Montastraea, DE BLAINVILLE, 1830: 339
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/zoj.12140 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A35B423-183B-FFB3-86D2-89F0FA7BFE95 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Montastraea |
status |
|
GENUS MONTASTRAEA DE BLAINVILLE, 1830: 339 View in CoL ( FIG. 27 View Figure 27 )
Synonym
Montastrea Vaughan & Wells, 1943: 173 (misspelling).
Type species
Astrea guettardi Defrance, 1826: 379 , fossil (figured in Guettard, 1770, vol. 3, pl. 48: figs 2–4); subsequent designation, Lang & Smith, 1935: 554; holotype: lost; hypotype: MNHN R05933, figured in Michelin, 1842, pl. 12: fig. 3 (dry specimen; Fig. 27A View Figure 27 ); type locality: Miocene.
Original description
‘En masses épaisses, composées de cellules tubuleuses assez serrées pour être polygonales, à bords non saillans, à cavité assez profonde, garnie de lamelles nombreuses, remontant le long d’une axe solide plus ou moins saillant.’ ( de Blainville, 1830: 339).
Subsequent descriptions
de Blainville, 1834: 374; Lang & Smith, 1935: 554; Wells, 1936: 120; Vaughan & Wells, 1943: 173; Smith, 1948: 90; Wells, 1954: 463; Wells, 1956: F404; Chevalier, 1971: 278; Veron et al., 1977: 136; Wijsman-Best, 1977: 84; Scheer & Pillai, 1983: 139; Wood, 1983: 49; Veron, 1986: 502; Chevalier & Beauvais, 1987: 714; Veron & Hodgson, 1989: 273; Sheppard, 1990: 24; Budd, 1991: 34 ; Sheppard & Sheppard, 1991: 135; Veron, 2000, vol. 3: 212.
Diagnosis
Colonial, with extracalicular budding only. Corallites monomorphic and discrete (one to three centres); monticules absent. Coenosteum costate, moderate amount (<corallite diameter). Calice width medium (4– 15 mm), with medium relief (3–6 mm). Costosepta not confluent. Septa in ≥ four cycles (≥ 48 septa; including very short free septa). Free septa regular. Septa spaced> 11 septa per 5 mm. Costosepta unequal in relative thickness. Columellae trabecular and spongy (> three threads), ≥ 1/4 of calice width. Paliform (uniaxial) lobes absent. Epitheca well developed and endotheca low−moderate (tabular) ( Fig. 27A, D View Figure 27 ).
Tooth base at midcalice elliptical−perpendicular. Tooth tip at midcalice regular (pointed). Tooth height medium (0.3–0.6 mm) and tooth spacing medium (0.3–1 mm), with> six teeth per septum. Granules scattered on septal face; weak (rounded). Interarea smooth ( Fig. 27B, E View Figure 27 ).
Walls formed by partial septotheca; abortive septa weak. Thickening deposits fibrous. Costa centre clusters strong; 0.3–0.6 mm between clusters; medial lines absent. Septum centre clusters weak; 0.3–0.5 mm between clusters; medial lines absent. Transverse crosses absent. Columella centres clustered ( Fig. 27C, F View Figure 27 ).
Species included
Montastraea cavernosa ( Linnaeus, 1767: 1276) View in CoL ; holotype: unknown, figured in Seba (1758, pl. 112: fig. 19) (reproduced in Budd, 1991: 37 , fig. 20); type locality: ‘O. Americano’ ( Linnaeus, 1767: 1277); phylogenetic data: molecular and morphology.
Taxonomic remarks
Montastraea de Blainville, 1830: 339 View in CoL , was initially described as a subgenus of Astrea View in CoL consisting solely of five fossil species. This name never caught on, partly because of its subgenus status, but also because of its association with the more commonly used name Heliastraea View in CoL Milne Edwards & Haime, 1857, vol. 2: 456. Forty-five species of both modern and fossil corals were attributed to Heliastraea View in CoL , including the type Madrepora astroites Forskål, 1775: 133 View in CoL (= Astrea forskaliana View in CoL Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849b, vol. 12: 100), as well as Madrepora cavernosa Esper, 1795: 18 , pl. 37: figs 1, 2 (= Madrepora cavernosa Linnaeus, 1767: 1276 ).
Astrea guettardi Defrance, 1826: 379 , is one of the species originally assigned to Montastraea View in CoL , but it was only chosen as ‘genolectotype’ more than a century later by Lang & Smith (1935) and Wells (1936). The authors elevated this taxon to genus, and continued its restriction to fossil corals albeit spanning Cenozoic to Palaeozoic. Shortly after, Vaughan & Wells (1943: 173) redefined the genus and included as synonyms Heliastraea View in CoL and Orbicella View in CoL amongst several fossil genera, effectively incorporating the Recent Atlantic ( Madrepora cavernosa and Orbicella View in CoL ) and Red Sea ( Astrea forskaliana View in CoL ) within its range, although the latter was not explicitly stated. Note that an ‘a’ was omitted from the genus name in the process, a practice that has propagated until today ( Veron, 2000, vol. 3: 212; but see Chevalier, 1971: 278; Budd et al., 2012). Wells (1956: F404) followed a similar treatment, but excluded Heliastraea View in CoL as a synonym, thus restricting the living Montastraea View in CoL to the Atlantic.
Subsequent workers expanded on the definition of this genus, characterizing it mainly with the trait of extracalicular budding, and consequently incorporat- ed Indo-Pacific species such as Astrea curta Dana, 1846: 209 View in CoL , Astrea annuligera View in CoL Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849b, vol. 12: 103, Phymastrea valenciennesi View in CoL Milne Edwards & Haime, 1849b, vol. 12: 124, and Montastraea magnistellata Chevalier, 1971: 293 ( Chevalier, 1971; Veron et al., 1977; Wijsman-Best, 1977; Veron, 1986, 2000). It is also clear that Heliastraea View in CoL is a synonym of Echinopora View in CoL instead of Montastraea View in CoL because its type Astrea forskaliana View in CoL (holotype: MNHN IK-2010-406) undoubtedly belongs in Echinopora View in CoL ( Wijsman-Best, 1980; Veron, 2000), even against the broader definition of Montastraea View in CoL .
This genus is a challenge to define, and it has been argued that confusion with Plesiastrea Milne Edwards & Haime, 1848a, vol. 27: 494, is causing this taxonomic uncertainty ( Veron et al., 1977). Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have shown that the problem is far worse than previously thought. Fukami et al. (2008) and Kitahara et al. (2010) initially showed that Montastrea (sensu Veron, 2000) is polyphyletic and present in at least three separate clades, but more extensive samplings of the group placed it in up to six distinct lineages ( Huang et al., 2011; Arrigoni et al., 2012). All species examined to date, with the exception of Madrepora cavernosa Linnaeus, 1767: 1276 (clade XVI), and Montastrea multipunctata Hodgson, 1985: 284 (clade XVIII, XIX or XX; Lobophylliidae ), are nested within Merulinidae and have been dealt with above.
Montastraeidae View in CoL is restricted to Montastraea cavernosa View in CoL on the basis of molecular data that place it in one of the deepest branching lineages of clades XV to XXI ( Budd et al., 2012), either sister to Merulinidae View in CoL + Lobophylliidae View in CoL + Mussidae ( Fukami et al., 2008) View in CoL , or to Diploastraeidae View in CoL ( Huang et al., 2011; Arrigoni et al., 2012).
‘ Montastrea’ multipunctata has been placed outside of the Merulinidae View in CoL clade based on molecular and morphological data (Fig. 2; Huang et al., 2011; Arrigoni et al., 2014). It is in close alliance with Lobophylliidae View in CoL species, although the precise relationship is unknown. There is however little evidence to suggest that it has any affinity to Montastraea cavernosa View in CoL . Here, we place it in the family Lobophylliidae Dai & Horng, 2009: 59 View in CoL that awaits detailed taxonomic revision.
Montastraea is distributed on reefs of the Atlantic, specifically in the Caribbean, Brazil, and West Africa.
Morphological remarks
Montastraea is an outgroup for the morphological phylogeny and thus no apomorphies were inferred. It can be distinguished from Orbicella , which co-occur in the Caribbean, in having larger (4–15 mm) and deeper (3– 6 mm) calices, more septa (≥ 48), spongy columellae, larger and more widely spaced septal teeth (0.3– 0.6 mm high, 0.3–1 mm apart) with ellipticalperpendicular bases and regular (pointed) tips, weak (rounded) granules, presence of weak abortive septa, strong costa centre clusters, and absence of medial lines.
FAMILY DIPLOASTRAEIDAE CHEVALIER & BEAUVAIS, 1987: 721 View in CoL
Synonym
Diploastreidae Budd et al., 2012: 469 (misspelling).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Montastraea
Huang, Danwei, Benzoni, Francesca, Fukami, Hironobu, Knowlton, Nancy, Smith, Nathan D. & Budd, Ann F. 2014 |
Diploastreidae
Budd AF & Fukami H & Smith ND & Knowlton N 2012: 469 |
DIPLOASTRAEIDAE CHEVALIER & BEAUVAIS, 1987: 721
Chevalier JP & Beauvais L 1987: 721 |
Montastrea
Vaughan TW & Wells JW 1943: 173 |
MONTASTRAEA
de Blainville HMD 1830: 339 |
Montastraea
de Blainville HMD 1830: 339 |
Esper EJC 1795: 18 |
Forskal P 1775: 133 |
Linnaeus C 1767: 1276 |
Astrea guettardi
Lang WD & Smith S 1935: 554 |
Defrance M 1826: 379 |
Astrea guettardi
Chevalier JP 1971: 278 |
Vaughan TW & Wells JW 1943: 173 |
Defrance M 1826: 379 |
Montastraea cavernosa ( Linnaeus, 1767: 1276 )
Budd AF 1991: 37 |
Linnaeus C 1767: 1276 |
Linnaeus C 1767: 1277 |