Colletes eous Morice, 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3856.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:76364451-1292-4506-893D-90E626657578 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3507519 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5C4A878E-937B-FFCC-FF22-FA8BFC902473 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Colletes eous Morice, 1904 |
status |
|
Colletes eous Morice, 1904 View in CoL
Colletes eous Morice 1904: 43 View in CoL –44; Noskiewicz 1936: 110; Popov 1952: 83; Ortiz-Sánchez et al. 2004: 12, ♀ (key, Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 c), 19, ♂ (key, Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, 5B); Kuhlmann 2005: 1363; 2009a: 15; Proshchalykin & Kuhlmann 2012: 5, ♀, ♂ ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 e, 7c–d, 15c–d); Kuhlmann & Proshchalykin 2013a: 406 View Cited Treatment .
Colletes cecrops Morice 1904: 44 –45.
Colletes porosicus Strand 1921: 306 –307.
Colletes illyricus Noskiewicz 1936: 120 –123.
Colletes dimidiatus eous: Warncke 1978: 339 View in CoL .
Material examined: China, Xinjiang: 3♂♂, Altay, Talate (88º12′E 47º38′N), 930 m, 13.VIII.1960, Shu-Yong Wang.
Floral association: no record.
General distribution: Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Tunisia, Libya, Hungary, Croatia, Macedonia, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Ukraine, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Iran, India, * China (Xinjiang).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Colletes eous Morice, 1904
Niu, Ze-Qing, Zhu, Chao-Dong & Kuhlmann, Michael 2014 |
Colletes dimidiatus eous:
Warncke 1978: 339 |
Colletes illyricus
Noskiewicz 1936: 120 |
Colletes porosicus
Strand 1921: 306 |
Colletes eous
Kuhlmann 2013: 406 |
Kuhlmann 2005: 1363 |
Ortiz-Sanchez 2004: 12 |
Popov 1952: 83 |
Noskiewicz 1936: 110 |
Morice 1904: 43 |
Colletes cecrops
Morice 1904: 44 |