Ceraeocercus fuscipennis, Uvarov, 1910
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4608.3.12 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1E1581BF-5AFB-49A4-83BE-0B2423AC7D8C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5E1287C3-FFA5-FFA1-C982-FE1DFC13691F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ceraeocercus fuscipennis |
status |
|
Ceraeocercu s fuscipennis View in CoL fuscipennis Uvarov, 1910 New record for China
( Fig. 1 – 4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 )
Ceraeocercus fuscipennis fuscipennis Uvarov, 1910 View in CoL . Hor. Soc. ent. Ross. 39:382; Karabağ, 1961. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Ent. 11 (1): 1 – 41, 136; Pravdin, 1987. Ent. Rev. 66:81 – 91; KoЗak & Kemal, 2010. Cent. Ent. Stud. Misc. Pap. 154:3; Pokivailov, 2017. Ent. Rev. 97(4):491.
Type locality: Inder Lake in Uralsk Region (now Atyrau Province in Kazakhstan) .
Material examined: 3 males, China: Xinjiang: Qinghe. 1967. VI.28, Coll. Yonglin Chen ; 3 males, 3 females, China: Xinjiang: Qinghe. 1967. VII.10, Coll. Weishan Shen ; 1 male, 2 females, China: Xinjiang: Qinghe. 1975. VI.5, Coll. Yabang Sun.
Diagnosis. This subspecies differs from C. fuscipennis hindukushanus by length of tegmina and coloration of hind wings. Pronotum narrowing in prozona ( Fig. 1c View FIGURE 1 ); tegmina not exceeding knee of hind femora, with rounded margins ( Fig. 1b View FIGURE 1 ); hind wings dark blackish brown, reduced. In the latter species, tegmina extend beyond hind knee, and hind wings are brown with lighter fenestration.
Redescription. Pronotal disc narrowing from base to middle part, with straight anterior margin and an indistinct broadly obtuse concavity in middle ( Fig. 1c View FIGURE 1 ); first transverse sulcus distinct; median sulcus distinctly V-shaped, interrupted by a median line.
Male. Stridulatory file composed of about 49 – 50 widely-arranged teeth, which gradually become smaller from proximal one third part towards both ends ( Fig. 2b View FIGURE 2 ). Male right stridulatory area with irregularly pentagonal mirror ( Fig. 2a View FIGURE 2 ). Fore coxae armed with a fine spine. Fore femora armed with 4 small ventro-anterior spines; fore tibiae with 6 ventro-anterior, 6 ventro-posterior and 3 dorso-posterior spines. Mid femora with 3 – 4 small ventro-anterior spines; mid tibiae with 6 ventro-posterior, 6 ventro-anterior and 4 dorso-anterior spines. Hind femora armed with 7 – 8 small ventro-posterior and 9 – 10 ventro-anterior spines, hind tibiae with numerous spines on each margin plus 2 spurs on each dorsal margin. Epiproct covered by tenth abdominal tergum ( Fig. 3a View FIGURE 3 ). Cercus up and in-curved and not exceeding subgenital plate ( Fig. 3c View FIGURE 3 ). Subgenital plate with a long and narrow central “V”-shape cleft in apical half, with conical and obtuse stylus ( Fig. 3d View FIGURE 3 ).
Female ( Fig. 4a – d View FIGURE 4 ): Last tergum split into two broadly triangular pointed lobes, with a sharply angular notch between. Epiproct tongue-shaped, visible. Cercus long, conical, regularly incurved, not branched. Ovipositor slen- der, with slightly enlarged base. Subgenital plate trapezoidal with distinct mid carina and widely triangular notch at apex.
Coloration. Pronotum pale brown; lateral lobes with dark brown dorsal margin, and creamy-brown ventral margin. Tegmina creamy-brown with scattered creamy-white and brown spots. Hind wings brown with lighter fenestration. Fore and middle femora uniformly light brown, hind femur light brown with brown marbled upper edge and a series of brown spots along middle of outer surface. Each tarsus with dark brown ventral surface.
Measurement (mm). Length of body: male 33.5 – 41.9, female 36.6 – 44.8; length of pronotum: male 8.7 – 9.7, female 9.4 – 10.4; length of tegmen: male 27.7 – 29.9, female 29.5 – 32.9; width of tegmen: male 6.4 – 7.6, female 7.0 – 8.5; length of fore femur: male9.2 – 10.2, female 9.8 – 10.7; length of middle femur: male 10.4 – 11.3, female 11.3 – 12.1; length of hind femur: male 26.3 – 30.6, female 29.4 – 31.5; length of ovipositor: 24.9 – 28.4.
Song. The calling song consisted of stereotyped echemes with a regular period ( Fig. 5a – d View FIGURE 5 ). The frequency of main peak is about 10.32 kHz ( Fig. 5d View FIGURE 5 ). Each echeme was comprised of 4 syllable groups ( Fig. 5c View FIGURE 5 ). The important parameters are listed ( Tab. 1 View TABLE 1 ).
Distribution. China, Xinjiang; Kazakhstan; Tajikistan; Turkmenistan.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Tettigoniinae |
Tribe |
Drymadusini |
Genus |
Ceraeocercus fuscipennis
Liu, Fei, Chobanov, Dragan Petrov, Chen, Liusheng & Liu, Chunxiang 2019 |
Ceraeocercus fuscipennis
fuscipennis Uvarov 1910 |