Spaethiella rugosa ( Boheman, 1850 )

Sekerka, Lukáš, 2016, Taxonomic and nomenclatural changes in Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 56 (1), pp. 275-344 : 307

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5305725
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E24F1028-C6AC-4323-9ED5-C9B7FF3434ACD
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6450012
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/677FCF20-FFFA-FFD1-FE49-FB8BFDC3F9F5
treatment provided by	Marcus
scientific name	Spaethiella rugosa ( Boheman, 1850 )
status

Treatment

Spaethiella rugosa ( Boheman, 1850) View in CoL

Porphyraspis rugosa Boheman, 1850: 96 (original description).

Porphyraspis picina Boheman, 1862: 40 (original description), syn. nov.

Type localities. Porphyraspis picina : ‘Bahia’; D. rugosa : ‘Brasilia’.

Type material examined. Porphyraspis picina : SYNTYPE: pinned: ‘ Bahia [w, p, cb] || Sommer [w, p, s] || Type. [w, p, s] || NHRS-JLKB | 000022626 [w, p, cb]’ ( NHRS).

Porphyraspis rugosa : HOLOTYPE: pinned, ‘64. | Brasil | 74 | rugosum | Boh [additionally written in pencil] Pty [w, hw, cb, green frame]’ ( ZSMC).

Remarks. BOHEMAN (1862) described Porphyraspis picina and differentiated it from P. rugosa by the darker colour of elytra. I have compared types of both taxa and in my opinion they are conspecific as they have identical formation of elytral costae, punctation, and shape of pronotum. Porphyraspis rugosa was based on a teneral, partially sclerotized and coloured specimen, resulting in a paler colouration than fully sclerotized P. picina . For these reasons I synonymize the latter taxon with P. rugosa .

Distribution. Brazil: Bahia ( BOHEMAN 1862).