Karaops markharveyi, Crews, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1150.93760 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A38C5FB6-9F66-4F85-8788-AAA53D21704D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/01C8D958-A493-45B8-9C3F-6F6A83AE44EC |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:01C8D958-A493-45B8-9C3F-6F6A83AE44EC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Karaops markharveyi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Karaops markharveyi sp. nov.
Figs 42D, F View Figure 42 , 43A, B View Figure 43 , 44 A-H View Figure 44 , 45 A, B View Figure 45 , Maps 1 View Map 1 , 8 View Map 8
Material examined.
Holotype: Western Australia • ♀ (reared in captivity); Gibb River Road , ~ 4.6 km from Drysdale River Road , heading east; 16°6'12.69"S, 126°34'44.60"E; ~ 491 m; 22 May 2016; S. Crews, J. DeJong leg.; sandstone outcrop on south side of road; sel_1249; SCC16_050; (WAM T155625) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: ♂ (reared in captivity); same data as previous; sel_1250; (WAM T155626) GoogleMaps • ♀ (reared in captivity); Gibb River Road , heading east; 15°57'37.61"S, 126°52'57.32"E; ~ 410 m; 12 May 2016; S. Crews, J. DeJong leg.; sandstone outcrop on south side of road; sel_1253; SCC16_051; (WAM T155629) • Northern Territory GoogleMaps • ♀, ♂ (reared in captivity); Judbarra National Park, Joe Creek Walk; 15°36'20.63"S, 131°4'45.02"E; 1 Jun. 2016; S. Crews, J. DeJong leg.; under pink sandstone rocks beneath escarpment; sel_1330, 1332; SCC16_070; (MAGNT A004886, A004888) GoogleMaps . Other material examined: Western Australia • 2 imm., same data as holotype; sel_1248, 1251; (WAM T155624, T155627) GoogleMaps • 1 imm.; same data as sel_1253; sel_1251; (WAM T155627) GoogleMaps • ♂ (reared in captivity); same data as previous; sel_1252; (WAM T155628) GoogleMaps • 2♂ (reared in captivity); same data as sel_1330, 1332; sel_1329, 1331; (MAGNT A004885, A004887) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.
Females of Karaops markharveyi sp. nov. are most similar to K. madhawundu sp. nov. and K. mareeba sp. nov. by the large, round accessory bulbs (Figs 44C-F View Figure 44 ; 47D, E View Figure 47 ) but can be differentiated by the much smaller size: females of the new species average 3.58 (n = 3), whereas K. madhawundu sp. nov. have a median size of 7.31 (n = 3) and K. mareeba sp. nov. a median size of 7.63 (n = 2). Additionally, the spermathecae of K. mareeba sp. nov. are directed medially at ~ 45°angle, and the copulatory openings are beneath a lobe (42C, E).
The male palps do not resemble any other known Australian selenopid (Fig. 46A-C, E View Figure 46 ); however, the males are unknown for Karaops madhawundu sp. nov. and K. mareeba sp. nov., the two species that most closely resemble this new species, and molecular data suggest they are closely related to one another (Suppl. material 1). The cymbium has a superficial resemblance to that of K. yumbubaarnji sp. nov. by the chemosensory setae on the tip (Fig. 36A, B View Figure 36 ), and the body size of both species is small, but the other features of the palp are not similar, and the abdominal pattern differs between the two (Figs 34A View Figure 34 , 35A View Figure 35 , 44B View Figure 44 , 45A, B View Figure 45 ).
Description.
Female (holotype). Total length 4.09. Carapace length 1.99, width 2.39. Chelicerae: promargin with three teeth, retromargin with two teeth (1-0-1). Eyes: AER recurved; PER strongly recurved; diameters, AME 0.12, ALE 0.08, PME 0.16, PLE 0.26; interdistances AME-PME 0.04, PME-ALE 0.11, ALE-PLE 0.17, PME-PME 0.72, ALE-ALE 1.01, AME-AME 0.38, PLE-PLE 1.22. Sternum length 0.88, width 1.18. Abdomen length 2.10, width 1.52. Color (in life Figs 43A View Figure 43 , 47A, C View Figure 47 /preserved Figs 42D View Figure 42 , 44H View Figure 44 ): Carapace: reddish brown with two large dark patches behind PLEs extending to middle of carapace next to furrow, some dark patches laterally and posterior to furrow, white setae behind eyes, and in patches on carapace. Chelicerae: yellow-brown, anterior black except medially. Maxillae: yellow, dusky on outer edge. Labium: brownish yellow, pale distally. Sternum: pale yellowish white. Abdomen: dorsally dark brown with orangish spots anterolaterally, mediolaterally, posterolaterally, posteriorly, all but posterior patches with black dot, all orangish areas with tufts of white setae on edges, posterior dark; ventrally yellowish white. Anterior spinnerets: yellowish brown, posterior spinnerets black except ventrally yellowish brown. Legs: yellowish with black marks dorsally and ventrally on Cx I-III, dark mark anteriorly on all Tr,, annulations on all legs, only completely encircle legs at Mt, centers open but dusky on Fm, Pt, and Fm-Pt joint, dark annulations on Ti at Pt-Ti joint and medially, dark annulations on Mt at Ti-Mt joint and at Mt-Ta joint, Ta tips dark; flat, white setae enlarged distally ventrally on all Fm, Pt, Ti, annulation at Pt-Mt joint, tips of Ta dark; spination leg I Fm d 1-1-1, Ti v 2-2-2-2-2, Mt v 2-2-2; leg II Fm d 1-1-1, Ti v 2-2-2-2-2, Mt v 2-2-2; leg III Fm d 1-1-1, Ti v 1-1, Mt v 2-0, 5 pair of small spines near Mt-Ta; leg IV Fm d 1-1-1, rl 0-0-1, rl 0-1-1, Ti v 1-1-1, Mt v 1-1; leg formula 2341; measurements leg I 7.43 (2.41, 0.90, 2.00. 1.23, 0.89); leg II 9.78 (3.82, 0.88, 2.34, 1.64, 1.10); leg III 9.56 (3.40, 0.83, 2.39, 1.18, 1.76); leg IV 8.33 (2.94, 0.60, 2.03, 1.65, 1.11). Palp spination Fm d 0-1-2; 1.84 (0.59, 0.36, 0.27, 0.63); claw with five teeth; dark spots dorsolaterally and ventrally on Fm. Epigyne: EP rounded triangular; MF slightly depressed; LL conspicuous posteriorly, touching; COs laterally in depression. Endogyne: CDs very short; ABs large, round; S oblong; FDs large, directed anterolaterally; small pdf.
Male (paratype). Total length 3.10. Carapace length 1.71, width 2.07. Chelicerae: promargin with three teeth, retromargin with two teeth (1-0-1). Eyes: AER recurved, PER strongly recurved; diameters, AME 0.12, ALE 0.06, PME 0.16, PLE 0.22; interdistances AME-PME 0.02, PME-ALE 0.11, ALE-PLE 0.15, PME-PME 0.63, ALE-ALE 0.88, AME-AME 0.33, PLE-PLE 1.09. Sternum: length 0.89, width 1.16. Abdomen length 1.39, width 1.29. Color (in life Figs 43B View Figure 43 , 44A View Figure 44 , 45A, B View Figure 45 , 48A View Figure 48 /preserved Fig. 44B, G View Figure 44 ): Carapace: reddish brown with two large dark patches originating behind PLEs, extending to middle of carapace next to furrow, some dark patches laterally, posterior to furrow, white setae behind eyes, in patches on carapace/yellow-brown, dark patches visible but dispersed, white setae not as conspicuous. Chelicerae: yellowish, anterior black except basolaterally, setae pale, darkened towards middle. Maxillae: yellowish with black marks anterolaterally. Labium tan, paler distally. Sternum: yellowish white. Abdomen dorsally brownish orange with dark areas medially, laterally, with four dots anteriorly, small patches of white setae at edges of dark medial mark; ventrally whitish gray. Spinnerets: anterior yellowish brown, posterior black except ventrally yellowish brown. Legs: yellowish with black marks anteriorly and posteriorly on Cx, anteriorly on Tr, black bands and spots on Fm, Pt dusky at Fm-Pt joint ventrally, black annulation at Pt-Ti joint, two additional dusky areas, dark annulation on Mt at Ti-Mt joint and at Mt-Ta joint, Ta dark at tip; white setae enlarged distally ventrally on Fm, Pt, Ti; spination leg I Fm d 1-1-1, pr 0-0-1, rl 0-0-1, Ti v 2-2-2-2-2-2, Mt v 2-2-2-2; leg II Fm d 1-1-1, pr 0-0-1, Ti v 2-2-2-2-2-2, Mt v 2-2-2-2; leg III Fm d 1-1-1, Ti v 2-2; leg IV Fm d 1-1-1, Ti v 2-2; leg formula 3241; measurements leg I 7.23 (2.19, 0.73, 1.85, 1.48, 0.98); leg II 8.71 (2.73, 0.79, 2.18, 1.89, 1.12); leg III 9.29 (2.99, 0.82, 2.33, 2.04, 1.11); leg IV 7.97 (2.60, 0.62, 1.84, 1.95, 0.96). Palp: spination Fm d 0-0-1; 1.73 (0.63, 0.22, 0.27, 0.61); dark spot retrolaterally on Fm, retrolaterally and dorsally on Ti, Cy with dark marking basodorsally, apically; dRTA very large, much larger than vRTA, wide, nearly as wide as Ti, pointed at tip, in ventral view, convex medially, plicate distally, vRTA narrow, spoon shaped in ventral view; rbcp smallish; Cy oval in ventral view, laterally, can see indentation along top with patch of chemosensory setae (Fig. 46A, B View Figure 46 ); C large, heavily sclerotized, arced along top, similar to a wave, obscuring ~ 1/2 of E in CS, C covered by TS; E arises from large TL with anterior extension, hook shaped, originating at 7 o’clock, ending at 1 o’clock; MA large, roundish base, with small lobe retrolaterally, tapers only slightly to tip shaped like a bird’s head, heavily sclerotized at base, base covered with Sp.
Variation.
Females (n = 3): In sel_1253, the AME and PME are equal in size, but in sel_1249 and sel_1332, the PME are larger than the AME. Leg III is longest in sel_1253, leg II is longest in sel_1249; however, leg II and leg III are very similar in length. Body length 3.07-4.09. Colors slightly vary, sel_1253 is paler than sel_1249. There is a lot of variability in genitalia - in fact, of the three, none are identical (Figs 44C-F View Figure 44 , 47D, E View Figure 47 ). In sel_1249 the accessory bulbs are very close together, the accessory bulbs are slanted anteriorly from medial to lateral, in sel_1253 the accessory bulbs are much further apart - nearly 3/4 of one accessory bulb diameter. The spermathecae are horizontal. In sel_1249, the copulatory openings are located in a small depression, in sel_1253, there is not much of a depression, and in sel_1332, the depression more conspicuous, uterus externus and pdf quite different, the accessory bulbs are very close together, the spermathecae are horizontal, and the fertilization ducts are of a completely different shape.
Males (n = 4): In sel_1329, the AME=PME, whereas in sel_1250 and sel_1330, the PME are larger than the AME, and there is some variation in leg spination. Body length is 3.10-3.36. sel_1250 is a little paler, more orangey pink, but the pattern the same.
Etymology.
This species is named after Mark S. Harvey, friend, mentor, and person responsible for getting me into the mess of Strayan selenopids. Name in genitive case.
Distribution.
Known from along the Gibb River Road, northeastern Western Australia (Fig. 42F View Figure 42 ), and Judbarra National Park, northwestern Northern Territory (Figs 46F View Figure 46 , 47B View Figure 47 ) (Map 8 View Map 8 ).
Natural history.
The collecting localities for this species occur in the Pentecost subregion of the Central Kimberley, the Mitchell subregion of the Northern Kimberley (but very close to a junction with subregion Pentecost from the Central Kimberley region and the Berkeley subregion of the North Kimberley), and the Victoria Bonaparte bioregion and the Keep subregion. The Pentecost subregion has a dry, hot tropical and sub-humid to semi-arid climate with summer rainfall of 750-1000 mm. The area is a savannah woodland of eucalypts and hummock grasses. These spiders were found under sandstone, and it is suggested that these sandstone communities may be areas of high diversity. There have been no systematic faunal surveys of the area, and ecological and life history data of organisms are missing.
The climate of the Mitchell subregion of the Northern Kimberley bioregion is dry, hot tropical to sub-humid with 1100-1500 mm of mostly summer rain. The area is home to many endemic vertebrates and plants, though little is known about the terrestrial arthropods. Like the Pentecost subregion of the Central Kimberley, it is thought that the sandstone communities may be highly diverse. The Berkeley subregion of the North Kimberley bioregion has a dry, hot tropical sub-humid climate with high summer rainfall ( Graham 2001g).
The third locality is the Keep subregion of the Victoria Bonaparte bioregion. The part of this bioregion in Western Australia is not divided into subregions. In the Northern Territory, this is considered the Keep subregion. Judbarra National Park is in the Victoria Basin and has many sandstone ranges. It has a tropical semi-arid climate with summer monsoons.
All specimens were collected as immatures beneath sandstone rocks during the day or on/under the rocks at dusk in the drier, cooler time of the year. The were reared in captivity, with most maturing in the wetter, hotter time of the year. Although this is a small sampling, the females matured after almost all of the adult males were dead. This could be indicative of many things - in captivity, the molting/feeding/growing does not reflect what happens in nature, there are other males that were not collected that would overlap with the females, in nature the females would live until the following season when males matured, etc. Given what we know from other studies, it is likely that there are adults all year round, and overlaps do occur at different times which is not reflected in the small sample (Suppl. material 2: tables S1, S14).
Discussion.
Given the dissimilarity of the female genitalia of specimens from the three different localities, it was assumed that they were three different species. Therefore, finding corresponding differences in the males was expected. However, there are no differences in the males, including the palps, which have been thoroughly examined and expanded. DNA data indicate that there is no mixing between the three populations, and that they may be related to a species from Timber Creek collected at Nackeroo Lookout (Figs 46D View Figure 46 , 48B View Figure 48 ; Suppl. material 1). Some analyses even render the Judbarra population and the Gibb populations paraphyletic (Suppl. material 1). Because there are no corroborating morphological data, these three populations are currently considered to be the same species, but with more sampling, this is likely to change. These are among the smallest Selenopidae , with the male paratype being the smallest known (3.10 mm).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |