Aspilia rupestris Rondani, 1866
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4981220 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/686387A0-FF41-FF27-5889-FF1BFA9563FC |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Aspilia rupestris Rondani, 1866 |
| status |
|
Aspilia rupestris Rondani, 1866 View in CoL
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1866a: 87 (key), 89 (description).
TYPE LOCALITY: “ in Apennino parmensi … in alpina plaga agri Tirolensis [Parmese Apennines ( Italy) … Tyrolean alpine locality]” .
TYPE MATERIAL: not found in this study. See Remarks.
CURRENT STATUS: junior synonym of Thricops nigrifrons ( Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) View in CoL ( Pont 1986b: 68, Gorodkov et al. 1995: 10).
REMARKS: Rondani (1866a: 89) described Aspilia rupestris from two females: “ Foeminam unicam legi … in Apennino parmensi, et aliam possideo … lectam a Prof. Strobel [I collected one female … in Parmese Apennines and have another one collected by Prof. Strobel]”. Rondani (1877c: 90) considered the female received from Strobel as a different species, which he named Spilogaster tirolensis . Hennig (1961: 228) incorrectly considered the specimen from “ Tirol ” [= Tyrol] as the type of Atherigona rupestris . We did not find the specimen from “Parma”, the true type of Aspilia rupestris but, under the name Atherigona rupestris in the MZUF, did find the single specimen from “ Tirol ” [= Tyrol], which we consider as the holotype of Spilogaster tirolensis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.