Paraploderus grandis, Makranczy, 2016

Makranczy, György, 2016, Review Of The Genus Paraploderus Herman, 1970 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Oxytelinae), Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 62 (1), pp. 59-116 : 70-72

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.62.1.59.2016

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C3C8CD4C-BE30-4829-A61A-D2DBD6E98877

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63BF5FDA-7CB1-4AC3-ABA8-4FBC71C8AF46

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:63BF5FDA-7CB1-4AC3-ABA8-4FBC71C8AF46

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Paraploderus grandis
status

sp. nov.

Paraploderus grandis View in CoL sp. n.

(Figs 12–17, 89)

Typematerial – Holotype (m): KENYA: Mt. Elgon, [Kaptegariver], 2380 m [01°10’N, 34°43’E], 17.I.1979, leg. Th. Palm, [sifting moist grass litter] ( MZLU) GoogleMaps ; Paratypes (34): same dataasholotype (1 m, 1 f, MZLU) ; Mt. Elgon , 1900–2500 m, 12.I.–5.II.1979, leg. Th. Palm (1 m, 8, MZLU, 4, MHNG, 1, HNHM) ; Mt. AberdaresprèsentréeduParkNational, 2300 m [00°27.5’S, 36°51.0’E], 25.XI.1974, leg. V. Mahnert & J-L. Perret (45), tamisagefeuilles mortes et bois mort (5, MHNG, 1, SDEI, 1, ZMHB, 1, NHMW, 1, SMNS, 1, AMNH, 1, FMNH, 1, NMPC, 1, MNHP, 1, CNCI, 1, ISNB) GoogleMaps ; UGANDA: Mt. Elgon , Kapkwata, 2250 m [01°21‘41“N, 34°37‘46“E], 30. V.1993, leg. G. Cuccodoro & D. Erne (16a), vegetationaldebris andoldrottingtrunkinpineplantation, sifted (1, MHNG) GoogleMaps ; D. R. CONGO: ParcNational Albert , MassifRuwenzori , Kirivata (Migeri), 1760 m [00°15‘N, 29°47‘E], 10–20.IV.1953, leg. P. Vanschuytbroeck & J. Kekenbosch (3171-3202) (1, MRAC, 1 m, BMNH) GoogleMaps .

Description – Measurements (in mm, n = 10): EW = 0.56 (0.54–0.58); TW = 0.59 (0.56– 0.62); PW = 0.66 (0.62–0.69); SW = 0.65 (0.62–0.68); AW = 0.85 (0.81–0.90); HL = 0.39 (0.38– 0.41); EL = 0.12 (0.11–0.13); TL = 0.14 (0.13–0.15); PL = 0.46 (0.43–0.49); SL = 0.56 (0.53–0.62); SC = 0.52 (0.49–0.57); FB = 1.51 (1.42–1.63); BL = 3.16 (2.89–3.42). Habitus as in Fig. 89. Pro- View Figs 88–90 notumandelytradarkbrownwithreddishtint. Headblackishdarkbrown, towardscly- peuslighter, epistomalsuturedarker. Abdomendarkbrown, withmorereddishapicesof tergites. Legs, basalantennomeresandmouthpartsmediumbrown, antennalarticles 3–10 darkbrown, ultimateantennomerelighteratapex. Head transversewithrounded, bulging templeswiderthaneyes. Clypeusalmostimpunctatewithonlyfeebletracesofmicrosculptureandthefinestpuncturesonsurface. Epistomalsuturebetweentipsofsupraantennal prominencesoronlyalittlebehindimaginarylineconnectingthem. Medialportionofoc- cipitalgroovebendinganteriorly, neckmediallyshiny, laterallywithtracesofcoriaceous microsculpturewithisodiametriccells. Vertexwithindefinite-borderedbutlargeanddeep puncturesonlyonimpressedparts, elevatedmiddleunpunctured; somealsoneartemplesbutventrallypunctationturningintoruggednessaroundeyes, obscuringapostocularridge. Faintlongitudinalimpressionsrunningonbothsidesofvertexfromepistomal suturetooccipitalgroove, becomingmoremarkedposteriorly. Headsurfaceotherwise shiny, withoutmicrosculpture. Pronotum withcomplete, thinmarginalbead. Surfaceshiny, withoutanymicrosculpturebutpuncturedlikehead, withscattered, indefinite-bordered, mostlyratherlargepits, slightlyumbilicate. Longitudinalmidlineunmarkedbutpunc- turesmissingonabroadstripeonbothsidesandpartlyalonghindmargin. Onbothsides ofmidlinemiddle-posterior 3/5 ofdiscslightlyimpressed. Elytra withdiscgentlyconvex, slightlyimpressedanteriorly, twoverythinandshallowlongitudinalimpressionsalong suturebehindscutellum. Epipleuralridgepresentonalmostentirelength. Thinmarginal beadwithobscureconnectiontoepipleuralridgecontinuingalongposteriormargin, not reachingsuturalcorner, slightlycurvinganteriorlybeforeit. Alongsutureveryfinemar- ginalbeadconspicuousonlybecauseofdarkercolour. Elytralpunctationmoderatelydeep, equallyspaced, moderatelysparse, missingonathin, slightlyelevatedstripealongsuture. Abdomen shinyandsmoothwithonlytinyinsertionpointsofsetaeandextremelyfaint coriaceousmicrosculpturewithisodiametriccells. MalesterniteVIIIasinFig. 15, aedeagus asinFigs 13–14, femalesterniteVIIIasinFig. 16, spermathecaasinFig. 17.

Distribution – Thepresent (restricted) selectionoftypematerialispartlyduetothe factthatthistaxonhassomewhatreducedwingsandisapparentlyfoundathigheral- Figs 13–17. Paraploderus grandis sp. n. 13 = aedeagus, lateral view, 14 = aedeagus, frontal view (parameral setation shown on left), 15 = sternite VIII, male, 16 = sternite VIII, female, 17 = spermatheca. Scales: 0.1 mm for Fig. 17, 0.16 mm for Figs 13–14, 0.3 mm for Figs 15–16. titudes. Amorenarrowrangeofspecimensandlocalitiesperhapsensuresamoreclear identityforthistaxon; theprevioustypeseriesinfactmaybeamixtureofseveralclosely relatedspecies. Asrecognizedhere, thedistributionof P. grandis isconfinedtotheRuwen- zorirange, Mt. AberdaresandMt. Elgon. Atthelatterlocationtherecordedhabitatwas “primevalforestareauphillMountElgonatKaptegariver, deciduousforests, shrub-and tallherbaceousvegetation” – thisdoesnotsuggestaverynarrowdistribution, butfurther materialandworkisnecessarytoclarifytheexactdistributionandvariability.

Etymology – Namedaftertheratherlargesizeofthespecies.

Remarks – ThespecieswasfirstrecognizedbyP. M. Hammond, who labelled a series of specimens with the name ‘ grandis ’ in the 1970s, but it remainedunpublished – hisseries, however, appearsratherheterogenous. At leastitisdifficulttodecidewhetherthespecimensfromavarietyoflocalities reallybelongtothesamespeciesorrepresentcloselyallieddistinctforms. A furthercomplicationiscausedbythefactthatthepresentauthorusedthis Paraploderus speciesforaphylogeneticanalysisin 2005 ( MAKRANCZY 2006) misidentifiedas “ P. parcepunctus ”. Adecadelateritisimpossibletodeter- minewhatcircumstancesledtothisconfusionofidentities. Havingconsid- eredthesefacts, whilekeepinghisname‘ grandis ’, onlythetwospecimens fromHammond’soriginaltypelocalityofhismanuscriptnameareincluded inthenewtypeseries (includingtheformer‘ holotype’), andastheholotype exactlythesamespecimen (collectedbyThurePalmin 1979 atKaptegariver, tributaryofSuamr.) thatwasusedintheanalysis (aedeagusillustratedinfig. 92, p. 76, MAKRANCZY 2006) is chosen. Almost all of Hammond’s other specimensarefemales, thetwomalesfoundwereinlessthanperfectcondition, onehastheaedeagusdissected (parameresdetached), theotherhasaweakly sclerotizedaedeagus, makingitverytrickytodrawsolidconclusiononthe identitiesofthesespecimens.

MZLU

Lund University

MHNG

Museum d'Histoire Naturelle

HNHM

Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum)

V

Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium

NHMW

Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien

SMNS

Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkund Stuttgart

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

FMNH

Field Museum of Natural History

NMPC

National Museum Prague

MNHP

Princeton University

CNCI

Canadian National Collection Insects

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

MRAC

Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF