Ibotyporanga ramosae Huber & Brescovit, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.963.2687 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA331360-A678-4233-A7CC-7308EF8B6D7E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14013625 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/552AE709-E87F-FFB8-F7F0-FA55641B878E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ibotyporanga ramosae Huber & Brescovit, 2003 |
status |
|
Ibotyporanga ramosae Huber & Brescovit, 2003 View in CoL
Figs 74 View Fig , 80–83 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Ibotyporanga ramosae Huber & Brescovit, 2003: 19 View in CoL , figs 18–21 (♂).
Diagnosis
Males are distinguished from known congeners by strongly curved main branch of procursus ( Fig. 81A–C View Fig ; more than one entire turn; similar only in I. sertao sp. nov.); from possibly closest relative ( I. imale sp. nov.; according to molecular data, Fig. S2 View Fig ) also by shorter dorsal branch of procursus without bend. Females are externally possibly indistinguishable from putatively close relatives (species with a split procursus but without median sclerite in female internal genitalia: I. imale , I. guanambi sp. nov., I. capivara sp. nov., I. sertao ); I. capivara seems to have longer legs (tibia 1>1.4); I. sertao is distinguished by internal genitalia with distinct pair of convoluted tubes and by absence of large median expandable sac. Females of I. imale and I. guanambi may be morphologically indistinguishable from those of I. ramosae .
Type material
BRAZIL – Bahia • ♂ holotype; São Desiderio, Gruta das Pedras Brilhantes ; 12.418° S, 45.075° W (see Remark below); 8 Jul. 2000; E.F. Ramos leg.; pitfall, caatinga; IBSP 28758 View Materials ; presumably lost – see section ‘On lost types’ above GoogleMaps .
New material examined
BRAZIL – Bahia • 1 ♂, without legs; São Desiderio, near Gruta da Passagem ; 12.4177° S, 45.0743° W; 535 m a.s.l.; 28 Aug. 2016; L.S. Carvalho and B.T. Faleiro leg.; CHNUFPI 3730 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, very damaged; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 3742 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, without legs; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 3728 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀ (epigynum lost after clearing), 3 juvs; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 3748 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, without legs; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 3794 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, without legs; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 4195 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding but inside Gruta da Passagem ; “Carv82”; CHNUFPI 3683 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, without legs; same collection data as for preceding; CHNUFPI 3782 GoogleMaps .
Remark
The coordinates of the type locality given in Huber & Brescovit (2003) are wrong. The exact coordinates are those given above. The specimens newly examined here are from a neighboring cave and its surrounding in the same outcrop, less than 100 m NE of Gruta das Pedras Brilhantes.
Redescription of male (amendments, see Huber & Brescovit 2003)
Measurements of male in CHNUFPI 3730: carapace width 0.72; chelicerae width: 0.30; distance PME– PME 60 µm; diameter PME 70 µm; distance PME–ALE 25 µm; distance AME–AME 15 µm; diameter AME 45 µm; sternum width/ length: 0.47/0.42. Clypeus modified as usual in genus. Sternum with very low humps near coxae 1, not different from those in females. Tibia 1 in male in CHNUFPI 3742: 0.92; with numerous short vertical hairs on tibia 1. Palp as in Fig. 80 View Fig ; palpal femur retrolateral process distinct, not directed towards distal; femur-patella joints not shifted to one side; patella dorsally barely longer than medially wide; tibia-tarsus joints slightly shifted toward retrolateral side; procursus ( Fig. 81A–C View Fig ) main branch subdistally a wide band, one side sclerotized, other side membranous; dorsal branch of procursus much shorter than main branch, slender and weakly curved; genital bulb ( Fig. 81D–F View Fig ) with distinct prolateral sclerite on bulbous part, embolus with slender prolateral ridge.
Description of female
In general, similar to male but slightly darker, carapace also laterally sometimes with darker bands; clypeus unmodified; tibia 1 with few short vertical hairs; tibia 1 length in two females: 1.20, 1.23. Epigynum ( Fig. 83A–B View Fig ) anterior plate trapezoidal, posterior margin almost straight, anteriorly with weakly curved, shallow pocket; posterior plate relatively small. Internal genitalia ( Fig. 83C–F View Fig ) with pair of narrow pore plates laterally on curved membranous arc and very transparent and variably large anterior expandable membranous sac, possibly with lateral compartments or pouches.
Distribution
Known from type locality and neighboring area only, in Bahia, Brazil ( Fig. 74 View Fig ).
Natural history
The spiders were found under rocks of a secondary arboreous caatinga, inside and outside arenitic caves. The region is altered by cattle and grazing, decreasing habitat quality. One egg sac had a diameter of 2.0, was slightly flattened, and contained about 25 embryos.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ibotyporanga ramosae Huber & Brescovit, 2003
Huber, Bernhard A., Meng, Guanliang, Král, Jiří, Ávila Herrera, Ivalú M. & Carvalho, Leonardo S. 2024 |
Ibotyporanga ramosae
Huber B. A. & Brescovit A. D. 2003: 19 |