Tabanus dives Rondani, 1875
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4981964 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/686387A0-FED1-FEB7-5889-FEABFE4B6294 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tabanus dives Rondani, 1875 |
status |
|
Tabanus dives Rondani, 1875 View in CoL
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1875c: 457.
TYPE LOCALITY: “ Insula Bonae Fortunae (Borneo) , Provincia Sarawak [ Bona Fortuna Island, Sarawak Province, Borneo]” ( Rondani 1875c: 421).
TYPE MATERIAL: 1 ♀, lectotype ( MSNG): Sarawak / Typus / dives Rond. / Tabanus dives , n° 68.
PARALECTOTYPE NOT EXAMINED: 2 ♀♀ ( MZUF: Box 71): Tabanus dives n. / Sarawak / [no identification number]; 1 ♀ (abdomen partially eaten by dermestids) ( MZUF: Box 71): Tabanus dives n. / Borneo, Sarawak, 1865–66, Coll. Doria / [no identification number]; 1 ♀ ( MSNG): Borneo, Sarawak, 1865/1866, Coll. Doria / Tabanus dives n.; 1 ♀ ( MSNG): Borneo, Sarawak, 1865/1866, Coll. Doria / Tabanus dives Rond. , vid. Rondani.
CURRENT STATUS: junior primary homonym of Tabanus dives Walker, 1848 and junior synonym of Tabanus immanis Wiedemann, 1828 ( Stone 1975: 61) .
REMARKS: Rondani (1875c: 457) described Tabanus dives from just the female sex, without specifying the exact number of specimens and not giving a range of lengths, from material collected by G. Doria and O. Beccari. Ricardo (1911: 186; 207) reported that the type series consists of two females in the MSNG (instead of three), but did not mention another three females in the MZUF, which bring the original type series to six specimens. Guiglia (1957: 197) reported a “ holotype ” in the MSNG. In his original description Rondani did not explicitly refer to a single specimen, therefore Guiglia’s “ holotype ” specimen must be considered as the lectotype (I.C.Z.N. 1999: Article 74.6). Raineri & Rey (1996: 54) reported just one specimen in the MSNG. The additional specimens not examined by Ricardo or Guiglia (two females in the MSNG and the three females in the MZUF) are paralectotypes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.