotiidae . Without knowledge of the operculum, this genus would surely be placed in the Liotiidae . Most of the available specimens show some wear and encrustation.
Mature shells are large enough that illustration with SEM is not a necessity. An unusually clean, but immature (3.3 mm in diameter) specimen of L. solaris n. sp. is presented in Figure 12 View FIG E-G, showing intricate spines in the umbilical area that represent the termination of axial sculpture, as also expected in Liotiidae .
In most liotiid genera, whorl expansion stalls or retreats at the final stage,still allowing for an expanded lip. The species of Liotipoma differ in showing an increase in whorl expansion in addition to the whorl expansion resulting from the final projecting lip.
Shells of this genus are probably represented in other museum and private collections among undetermined micro-gastropods from Indo-Pacific localities,no doubt thought to be small species of Liotiidae .Live-collected specimens are unknown but the operculum is now known from single immature shells of three species, in which it is wedged in place ( Fig. 2 View FIG ).
SHELL CHARACTERS
Size
Maximum diameter ranges from 4.0 ( Liotipoma dimorpha n. sp., Fig. 6 View FIG E-H) to 6.8 mm ( L. magna n. sp., female shell, Fig. 9 View FIG ). This is usually a reliable species level character, with about a 1 mm allowance for variation in shell diameter.
Shell height
Most shells thought to represent females are noticeably higher in profile that those of male shells. These distinctions are evident from the dimensions provided in the captions for the illustrations.
Whorl count
Whorl count ranges from 2.6 to 3.3 teleoconch whorls, as determined in apical view.Smaller species generally have fewer whorls.
Count of axial ribs for final whorl
Axial ribs on the final whorl (not including the closely spaced lamellae of the body whorl and the massive final lip) number from 21 to 33. Counts can be made from spire views or from basal views. Some specimens exhibit sudden changes in the spacing of axials (e.g., L. magna n. sp., Fig. 8 View FIG A-D); others may have more closely spaced axials in the pre-terminal condition. This character is considered least reliable as a species level character, in view of the sudden changes observed in some specimens.
Peripheral spines
In most species, the peripheral spines produced by axial sculpture in basal view are directed slightly forward; in some they are pointed straight out, and in one specimen of one species ( L. lifouensis n. sp., Fig. 10 View FIG A-D), the spines are directed backward, but this does not apply to the second specimen illustrated here in which the spires are directed straight out ( Fig. 10 View FIG E-H). This is therefore unreliable for species distinctions.
Plane of aperture and plane of tongue
In basal view, it is apparent that the plane of the nearly radial aperture may or may not coincide with the plane of the outer edge of the tongue, the extension of the lip that blocks the umbilicus of the male shells. This is regarded as variable within the species.
Shape of tongue
In basal view the tongue is roughly triangular in outline. This is also regarded as variable within species. In one species ( L. lifouensis n. sp., Fig. 10 View FIG ), the tongue is longer and narrower than in others, and this is considered a species-level character.
Whorl expansion
In basal or spire views, species differ in the extent of whorl expansion in the final whorl. Some species have very little whorl expansion (e.g., L. solaris
n. sp., Fig. 11 View FIG A-D) and others have a more notable whorl expansion ( L. splendida n. sp., Fig. 13 View FIG A-D).
Relative strength and positioning of basal cords Some species have the emergent cord and subtending cord broad ( L. mutabilis n. sp., Fig. 4 View FIG ), in others the first basal is narrow ( L.dimorpha n. sp., Fig. 6 View FIG ). These distinctions are regarded as highly consistent for species determination.
SEXUAL DIMORPHISM
All species of Liotipoma are considered to be sexually dimorphic, although the available material of most species includes a recognisable female shell in only four of the eight species ( L. wallisensis , L. mutabilis n. sp., L. dimorpha n. sp., L. magna n. sp.). Female shells are unknown for the species L. lifouensis n. sp., L. solaris n. sp., L. splendida n. sp., and L. clausa n. sp.
Specimens considered as male shells have the massive tongue extending to block the umbilicus. This is not formed in female shells, which have an open umbilicus with an angular edge for the retention of egg masses and larval stages, with further protection provided by the extended body of the female.The female shell for two species better known from the male shell are shown for L. wallisensis n. sp. ( Fig. 3 View FIG E-H), and L. mutabilis n. sp. ( Fig. 4 View FIG ). In these two species the female shell seems to be worn and resorbed in the umbilical area, which is considered to have been the result of having a large egg mass and brood.
The tongue, a massive lip projection that blocks the umbilical cavity of the male shell of specimens of most species of Liotipoma gives it a predation resistant advantage over that of most species of Liotiidae , in which the open umbilical wall is thinshelled, and often is the site of drill holes made by naticid or muricid gastropods, as is evident in the drilled shells of many species.
The number of mature shells for all species of Liotipoma is limited to the material at hand, which in some species consists of very few or single specimens. Male shells are much more common than female shells and some species are known only from male shells. The few known female shells generally have a higher profile than that of male shells, which serves to expand the umbilical cavity and increase the volume available for brooding. Descriptions of the species are based on male shells, with a supplementary description of the female shells for the species in which it is now recognised.
Most species of Liotipoma have a similar general appearance, having a subdiscoidal profile with a peripheral angulation, usually two low cords on the shoulder and four cords on the base, crossed by axial ribs that form spinose projections at the periphery and extend across the shoulder and form beaded cords on intersecting the basal cords.
ARRANGEMENT OF LIOTIPOMA SPECIES
The type species in which the only known female shell is badly worn is treated first, followed by another species, in which two worn female shells are known. This is followed by two species that have the male and female shells in good condition. Species represented by male shells are treated last.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Liotipoma McLean & Kiel, 2007
Mclean, James Hamilton 2012 |
Liotipoma
McLean & Kiel 2007: 259 |