Hydnophora, FISCHER VON WALDHEIM, 1807: 295
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12140 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A35B423-1851-FFDD-8607-8B10FBF1FC71 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Hydnophora |
status |
|
GENUS HYDNOPHORA FISCHER VON WALDHEIM, 1807: 295 View in CoL ( FIG. 15 View Figure 15 )
Synonyms
Hydnophorella Delage & Hérouard, 1901: 628 View in CoL , fig. 876 (type species: Hydnophora contignatio Klunzinger, 1879: 23 View in CoL , pl. 3: figs 2, 3, pl. 9: fig. 12a, b, c = Madrepora exesa Pallas, 1766: 290 ; original designation, Delage & Hérouard, 1901: 628); Monticularia Lamarck, 1816: 248 View in CoL (type species: Monticularia folium Lamarck, 1816: 250 View in CoL = Madrepora exesa Pallas, 1766: 290 ; original designation, Lamarck, 1816: 250); Monticulina Saville Kent, 1893: 169 View in CoL (type species Hydnophora rigida Saville Kent, 1893: 168 View in CoL , chromo pl. 7: fig. 7; original designation, Saville Kent, 1893: 169).
Type species
Hydnophora demidovii Fischer von Waldheim, 1807: 295 View in CoL , pl. 4 = Madrepora exesa Pallas, 1766: 290 (see Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857, vol. 2: 420; Vaughan, 1918: 121; Matthai, 1928: 140; Chevalier, 1975: 175); original designation, Fischer von Waldheim, 1807: 295.
Original description
‘Polypier pierreux, crustacé, en masse glomérulée ou en expansions lobées, subfoliacées, ayant sa surface supérieure parsemée d’étoiles lamelleuses, à centre solide, pyramidal, et plus ou moins élevé.’ ( Fischer von Waldheim, 1807: 295).
Subsequent descriptions
Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848a, vol. 27: 493; Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849a, vol. 11: 299, 300; d’Orbigny, 1851: 168; Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857, vol. 2: 418, 419; Klunzinger, 1879: 20; Quenstedt, 1881: 1013; Duncan, 1884: 97; Quelch, 1886: 95; Saville Kent, 1893: 168, 169; Gardiner, 1899: 744; Delage & Hérouard, 1901: 702; Gardiner, 1904: 764; Vaughan, 1918: 121; Hoffmeister, 1925: 29, 30; Faustino, 1927: 148, 149; Matthai, 1928: 136, 137; Coryell & Ohlsen, 1929: 202, 203; Yabe et al., 1936: 39; Vaughan & Wells, 1943: 169, 170; Alloiteau, 1952: 618; Wells, 1956: F402, F403; Nemenzo, 1959: 102; Wijsman-Best, 1972: 51; Chevalier, 1975: 167; Veron et al., 1977: 124; Scheer & Pillai, 1983: 127; Wood, 1983: 158; Veron, 1986: 428; Chevalier & Beauvais, 1987: 717; Veron & Hodgson, 1989: 268; Sheppard, 1990: 12; Best & Suharsono, 1991: 334; Sheppard & Sheppard, 1991: 117; Bosellini, 1999: 222; Veron, 2000, vol. 2: 364.
Diagnosis (apomorphies in italics)
Colonial, with intracalicular budding only. Corallites monomorphic and uniserial; monticules present. Walls fused. Calice width small to medium (≤ 15 mm), with low to medium relief (≤ 6 mm). Costosepta not confluent. Septa in <three cycles (<24 septa). Free septa absent. Septa spaced six to 11 septa per 5 mm. Costosepta equal in relative thickness. Columellae trabecular but compact (one to three threads), <1/4 of calice width, and continuous amongst adjacent corallites. Paliform (uniaxial) lobes absent. Epitheca reduced and endotheca sparse ( Fig. 15A, D, G View Figure 15 ).
Tooth base at midcalice circular. Tooth tip at midcalice irregular; tip orientation perpendicular to septum. Tooth height low (<0.3 mm) and tooth spacing narrow (<0.3 mm), with> six teeth per septum. Granules aligned on septal face, perpendicular to septal margin; irregular in shape. Interarea palisade ( Fig. 15B, E, H View Figure 15 ).
Walls formed by dominant trabeculotheca and partial septotheca; abortive septa absent. Thickening deposits fibrous. Costa centre clusters weak; <0.3 mm between clusters; medial lines strong. Septum centre clusters weak; <0.3 mm between clusters; medial lines strong. Transverse crosses absent. Columella centres aligned ( Fig. 15C, F, I View Figure 15 ).
Species included
1. Hydnophora exesa ( Pallas, 1766: 290) ; holotype: lost ( Chevalier, 1975: 176); neotype (designated herein): UP P1 L02157 View Materials (dry specimen; Fig. 15A View Figure 15 ); type locality: Talim Bay, Batangas, the Philippines, 2.5 m depth (‘Oceanus Indicus’; Pallas, 1766: 291); phylogenetic data: molecular and morphology.
2. Hydnophora bonsai Veron, 1990: 139 , figs 46, 47; holotype: MTQ G32486 (dry specimen); type locality: Kushimoto , Japan, 4 m depth; phylogenetic data: none .
3. Hydnophora grandis Gardiner, 1904: 764 , pl. 60: fig. 11; syntypes: NHMUK 1928.4.18.227 ( Fig. 15D View Figure 15 ), 1928.5.2.1 (two dry specimens); type locality: south Nilandu and Haddumati, Maldives (see also Matthai, 1928: 153); phylogenetic data: molecular ( Fukami et al., 2008) and morphology.
4. Hydnophora microconos ( Lamarck, 1816: 251) ; holotype: MNHN IK-2010-477 (dry specimen); type locality: ‘lOcéan des Grandes-Indes’ ( Lamarck, 1836: 393); phylogenetic data: molecular and morphology.
5. Hydnophora pilosa Veron, 1985: 176 , figs 26–28; holotype: WAM 174-84 (also WAM Z919; Griffith & Fromont, 1998: 235) (dry specimen); paratypes: WAM 175-84, 176-84 (also WAM Z920, Z921; Griffith & Fromont, 1998: 235) (two dry specimens); type locality: Elizabeth Reef, eastern Australia, 6 m depth; phylogenetic data: molecular and partial morphology.
6. Hydnophora rigida ( Dana, 1846: 276, pl. 17: figs 1, 1a–c); syntype: USNM 148 About USNM (dry specimen; Fig. 15G, I View Figure 15 ); type locality: Fiji; phylogenetic data: morphology only .
Taxonomic remarks
Hydnophora Fischer von Waldheim, 1807: 295 View in CoL , is a distinct genus whose monophyly (subclade H) has been well supported by molecular data ( Huang et al., 2011; Huang, 2012). Prior to Veron’s (1986: 428, 2000, vol. 2: 364) placement of Hydnophora View in CoL within Merulinidae View in CoL , it was more often associated with Faviidae sensu Wells, 1956 View in CoL : F402 (see Vaughan & Wells, 1943: 169; Chevalier, 1975: 167; Veron et al., 1977: 124). Molecular phylogenies show that it is most closely related to Favites View in CoL , Leptoria View in CoL , and Platygyra ( Huang et al., 2011) View in CoL , or Astrea curta View in CoL and Favites russelli ( Arrigoni et al., 2012) View in CoL , and relatively distinct from Merulina View in CoL and Scapophyllia View in CoL , the other Merulinidae View in CoL taxa before the revision of Budd et al. (2012).
The genus is relatively well sampled. Only Hydnophora bonsai View in CoL , a Japanese endemic ( Veron, 1990: 141), has not been investigated in a phylogenetic context.
Hydnophora is widely distributed on reefs of the Indo- Pacific, present as far east as the Austral Islands in the Southern Hemisphere ( Glynn et al., 2007), but absent eastwards from Hawai’i in the north.
Morphological remarks
On the morphology tree, Hydnophora is supported by a high bootstrap value (95) and decay index (4), and is sister to the clade formed by Australogyra , Leptoria , and Platygyra . It is distinguished as the only scleractinian taxon to possess monticules. Other synapomorphies include the reduced epitheca (likelihood of 1.0 based on the Mk1 model), sparse endotheca (likelihood 1.0), and lack of free septa (likelihood 1.0), all of which make the genus easily separable from its close relatives. Note, however, that the type material of Hydnophora grandis has relatively vesicular endotheca, although other specimens examined possess the generic state.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Hydnophora
Huang, Danwei, Benzoni, Francesca, Fukami, Hironobu, Knowlton, Nancy, Smith, Nathan D. & Budd, Ann F. 2014 |
Hydnophorella Delage & Hérouard, 1901: 628
Delage Y & Herouard E 1901: 628 |
Delage Y & Herouard E 1901: 628 |
Saville Kent W 1893: 169 |
Saville Kent W 1893: 168 |
Saville Kent W 1893: 169 |
Klunzinger CB 1879: 23 |
Lamarck JBP 1816: 248 |
Lamarck JBP 1816: 250 |
Lamarck JBP 1816: 250 |
Pallas PS 1766: 290 |
Pallas PS 1766: 290 |
HYDNOPHORA FISCHER VON WALDHEIM, 1807: 295
Fischer von Waldheim G 1807: 295 |
Hydnophora demidovii
Chevalier JP 1975: 175 |
Matthai G 1928: 140 |
Vaughan TW 1918: 121 |
Fischer von Waldheim G 1807: 295 |
Fischer von Waldheim G 1807: 295 |
Pallas PS 1766: 290 |
Hydnophora
Veron JEN 1986: 428 |
Veron JEN & Pichon M & Wijsman-Best M 1977: 124 |
Chevalier JP 1975: 167 |
Vaughan TW & Wells JW 1943: 169 |
Fischer von Waldheim G 1807: 295 |