Toxoderella Giglio-Tos, 1914
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5239.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:225B8F73-6315-4302-98E5-D97DC0480C3A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7635254 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/69737B64-FFFB-FFC3-FF47-7C20FD13F917 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Toxoderella Giglio-Tos, 1914 |
status |
|
Toxoderella Giglio-Tos, 1914 View in CoL
Toxoderella fortnumi ( Westwood, 1889) View in CoL
I have examined the type of this enigmatic species and although it is undoubtedly a member of the Toxoderinae , the type locality is almost certainly incorrect. The collection locality is tentatively given as northern Australia by both Westwood (1889) and Giglio-Tos (1914), but no other member of the Toxoderinae is known from anywhere outside of Afro-Eurasia ( Schwarz & Roy 2019). The type specimen was collected by C. D. E. Fortnum, who also collected the type specimens of Amorphoscelis pellucida (see comments under that species). One of these specimens has been mislabelled as having come from Adelaide when in fact it was from Sri Lanka ( Roy 2009), and it seems highly likely that the type of T. fortnumi is similarly mislabelled. Indeed, the purported closest relatives of the species ( Toxodanuria Uvarov, 1940 ; Euthyphleps Wood-Mason, 1889 ; and Toxoderopsis Wood-Mason, 1889 ) all occur in South Asia ( Schwarz & Roy 2019), and it is almost certain that this is where the specimen originated. For this reason, it is removed from the Australian list.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Toxoderinae |
Tribe |
Toxoderopsini |