Ceranisus lepidotus Graham, 1963, 1991
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7909932 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A2587D3-FF8C-1D15-FE4C-119AFE0E27D8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ceranisus lepidotus Graham, 1963 |
status |
|
Ceranisus lepidotus Graham, 1963 View in CoL
Figs 49–52 View Figs 49–52
Ceranisus lepidotus Graham, 1963: 271 View in CoL , 272. (Type locality: Britain, unlocalized [sic] (Graham 1963)) Ceranisus lepidotus Graham View in CoL : Boucek & Askew, 1968: 137; Loomans & van Lenteren 1995: 130, 196; Lacasa, Sánchez & Lorca 1996: 341–345, 347, 348.
Diagnosis: As noted by Graham (1963), this species somewhat resembles C. pacuvius (especially chaetotaxy of the forewing) but yet its both sexes can be easily distinguished from those of C. pacuvius by the obvious metallic green colouration of the dorsum of head and mesosoma, which are also much strongly sculptured in C. lepidotus . Also in
C. lepidotus , F1 is about as long as wide in both sexes and male scape is relatively slender, whereas in C. pacuvius F1 is clearly longer than wide and male scape is strongly swollen. The forewing of C. lepidotus is relatively wider and its marginal setae are relatively shorter than those of C. pacuvius .
Redescription: Female (n=1, paratype). Body and appendages dark brown except head and mesosoma dark metallic green dorsally, basal metasomal terga just a little, but not contrastingly, lighter (brown); head, mesosoma, coxae, and femora with variable reticulate sculpturing.
Vertexal suture slightly sinuate. Antenna ( Fig. 49 View Figs 49–52 ) with scape slightly broadened medially and notably narrowed distally, about 4.8 x as long as wide; pedicel longer than funicle; both anelli conspicuous; funicle segments subequal, about as long as wide (F2 more quadrate than F1), each with 1 sensillum; clava about 2.1 x as long as wide, its distal segment 1.7–2.0 x as long as basal claval segment.
Mesosoma about as long as metasoma; midlobe of mesoscutum with 2 pairs of setae. Forewing ( Fig. 50 View Figs 49–52 ) about 2.5 x as long as wide; longest marginal setae about 1/5 maximal width of forewing; disc hyaline, uniformly covered with numerous setae; submarginal vein with 2 hypochaetae opposite to proximal dorsal macrochaeta, postmarginal vein a little shorter than stigmal vein. Hind wing 6.3 x as long as wide; longest marginal setae about 4/5 its maximal width; disc hyaline, uniformly covered with numerous setae.
Petiole about 1.8 x wider than long. Ovipositor short, occupying about 3/5 length of gaster, not exserted; ovipositor length/metatibia length ratio 2.0:1.
Measurements (n=1, paratype). Body: about 1000.Antenna: scape: 138; pedicel: 75; F1: 27; F2: 27; clava: 91. Forewing: 812/326; longest marginal seta: 64. Hind wing: 720/115; longest marginal seta: 94. Ovipositor: 249.
Male (description, hitherto unknown). Similar to female except for normal sexually dimorphic features and the following. Antenna ( Fig. 51 View Figs 49–52 ) with scape short (about 3.6 x as long as wide), just a little dilated medially, notably longitudinally striate; F1 slightly narrower than F2 and with 1 sensillum, F2 with 2 sensilla; clava 3-segmented as normal for the genus, about 2.0 x as long as wide. Submarginal vein of forewing with 3 hypochaetae opposite to proximal dorsal macrochaeta. Genitalia as in Fig. 52 View Figs 49–52 .
Type material examined: Paratype female on point [ BMNH], labelled: 1. “Wytham Wood, BERKS, (1) 21.6.1952, M. W. Graham. ”; 2. “near clavicornis sec. Type in coll. Thomson ”; 3. “ PARATYPE ”; 4. “ Ceranisus lepidotus sp. n. M. de V. Graham det. 1963 Paratype^”. This badly shriveled specimen was then remounted onto a slide in Canada balsam at UCRC, and that enabled its detailed study and also made possible drawing the illustrations .
Other material examined: SPAIN: Valencia, 5.vi.1991, 1ơ (“ex. Diplotaxis erucoides Univ. Politer , Valencia, coll. 327-16, IIE 2181. Ceranisus lepidotus Graham Det. J. LaSalle, 1991 ”) [BMNH].
Distribution: Great Britain (an unspecified location) (Graham 1963) as well as England ( UK) and Spain.
Hosts: Found in association with various thrips species ( Lacasa, Sánchez & Lorca 1996) but not reared from any of them, although C. lepidotus was observed parasitising larvae of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) and Limothrips cerealium (Haliday) ( Lacasa, Contreras et al. 1996) .
Comments: The holotype of this species (not examined) is in the Haliday Collection, National Museum of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland (Graham 1963); it is unfortunate that it was chosen by the author as a primary type because it has a very vague, insufficient label data (it would have made much more sense if the current paratype specimen were used in such capacity) .
Lacasa, Sánchez & Lorca (1996) reported C. lepidotus from Spain but were obviously confused about pertinence of their specimens to a particular sex: they claimed that only females of this species were found; however, they keyed (and also illustrated) apparently a male, which has a 3-segmented clava, whereas that of female is 2-segmented, as normal for Ceranisus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ceranisus lepidotus Graham, 1963
Triapitsyn, Serguei V. 2005 |
Ceranisus lepidotus Graham, 1963: 271
Graham Det. J. LaSalle 1991: 271 |
Ceranisus lepidotus Graham
Graham Det. J. LaSalle 1991 |