Austrogymnocnemia, Esben-Petersen, 1917
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4796.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66DD1FEB-6BDE-4AEB-8A7B-96594371E9C5 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5F2387E7-7049-FFE9-FF5F-FF3FFA751919 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Austrogymnocnemia |
| status |
|
Key to species of Austrogymnocnemia View in CoL View at ENA
1 Forewing: posterior Banksian line present, prefork area usually with two rows of cells (one row in A. forcipata View in CoL ) ( Fig. 24c View FIGURE 24 ); profemoral sense hair usually present; pronotum wider than long or as long as wide; male: paramere well developed, mediuncus when present reduced or long with base much wider than apex................................................. 5
- Forewing: posterior Banksian line absent, prefork area with one row of cells (two rows in some A. secula ) ( Fig. 67c View FIGURE 67 ); profemoral sense hair absent; pronotum longer than wide; male: paramere usually weakly developed, much narrower than gonarcus, mediuncus narrow, thin and acute ( Figs. 68 View FIGURE 68 b–c)........................................ ( secula species group) … 2
2 (1’) Tibial spurs present: forewing with dark marks ( Fig. 67c View FIGURE 67 )..................................................... 3
- Tibial spurs absent; forewing hyaline ( Fig. 74c View FIGURE 74 ).............................................. A. tatarnici sp. nov.
3 (2) Mesonotum black with broad longitudinal pale lines ( Fig. 67b View FIGURE 67 ); hind wing with small rhegmal mark ( Fig. 67c View FIGURE 67 ); female posterior gonapophyses without cavisetae ( Fig. 68d View FIGURE 68 )............................................................. 4
- Mesonotum mostly black with thin longitudinal pale lines ( Fig. 72b View FIGURE 72 ); hind wing with a large rhegmal mark ( Fig. 72c View FIGURE 72 ); female posterior gonapophyses with several cavisetae apically ( Figs. 72 View FIGURE 72 d–e)...................................... A. secula
4 (3) Frons mostly pale, except for thin black lines circling the antennae dorsally ( Fig. 67a View FIGURE 67 ); pronotum set with short white setae; protarsus mostly brown; hind wing with a mark in poststigmal area ( Fig. 67c View FIGURE 67 )........................... A. parviprocta
- Frons pale ventrally and dark dorsally ( Fig. 63a View FIGURE 63 ); pronotum set with short black setae; protarsus mostly pale; hind wing without mark in poststigmal area ( Fig. 63c View FIGURE 63 )............................................................. A. mulesi
5 (1) Forewing costal area uniareolate in basal half ( Fig. 33c View FIGURE 33 ); ocular setae absent ( Fig. 33b View FIGURE 33 )............................. 7
- Forewing costal area biareolate in basal half ( Fig. 36c View FIGURE 36 ); ocular setae present ( Fig.35a View FIGURE 35 ).............................. 6
6 (5’) Antennae short, mid-length flagellomeres much wider than long ( Fig. 36a View FIGURE 36 ); ocular setae short and white; forewing membrane mostly hyaline with small brown marks; hind wing without a dark transverse band ( Fig. 36c View FIGURE 36 ).............. A. brevicornis View in CoL
- Antennae long, mid-length flagellomeres about as wide as long ( Fig. 61a View FIGURE 61 ); ocular setae long and black; forewing membrane mostly brown with small hyaline areas; hind wing with a broad, dark, transverse band ( Fig. 61c View FIGURE 61 ).............. A. mjobergi
7 (5) Tibial spurs absent................................................................................... 13
- Tibial spurs present................................................................................... 8
8 (7’) Male 9 th sternite emarginate apically ( Fig. 59d View FIGURE 59 ); female posterior gonapophyses without cavisetae ( Fig. 59e View FIGURE 59 )............ 9
- Male 9 th sternite not emarginate apically ( Fig. 41b View FIGURE 41 ); female posterior gonapophyses with cavisetae apically ( Fig. 41e View FIGURE 41 ).... 10
9 (8) Forewing mediocubital area with a long, dark, longitudinal line ( Fig. 31c View FIGURE 31 ); female pregenital plate rounded ( Fig. 32e View FIGURE 32 )................................................................................................ A. berthoudi
- Forewing mediocubital area without a dark longitudinal line ( Fig. 58c View FIGURE 58 ); female pregenital plate “goblet” shaped ( Fig. 59f View FIGURE 59 )............................................................................................ A. meteorica
10 (8’) Forewing prominantly broadened distally, posterior margin strongly convex in apical half ( Fig. 40c View FIGURE 40 ).................. 11
- Forewing nearly parallel sided distally, posterior margin weakly convex in apical half ( Fig. 47c View FIGURE 47 )..................... 12
11 (10) Hind wing with a large mark in poststigmal area ( Fig. 40c View FIGURE 40 ); protibia longer than protarsus ( Fig. 40a View FIGURE 40 ); frons black, but ventral corners pale ( Fig. 40a View FIGURE 40 ); male mediuncus short, apex broader than base ( Fig. 41c View FIGURE 41 ); female pregenital plate with a short ventral extension medially ( Fig. 41f View FIGURE 41 ).................................................................. A. conspersa
- Hind wing without a large mark in poststigmal area ( Fig. 45c View FIGURE 45 ); protibia as long as protarsus ( Fig. 45a View FIGURE 45 ); frons black, but ventral margin entirely pale ( Fig. 45a View FIGURE 45 ); male mediuncus long, apex narrower than base ( Fig. 46d View FIGURE 46 ); female pregenital plate without a ventral extension ( Fig. 46f View FIGURE 46 )..................................................................... A. dissoluta
12 (10’) Pronotum entirely black ( Fig. 47b View FIGURE 47 ); hind wing with a broad transverse brown band encompassing rhegmal area ( Fig. 47c View FIGURE 47 ); tibial spurs long (reaching T1 apex); female anterior gonapophysis a small rounded plate ( Fig. 48d View FIGURE 48 ).............. A. falsa
- Pronotum black with pale marks ( Fig. 38b View FIGURE 38 ); hind wing with a spot in rhegmal area ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ); tibial spurs short (reaching half of T1 length); female anterior gonapophysis absent ( Fig. 39d View FIGURE 39 )................................... A. ceciliae sp. nov.
13 (7) Female posterior gonapophysis apex recurved (anterior margin extended) ( Fig. 34e View FIGURE 34 ); male gonarcus with anterior margin down curved; male paramere with an apical hook ( Fig. 34b View FIGURE 34 ); forewing with no longitudinal lines ( Fig. 34c View FIGURE 34 )............................................................................................. ( bipunctata View in CoL species group) ... 14
- Female posterior gonapophysis apex rounded ( Fig. 44d View FIGURE 44 ); male gonarcus with anterior margin straight; male paramere without an apical hook ( Fig. 44b View FIGURE 44 ), forewing with a dark longitudinal line in mediocubital area, or surrounding anterior Banksian line ( Fig. 43c View FIGURE 43 ).......................................................................................... 19
14 (13) Profemur with a series of long white setae along dorsal surface ( Fig. 33a View FIGURE 33 )....................................... 15
- Profemur set with short white setae, or with a few long white setae at base ( Fig. 56a View FIGURE 56 ).............................. 17
15 (14) Hind wing without a dark transverse line in apical half, only a rounded mark ( Fig. 33c View FIGURE 33 )............................ 16
- Hind wing with a broad, dark transverse band in apical half ( Fig. 28c View FIGURE 28 ).................................... A. arcuata View in CoL
16 (15) Body mostly dark with small yellow marks; forewing with numerous brown marks surrounding the crossveins ( Fig. 33c View FIGURE 33 )............................................................................................ A. bipunctata View in CoL
- Body mostly grey with large yellow areas; forewing hyaline ( Fig. 65c View FIGURE 65 )................................... A. pallida View in CoL
17 (14’) Pronotum with a dark, continuous, longitudinal line medially ( Fig. 56b View FIGURE 56 ); forewing with dark marks ( Fig. 56c View FIGURE 56 ); male gonarcus with bent region on anterior margin shorter than straight region (lateral view) ( Fig. 57b View FIGURE 57 )........................... 18
- Pronotum with a dark, discontinuous, longitudinal line medially ( Fig. 49b View FIGURE 49 ); forewing hyaline ( Fig. 49c View FIGURE 49 ); male gonarcus with bent region on anterior margin longer than straight region (lateral view) ( Fig. 50a View FIGURE 50 )......................... A. forcipata View in CoL
18 (17) Frons and pronotum mostly dark brown ( Figs. 70 View FIGURE 70 a–b); forewing with light brown transverse lines ( Fig. 70c View FIGURE 70 ); male mediuncus present ( Fig. 71c View FIGURE 71 )............................................................... A. pseudomaculata sp. nov.
- Frons and pronotum mostly yellow ( Figs. 56 View FIGURE 56 a–b); forewing without transverse lines ( Fig. 56c View FIGURE 56 ); male mediuncus absent ( Fig. 57c View FIGURE 57 )...................................................................................... A. maculata View in CoL
19 (13’) Body mostly dark; clypeus with two dark rounded marks ( Fig. 54a View FIGURE 54 ); forewing with at least basal half of mediocubital area dark ( Fig. 54c View FIGURE 54 ).......................................................................................... 20
- Body mostly gray; clypeus entirely pale ( Fig. 43a View FIGURE 43 ); forewing mediocubital area hyaline ( Fig. 43c View FIGURE 43 )....... A. diehli sp. nov.
20 (19) Forewing mediocubital area with dark streak interrupted medially ( Fig. 52c View FIGURE 52 )............................. A. interrupta View in CoL
- Forewing mediocubital area with dark streak not interrupted medially ( Fig. 54c View FIGURE 54 )............................ A. lineata View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.