Coptotriche Walsingham, 1890

Stonis, Jonas R., Diškus, Arūnas, Remeikis, Andrius, Orlovskytė, Svetlana, Solis, Alma, Paulavičiūtė, Brigita, Xu, Jiasheng & Dai, Xiaohua, 2023, Genera of Tischeriidae (Lepidoptera): a review of the global fauna, with descriptions of new taxa, Zootaxa 5333 (1), pp. 1-131 : 28-30

1. Genus Coptotriche Walsingham, 1890

( Figs 80–142 )

Coptotriche Walsingham, 1890: 322–323 . Type species: Tischeria complanoides Frey & Boll, 1873: 220–221 (junior syn. of T. zelleriella Clemens, 1859 ).

Emmetia Leraut, 1993: 64–65 .

Type species: Coptotriche marginea (Haworth), 1828: 556 .

Diagnosis. In the male genitalia, species of Coptotriche are characterized by presence of a transtilla (the only Tischeriidae genus with a transtilla), wide valva, spined anellus, and a spined diaphragm of the tegumen; phallus is either tulip-shaped with numerous small or large spines or with two large apical lobes bearing a few spines. In the female genitalia, the genus is usually characterized by a strongly developed, heavily folded accessory sac, and a proximally wide, usually elaborated (twisted) ductus spermathecae. Fully developed leaf mines of Coptotriche are characterized by the folded margin of the mined leaf (folded leaf mine), except for some East and South East Asian species; a round nidus inside the leaf mine is inconspicuous. See Tabs 2 , 3 for occurrence of these diagnostic characters in other genera of Tischeriidae .

Notes. External characters of adults, including wing venation are not informative and, therefore, insufficient for differentiation of Coptotriche because of their general uniformity or, in some cases, variability of these characters within the entire family.

Molecular data provided relatively strong support for distinctness of this genus (see Discussion). Depending on the selected outgroup, Coptotriche is either the sister taxon to Coptotrichoides + Dishkeya ( Fig. 62 ) or the most distinct, basal genus, separate from the rest of the Tischeriidae genera ( Figs 63, 64 ).

Adult ( Figs 105–120 ). Head: frontal tuft overlapping the frons, comprised of long, slender lamellar scales; sometimes frontal tuft is comprised of two different types of scales: pale, slender lamellar scales and dark, piliform scales ( Xu et al. 2021); occasionally frontal tuft is extremely long and comprised of slender lamellar scales, e.g., in Coptotriche imperator Puplesis & Diškus ( Diškus & Puplesis 2003) ; collar distinctly paired, comprised of slender lamellar scales. Forewing often with a small dark tornal spot; forewing color varies from almost uniform, yellowish ochre or dark ochre with some grey-black scales to entirely dark brown; occasionally forewing with four large, pale, irregular spots. Hindwing usually slender, occasionally significantly wider in males of a few species; male androconial scales in only a few species.

Male genitalia ( Figs 80–98 ). Uncus with two large (always long and basally wide) lateral lobes which look triangular in ventral view. Socii membranous, often large, usually weakly, occasionally distinctly paired, and always spinose, with numerous tiny spines. Tegumen short or very short, with a unique, distinctly spinose diaphragm; pseudognathos absent. In lateral view, valva usually very wide and rounded or truncated apically; basal process of the valva short; occasionally, e.g., C. basipectinella valva with a few distinctive pectens on basal half ( Puplesis et al. 2004). Transtilla present, always with a distinctive, long, or sometimes short transverse bar; sublateral processes of the transtilla relatively short; occasionally, transverse bar of the valva with a large triangular posterior lobe. Anellus membranous, ring or conus-shaped, usually with numerous small spines; juxta absent. Vinculum usually short or very short, with a band-like or triangular ventral plate; sometimes ventral plate with a short or long anterior process medially. Phallus usually tulip-like, with numerous spines on a wide apical lobe or with two apical lobes possessing two or four large spines; in some two lobed-phalli spines are minute and numerous or absent.

Female genitalia ( Figs 99–104 ). Ovipositor lobes usually large or very large and usually covered with relatively large, robust modified setae, peg-setae; the gap between ovipositor lobes varies from relatively broad to narrow; second pair of ovipositor lobes two–three times smaller or equal in size in comparison to main ovipositor lobes; second pair of ovipositor lobes sometimes with long wide setae instead usual piliform chetae. Lateral lobes usually short, rarely long, and wide, occasionally absent. Apophyses often stout (robust), large and heavily chitinized. Anterior apophyses significantly to slightly shorter than posterior apophyses. Prela usually with three pairs of projections; inner pair with a slightly to strongly widened base, sometimes rod-like. Caudal sclerite strongly developed, inverted U-shaped, rounded caudally. Antrum absent. Accessory sac usually folded, slender; ductus spermathecae usually very wide and variously folded, sometimes with distinctive spines (pectinations) in proximal half, slender, usually with 0.5–2 coils (sometimes with many small, occasionally large coils) in distal half; vesicle often small, irregularly-shaped, occasionally large, oval-shaped. Corpus bursae varies from long to very short, gradually narrowing towards caudal end or with a short slender “neck”; occasionally slender part (the “neck”) is of the same length as the wider part; pectinations of corpus bursae absent, only occasionally cover whole corpus bursa.

Bionomics. The genus is characterized by the greatest host-plant diversity among Tischeriidae . However, more than a third of the currently known species have been reared from Rosaceae host plants, and almost a third from Fagaceae host plants; the remaining species are known to be feed on Combretaceae and Symplocaceae , also nine species feed on the following nine families (one species per family): Hypericaceae , Phyllanthaceae , Betulaceae , Staphyleaceae , Anacardiaceae , Nyssaceae , Ericaceae , Theaceae , and Apocynaceae . In total, 13 host-plant families are utilized by Coptotriche . Host-plant relationships of a third Coptotriche species are still unknown. Larvae mine leaves and produce irregular blotch-like (usually elongated) leaf mines; occasionally, initial part of the mine is gallery-like with a few short but slender lateral galleries. Frass is not deposited in leaf mines; occasionally very small amounts of scattered frass can be found in a leaf mine. Usually leaf mines are close to the leaf margin and the mining larva folds a margin of the mined leaf before pupation. The nidus is invisible through the epidermis, so dissection of the mine is necessary for study of the nidus.

Species diversity and geographical distribution. The total number of currently described Coptotriche species is 66. The majority are from the temperate regions: North America, Europe, and non-tropical Asia, including the Russian Far East and Japan. A substantial number of Coptotriche species have been described from South and South East Asia: C. compta (Meyrick) ( Meyrick 1915b) , C. imperator Puplesis & Diškus , C. inclinata Puplesis & Diškus , C. thailandi Puplesis & Diškus , C. terminaliae Puplesis & Diškus , C. bifurcula Puplesis & Diškus ( Diškus & Puplesis 2003) , C. camptotheca Xu & Dai ( Figs 97 , 104 ), C. turpinia Xu & Dai , C. asiana Diškus & Stonis ( Fig. 113 ) ( Xu et al. 2021); one new South East Asian species, C. sapaensis Diškus & Stonis , sp. nov., is described in this publication (see below). Some species were recorded from South Africa: C. zimbabwiensis Puplesis & Diškus , C. africana Puplesis & Diškus ( Fig. 83 ), C. basipectinella Puplesis & Diškus , C. versicolor Stonis, Diškus & Mey ( Puplesis & Diškus 2003; Stonis et al. 2019a), and one odd species, C. alavelona Lees & Stonis , from Madagascar ( Lees & Stonis 2007; Lees & Minet 2022). Recently, a few species of Coptotriche were also discovered to occur in Central America: C. forsteroniae Stonis & Diškus (Stonis & Diškus 2008) , and C. pulverea (Walsingham) (Stonis et al. 2008) , a species formerly known only from the Caribbean ( Walsingham 1897). A couple species were also discovered from South America: C. carmencita Stonis & Diškus from Peru and C. parvisacculata Diškus & Stonis ( Figs 85 , 90, 98 , 108 ) from Argentina ( Stonis et al. 2019b).

Figures

FIGURE 62. The Maximum Likelihood tree of 11 randomly selected sequences of species representing 11 genera of Tischeriidae (Table 1 + downloaded Paratischeria ferruginea HM244395, Neotischeria neotropicana HM244391, Dishkeya bifurcata LNAUT3265-15, Coptotrichoides serjaniphaga OK017167) based on the 608 bp long mtDNA CO1-5’ sequences). The Kimura 2-parameter model (1.000 replicates) was used to calculate divergence. The best supported and resolved dichotomies are highlighted. The morphological differences of genitalia are shown to the right of the tree

FIGURES 80–87. Male genital capsule of Coptotriche. 80, C. minuta Diškus & Stonis, Far Eastern Russia (Stonis et al. 2014); 81, C. citripenipennella (Clemens), USA, slide no. 28961 BMNH; 82, C. gaunacella (Duponchel), Turkmenistan, a genitalia mount in glycerin (MfN); 83, C. africana Puplesis & Diškus, South Africa (Stonis et al. 2019a); 84, C. confusa (Braun), USA (Stonis et al. 2020c); 85, C. parvisacculata Diškus & Stonis, Argentina (Stonis et al. 2019b); 86, C. longiciliatella (Rebel), Tenerife, Canary Is., slide no. Diškus088 ZMUC; 87, C. paulula Diškus, Tajikistan (after Diškus 1998)

FIGURES 88–98. Valva andphallus of Coptotriche.88, C.berberella (De Prins),Marocco, first documentationof paratype no.Diškus093 ZMUC; 89, C. longiciliatella (Rebel), Tenerife, Canary Is., slide no. Diškus133 ZMUC; 90, C. parvisacculata Diškus & Stonis,Argentina (Stonis et al. 2019b); 91, C. paulula Diškus, Tajikistan (Diškus 1998); 92, C. confusa (Braun), USA (Stonis et al. 2020c); 93, C. berberella, paratype no. Diškus089 ZMUC; 94, C. longiciliatella, slide no. Diškus088 ZMUC; 95, C. citripenipennella (Clemens), USA, slide no. 28961 NHMUK; 96, C. paulula; 97, C. camptotheca Xu & Dai, China (Xu et al. 2021); 98, C. parvisacculata (Stonis et al. 2019b)

FIGURES 99–104. Female genitalia of Coptotriche. 99, C. aenea (Frey & Boll), USA, first documentation of lectotype, slide no. 28944 NHMUK; 100, C. szoecsi (Kasy), Austria, genitalia slide no. Diškus066 ZMUC; 101, C. longiciliatella (Rebel), Tenerife, Canary Is., slide no. Diškus068 ZMUC; 102, C. angusticolella (Duponchel), Slovakia, slide no. Diškus079 ZMUC; 103, C. gaunacella (Duponchel), Poland, slide no. Diškus129 ZMUC; 104, C. camptotheca Xu & Dai, China (Stonis et al. 2019b)

FIGURES 105–113. Adults of Coptotriche. 105, C. longiciliatella (Rebel), Tenerife, Canary Is.; 106, C. minuta Diškus & Stonis, Far Eastern Russia, holotype (Stonis et al. 2014); 107, C. berberella (De Prins), Marocco, paratype; 108, C. parvisacculata Diškus & Stonis, Argentina, holotype (Stonis et al. 2019b); 109, C. longiciliatella; 110, C. gaunacella (Duponchel), Turkmenistan; 111, C. angusticolella (Duponchel), Belgium; 112, C. rosella (Gerasimov), Uzbekistan; 113, C. asiana Diškus & Stonis, Vietnam, paratype (Xu et al. 2021)

FIGURES 114–120. Adults of Coptotriche sapaensis Diškus & Stonis, sp. nov., northern Vietnam. 114–116, head; 117–120 general view of holotype and paratypes (MfN)

FIGURES 121–125. Male genitalia of Coptotriche sapaensis Diškus & Stonis, sp. nov., northern Vietnam, holotype, genitalia slide no. AD1111 (MfN). 121, socii and apex of phallus; 122, uncus and apical part of phallus; 123, general view; 124, 125, spines of phallus

FIGURES 126–130. Male genitalia of Coptotriche sapaensis Diškus & Stonis, sp. nov., northern Vietnam, paratype, genitalia slide no. AD1106 (MfN). 126, 127, socii, tegumen and spined diaphragm; 128, valva and transtilla, ventral view; 129, valva, lateral view; 130, phallus

FIGURES 131–135. Female genitalia of Coptotriche sapaensis Diškus & Stonis, sp. nov., northern Vietnam, paratype, genitalia slide no. AD1109 (MfN). 131, general view; 132, ovipositor lobes; 133, rounded accessory sac and proximal part of ductus spermathecae; 134, ovipositor lobes; 135, accessory sac and “neck” (slender proximal part) of corpus bursae

FIGURES 136–142. Bionomics of Coptotriche sapaensis Diškus & Stonis, sp. nov. 136, 137, habitat, elevation 1920 m, 15 km NW of Sapa, 22°20’58”N, 103°46’16”E, Lao Cai Prov., northern Vietnam; 138–142, leaf mines on unidentified Symplocaceae plant

FIGURES 63, 64. The Maximum Likelihood trees of Tischeriidae based on the 608 bp long mtDNA CO1-5’ sequences. The Kimura 2-parameter model (1.000 replicates) was used to calculate divergence. The best supported and resolved dichotomies are highlighted. 63, using the same (as in the Fig. 62) 11 randomly selected sequences of species representing 11 genera of Tischeriidae; the families of host plants are shown to the right of the tree; 64, same, but omitting Rytietia uncinata sp. nov.; the distribution of species is shown to the right of the tree