Cryptobias ocellatus Dohrn, 1879
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4603.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:567CEE35-88A5-40A0-8040-F2FAD45CCF25 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5F5F755B-3801-C20B-61A1-F884EC3A1FF6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cryptobias ocellatus Dohrn, 1879 |
status |
|
Cryptobias ocellatus Dohrn, 1879 View in CoL (= Cryptobias coccineus , part; = Chydarteres dimidiatus dimidiatus (Fabricius, 1787) , part).
( Figures 30–33 View FIGURES 26–33 )
Cryptobias ocellatus Dohrn, 1879: 459 View in CoL ; Monné, 2018a: 879 (cat.; in syn.). According to Dohrn (1879) (translated): “Apart from the general statement: Brazil, I cannot comment on the country of origin, since it comes from a curiosity merchant, who for many years roamed the great empire.” Monné & Giesbert (1992) reported: “The holotype of Cryptobias ocellatus Dohrn 1879:459 View in CoL is a composite specimen, with the head of Chydarteres dimidiatus dimidiatus (Fabricius, 1787) View in CoL and the body of Cryptobias coccineus Dupont, 1834 View in CoL .” Apparently, the source of this information was Ubirajara R. Martins de Souza, who examined the holotype and added a label with this information ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17–25 ).
Monné (2018a) and Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2018) reported the holotype being deposited in the CMSP collection. Actually, it is in the ZMPA collection.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cryptobias ocellatus Dohrn, 1879
Pirkl, Jiří, Santos-Silva, Antonio & Casari, Sônia A. 2019 |
Cryptobias ocellatus
Dohrn, C. A. 1879: 459 |
Dohrn, C. A. 1879: 459 |