Cyphastrea, MILNE EDWARDS & HAIME, 1848
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12140 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A35B423-1861-FFEE-8604-8F78FDCEFE66 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Cyphastrea |
status |
|
GENUS CYPHASTREA MILNE EDWARDS & HAIME, 1848 View in CoL A: 494 ( FIG. 9 View Figure 9 )
Type species
Astrea microphthalma Lamarck, 1816: 261 View in CoL ; original designation, Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848a, vol. 27: 494.
Original description
‘Diffère des trois genres précédents [ Astrea , Plesiastrea , Solenastrea ] par la compacité du coenenchyme et par
la structure poutrellaire de la partie interne des cloisons.’ ( Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848a, vol. 27: 494).
Subsequent descriptions
Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849b, vol. 12: 114; Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857, vol. 2: 484–485; Tenison-Woods, 1878: 322; Klunzinger, 1879: 50–51; Duncan, 1884: 107; Quelch, 1886: 106; Saville Kent, 1893: 27; Gardiner, 1899: 761; Delage & Hérouard, 1901: 630; Gardiner, 1904: 778; Matthai, 1914: 38–39; Vaughan, 1918: 87; Hoffmeister, 1925: 19; Faustino, 1927: 114–115; Yabe et al., 1936: 23; Vaughan & Wells, 1943: 174; Alloiteau, 1952: 625; Crossland, 1952: 117; Wells, 1956: F406; Nemenzo, 1959: 112; Chevalier, 1975: 9; Veron et al., 1977: 167; Wijsman-Best, 1980: 239; Scheer & Pillai, 1983: 133; Wood, 1983: 167, 170; Veron, 1986: 520; Chevalier & Beauvais, 1987: 716; Sheppard, 1990: 12; Sheppard & Sheppard, 1991: 139; Veron, 2000, vol. 3: 240.
Diagnosis (apomorphies in italics)
Colonial, with extracalicular budding only. Corallites monomorphic and discrete (one to three centres); monticules absent. Coenosteum generally spinose (costate in Cyphastrea agassizi and apical corallites of Cyphastrea decadia ), moderate amount (<corallite diameter; extensive in Cyphastrea decadia ). Calice width small (<4 mm), with low relief (<3 mm). Costosepta not confluent. Septa in ≤ three cycles (≤ 36 septa). Free septa regular. Septa spaced> 11 septa per 5 mm. Costosepta unequal in relative thickness. Columellae trabecular but compact (one to three threads), <1/4 of calice width, and discontinuous amongst adjacent corallites. Paliform (uniaxial) lobes weak or moderate. Epitheca well developed and endotheca lowmoderate (tabular) ( Fig. 9A, D, G View Figure 9 ).
Tooth base at midcalice circular. Tooth tip at midcalice irregular; tip orientation multiaxial. Tooth height low (<0.3 mm) and tooth spacing narrow (<0.3 mm), with> six teeth per septum. Granules scattered on septal face; strong (pointed). Interarea smooth ( Fig. 9B, E, H View Figure 9 ).
Walls formed by dominant septotheca; abortive septa absent. Thickening deposits fibrous. Costa centre clusters weak; 0.3–0.6 mm between clusters; medial lines weak. Septum centre clusters weak; <0.3 mm between clusters; medial lines weak. Transverse crosses absent. Columella centres clustered ( Fig. 9C, F, I View Figure 9 ).
Species included
1. Cyphastrea microphthalma ( Lamarck, 1816: 261) ; holotype: MNHN IK-2012–14002 (dry specimen; Fig. 9A View Figure 9 ); type locality: ‘les mers de la Nouvelle- Hollande’ ( Lamarck, 1816: 261); phylogenetic data: molecular and morphology.
2. Cyphastrea agassizi ( Vaughan, 1907: 101, pl. 25: figs 2, 2a, 3, 3a); syntypes: USNM 21633 About USNM , 21634 About USNM (two dry specimens); type locality: O’ahu, Hawai’i; phylogenetic data: partial morphology .
3. Cyphastrea chalcidicum ( Forskål, 1775: 136) ; holotype: lost ( Matthai, 1914: 42); neotype: NHMUK 1978.1.1.4 ( Wijsman-Best, 1980: 242), designated by Veron et al. (1977: 173), status unknown; type locality: southwest Swain Reefs, Australia, 5–14 m in depth; phylogenetic data: molecular and morphology.
4. Cyphastrea decadia Moll & Best, 1984: 56 , figs 5, 6; holotype: RMNH 15271 About RMNH (dry specimen); paratypes: RMNH 15272 About RMNH , 15273 About RMNH (two dry specimens); type locality: 111 m offshore of north Pajenekang , Spermonde Archipelago, Indonesia, 8 m depth; phylogenetic data: partial morphology .
5. Cyphastrea hexasepta Veron, Turak & DeVantier, 2000 ( Veron, 2000, vol. 3: 245, fig. 5; see also Veron, 2002: 171, figs 312–314; ICZN, 2011: 163); lectotype (designated herein): MTQ G55834 (dry specimen); type locality: northern Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia, 10 m depth; phylogenetic data: none.
6. Cyphastrea japonica Yabe & Sugiyama, 1932: 161 (see also Yabe et al., 1936: 25, pl. 17: figs 4–6); holotype: TIU 40323 (dry specimen); type locality: Misaki, Shikoku, Japan; phylogenetic data: molecular only ( Chen et al., 2004).
7. Cyphastrea ocellina ( Dana, 1846: 218, plate 10: fig. 10); syntypes: YPM IZ 474, 4330 (two dry specimens); type locality: Hawai’i; phylogenetic data: molecular only ( Romano & Palumbi, 1996).
8. Cyphastrea serailia ( Forskål, 1775: 135) ; syntypes: ZMUC ANT-000367 ( Fig. 9G View Figure 9 ) to ANT-000373, figured in Matthai (1914, pl. 11: figs 4–9; seven dry specimens); type locality: Red Sea; phylogenetic data: molecular and morphology.
Taxonomic remarks
Cyphastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848a View in CoL , vol. 27: 494, was established to accommodate species distinguished by their compact coenosteum – ‘compacité du coenenchyme’ ( Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848a, vol. 27: 494). Following which, only one species – Cyphastrea agassizi View in CoL – has ever been placed in another genus, implying limited confusion with its taxonomy.
Molecular data indicate that Cyphastrea View in CoL is very dissimilar from other taxa as it is subtended by a long branch from its sister genus, Orbicella View in CoL . Yet, the Cyphastrea View in CoL + Orbicella View in CoL clade (subclade C) is a wellsupported relationship that has been recovered in several studies ( Fukami et al., 2004 a, 2008; Huang et al., 2011; Arrigoni et al., 2012).
Cyphastrea is widely distributed on reefs of the Indo- Pacific, present in French Polynesia and the Pitcairn Islands in the Southern Hemisphere ( Glynn et al., 2007), but absent in the eastern Pacific in the north.
Morphological remarks
Cyphastrea is a morphologically well-defined and moderately supported genus (bootstrap support of 69 and decay index of 2), but it is also exclusively associated with Echinopora , Orbicella , and Paramontastraea . Cyphastrea spp. share the plesiomorphic state of spinose coenosteum with Echinopora and Paramontastraea , amongst other characters with Orbicella , supporting them as a clade that is sister to the rest of Merulinidae .
Despite the recent emphasis that corals east and west of the Americas are genetically distinct from one another ( Fukami et al., 2004a), and whilst Cyphastrea and Orbicella are found solely in the Indo-Pacific and Atlantic realms, respectively, synapomorphies are present for the clade comprising them, namely small calice width (likelihood of 0.69 based on the Mk1 model) and trabecular but compact columellae (likelihood 0.86). They also have walls formed predominantly by septotheca, a plesiomorphic state shared only with Paramontastraea .
On its own, Cyphastrea is defined by the synapomorphy of strong pointed granules on the septal face (likelihood 0.99). Because its closest relative does not overlap geographically, it is easily identified with the apomorphies shared with Orbicella . The multiaxial tooth tips, although also present amongst Echinopora and Paramontastraea , are much more conspicuous in Cyphastrea because of their small corallites.
To date, phylogenetic data are only available for about half of the members of Cyphastrea (see also Romano & Palumbi, 1996; Chen et al., 2004).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cyphastrea
Huang, Danwei, Benzoni, Francesca, Fukami, Hironobu, Knowlton, Nancy, Smith, Nathan D. & Budd, Ann F. 2014 |
Astrea microphthalma
Lamarck JBP 1816: 261 |