Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zitteliana.97.115688 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA2DA079-4906-4AC8-AE11-05E21BBF12B9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63E480A4-87FC-513E-B6B0-F7E8ED9C5D97 |
treatment provided by |
Zitteliana by Pensoft (2023-12-13 10:21:30, last updated 2024-11-27 09:08:25) |
scientific name |
Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow) |
status |
|
Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow)
Figs 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11 , 12 View Figure 12
*1858 Capulus parvus sp. nov. - Swallow (in Shumard and Swallow): 205.
1967 Platyceras (Orthonychia) parvum (Swallow, 1858) - Yochelson and Saunders: 173 [additional synonymy and chresonymy therein].
1999 Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858) - Bandel and Frýda: text-fig. 1, pl. 2, figs 5-8, pl. 3 figs 1-2.
2005 Orthonychia parva - Frýda: 382, fig. 3D.
2008a Orthonychia parva - Frýda et al.: 254, fig. 10.8E, G.
2009 Orthonychia parva (Shumard & Swallow, 1858) - Frýda et al.: 112, 116, fig. 5C-D.
2012 Orthonychia parva - Frýda et al.: 417, fig. 14E, M.
2014 Pseudorthonychia - Nützel: 491, fig. 14E, H.
Material.
6 specimens (SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 117-122) from the Finis Shale Member of the Graham Formation (late Pennsylvanian , Virgillian , North Central Texas, USA) at the locality TXV-200: Lost Creek Lake emergency spillway at dam, approximately 4 km northeast of Jacksboro , Jack County, Texas on Texas Highway 59. AMNH Locality 5562, 33°14'11.17"N, 98°07'11.33"W, 33.230, -98.136 GoogleMaps .
Description.
Shell limpet-shaped; protoconch (description largely based on SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 117, Figs 9A View Figure 9 , 12 View Figure 12 ) with an initial bulb (Fig. 12 I View Figure 12 ) slightly elongated, 100-120 µm long, 70-75 µm wide, terminating in a slight constriction; width of initial bulb at 100 µm shell length 70-80 µm; shell after initial bulb forming a straight tube slowly increasing in width (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 II); dextral coiling starts at 270-360 µm shell length and coiling comprises 100-180° (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 III) until strong co-marginal ribs develop on the shell; the smooth initial shell has the form of a hook that encloses a central gap i. e., it is openly coiled; terminal width of whorl of initial smooth shell 0.5-0.6 mm; smooth initial whorl followed by rapidly expanding shell portion with strong collabral ribs (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 IV); ribs separated by wider interspaces, prosocyrt in apical view and prosocline in lateral view; initial smooth shell part resting on axially ribbed shell; shell part with strong axial ribs has width of 0.8-1 mm at termination; shell distinctly and abruptly widening after initial shell with axial ribs resulting in a cap-shaped morphology (Fig. 12 V View Figure 12 ), transition at an angle; following shell cap-shaped with variable co-marginal ornament; one specimens shows fine longitudinal lirae on the teleoconch (Fig. 10B6 View Figure 10 ).
Discussion.
Orthonychia parva is widely distributed throughout the Carboniferous of the US ( Yochelson and Saunders 1967). It has also been reported from the Pennsylvanian of North Central Texas (Mineral Wells Fm.) ( Plummer and Moore 1921) although not from the Finis Shale. To our knowledge, Knight (1934, figs 1d-g) reported the only specimens (four) with preserved protoconchs. Two of these specimens were also illustrated in detail (SEM) by Bandel and Frýda (1999, pl. 2 figs 5-8): (reproduced by Frýda 2005, fig. 3D; Frýda et al. 2008a, fig. 10.8 E, G; Frýda 2012, fig. 14E,M; Nützel 2014, fig. 14E, H, erroneously as Pseudorthonychia ). The same type of protoconch with stretched initial part and open coiling has been reported for the Devonian Praenatica cheloti by Frýda et al. (2009).
The present shell displays considerable ontogenetic change. There can be little doubt that the initial bulb represents the embryonic shell as was also concluded by Bandel and Frýda (1999), Frýda et al. (2008b), and Frýda (2012). Its small size of 100-120 µm × 70 µm suggests indirect, planktotrophic larval development. The question is at which stage the larval shell terminates and the teleoconch starts. Knight (1934) for the first time reported and described this type of protoconch and noticed its morphology which is unusual for gastropods ('curious vermiform nuclei’). He described the ‘nucleus’ as a narrow vermiform hook of one smooth revolution. The abrupt expansion of the shell which then bears co-marginal ribs was called by him ‘neanic’ i. e., as representing the early juvenile teleoconch. By contrast, based on the restudy of Knight’s (1934) material from the Labette Shale, Bandel and Frýda (1999) and Frýda (2012) assumed that the axially ribbed part following the smooth hook-like shells belongs to the larval shell. Here, we follow Knight’s (1934) interpretation because the smooth shell terminates abruptly and the size of the following axially ribbed portion of the shell (here Fig. 12 View Figure 12 IV) has a width of ca. 2 mm at its termination which is too large for a larval shell. Hence the larval shell of O. parva comprises portions I-III as given in Fig. 12 View Figure 12 .
The change from a straight narrow tube to a coiled tube (Fig. 12 View Figure 12 II to III) is readily explained: it would be highly disadvantageous for the pediveliger to settle with an entirely straight narrow tube (stretched, uncoiled shell tube would probably be vulnerable and hinder locomotion) and therefore coiling in the last period of larval life does make sense as a preparation for benthic life. The early axially ribbed teleoconch was probably formed by the crawling juvenile and the sudden widening of the shell could indicate the start of the sedentary life on crinoids.
Bandel, K, Fryda, J, 1999. Notes on the evolution and higher classification of the subclass Neritimorpha (Gastropoda) with the description of some new taxa. Geologica et Palaeontologica 33: 219 - 235
Fryda, J, 2005. Gastropods. In: Taylor, PD, Lewis, DN, Eds., Fossil invertebrates. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts: 378 - 388, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369396-9/00040-X
Fryda, J, Nuetzel, A, Wagner, PJ, 2008a. Paleozoic Gastropoda. In: Ponder, WF, Lindberg, DR, Eds., Phylogeny and evolution of the Mollusca. University of California Press, Berkely, Los Angeles, London: 239 - 270, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520250925.003.0010
Fryda, J, Racheboeuf, PR, Frydova, B, 2008b. Mode of life of early Devonian Orthonychia protei (Neritimorpha, Gastropoda) inferred from its post-larval shell ontogeny and muscle scars. Bulletin of Geosciences 83: 491 - 502, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.2008.04.491
Fryda, J, Racheboeuf, PR, Frydova, B, Ferrova, L, Mergl, M, Berkyova, S, 2009. Platyceratid gastropods - stem group of patellogastropods, neritimorphs or something else? Bulletin of Geosciences 84: 107-120. https://doi.org/10.3140/bull.geosci.1125
Fryda, J, 2012. Phylogeny of Palaeozoic gastropods inferred from their ontogeny. In: Talent, JA, Ed., Earth and Life - Global biodiversity, extinction intervals and biogeographic perturbations through time. Series: International Year of Planet Earth. Springer, New York: 395 - 435, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3428-1_12
Knight, JB, 1934. The gastropods of the St. Louis, Missouri, Pennsylvanian outlier: The Euomphalidae and Platyceratidae. Journal of Paleontology 8: 139 - 166
Nuetzel, A, 2014. Larval ecology and morphology in fossil gastropods. Palaeontology 57: 479 - 503, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12104
Plummer, FB, Moore, RC, 1921. Stratigraphy of the Pennsylvanian formations of north-central Texas. Texas University Bulletin 2132: 1 - 237
Yochelson, EL, Saunders, BW, 1967. A bibliographic index of North American Late Paleozoic Hyolitha, Amphineura, Scaphopoda, and Gastropoda. Geological Survey Bulletin 1210: 1 - 271
Figure 9. Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow), two juvenile specimens with uncoiled, hook-like protoconchs in various views; Late Pennsylvanian Finis Shale Member, Graham Formation, North-central Texas. (A) SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 117. (A 1) Oblique anterior view. (A 2) Oblique dorsal view. (A 3) Dorsal view. (A 4) Lateral view, openly coiled protoconch well visible. (A 5) Oblique lateral view. (A 6) Detail initial whorl including openly coiled protoconch. (A 7, A 8) Detail early teleoconch at rapid widening of shell, openly coiled protoconch well visible. (A 9) Detail of straight part of openly coiled protoconch including initial bulb. (A 10) Detail encrustation at transition from smooth protoconch to ribbed early teleoconch. (B) SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 118. (B 1) Lateral view, openly coiled protoconch well visible. (B 2) Apertural view. (B 3) Oblique lateral view, openly coiled protoconch well visible. (B 4) Oblique anterior view. (B 5) Detail of shell to show foliated micro-structure.
Figure 10. Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow), Late Pennsylvanian Finis Shale Member, Graham Formation, North-central Texas. (A) SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 121. (A 1) Apical view. (A 2, A 3) Apertural views at different angles. (A 4, A 5) Protoconch remains in lateral view. (A 6) Protoconch remains in apical view. (B) SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 122. (B 1, B 2) Apertural views at different angles. (B 3, B 4) Lateral views at different angles. (B 5, B 7) Protoconch remains and early teleoconch with strengthened growth lines. (B 6) Detail of early teleoconch ornament consisting of strengthened growth lines and very delicate longitudinal lirae. (B 8 - B 10) Protoconch remains in lateral views.
Figure 11. Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow). (A) SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 119, juvenile shell portion, Late Pennsylvanian Finis Shale Member, Graham Formation, North-central Texas. (A 1) Lateral view, openly coiled protoconch well visible. (A 2) Oblique anterior view. (A 3) Oblique lateral view. (A 4) Oblique apertural view. (A 5) Openly coiled, smooth protoconch. (A 6) Openly coiled, smooth protoconch in apical view and early teleoconch in lateral view. (A 7) Openly coiled, smooth protoconch and early teleoconch. (B) From Bandel and Fryda 1999, pl. 2, figs 6, 8, Pennsylvanian Labette Shale, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. (B 1) lateral view, openly coiled protoconch well visible. (B 2) Openly coiled protoconch well visible including initial bulb, straight and coiled parts followed by early teleoconch with so-marginal ribbing.
Figure 12. Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow), SNSB-BSPG 2020 XCI 117, juvenile specimen with uncoiled, hook-like protoconch (same as Fig. 9 A 4); Late Pennsylvanian Finis Shale Member, Graham Formation, North-central Texas. I-III smooth protoconch consisting of initial bulb formed within the egg (I), straight part of larval shell (II) coiled part of larval shell (III) first portion of teleoconch with strong ribbing (IV) second portion of teleoconch with rapidly widening (V).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Orthonychia parva (Swallow, 1858 in Shumard and Swallow)
Nuetzel, Alexander, Ebbestad, Jan Ove, Seuss, Barbara, Munnecke, Axel, Mapes, Royal H. & Cook, Alex G. 2023 |
2014 Pseudorthonychia
Bandel & Fryda 1999 |