Ibotyporanga kanoe Huber, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.963.2687 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA331360-A678-4233-A7CC-7308EF8B6D7E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14013619 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/90329555-8348-48B3-8DA3-0897611BE788 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:90329555-8348-48B3-8DA3-0897611BE788 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ibotyporanga kanoe Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ibotyporanga kanoe Huber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:90329555-8348-48B3-8DA3-0897611BE788
Figs 22B View Fig , 60B View Fig , 65–68 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Ibotyporanga Br16-149 View in CoL – Eberle et al. 2018: suppl. file, p. 52 (molecular data). — Huber et al. 2018: 55.
Diagnosis
Males are easily distinguished from most known congeners (except I. naideae and I. diroa ) by long and slender procursus without dorsal branch ( Fig. 66A–C View Fig ); from I. naideae by shorter cheliceral apophysis not directed upwards ( Fig. 67A–B View Fig ) and by details of genital bulb (without strongly developed retrolateral tubercles; tip of embolus without small pointed dorsal apophysis; Fig. 66F View Fig ); from I. diroa also distinguished by presence of prolateral process proximally on procursus (arrow in Fig. 66B View Fig ) and by very short and indistinct (basically absent) prolateral sclerite on bulbous part of genital bulb ( Fig. 66D View Fig ). Females are externally similar to several congeners with relatively long epigynum (similar to I. naideae but relatively shorter) and weakly curved anterior pocket ( Fig. 68A–B View Fig ), but differ by pair of short but distinct tubes in internal genitalia ( Figs 67C View Fig , 68F–G View Fig ) (much longer in I. naideae ).
Etymology
The species name honors the Kanoê, an indigenous people of Brazil that lives in the State of Rondônia; noun in apposition.
Type material
Holotype
BRAZIL – Rondônia • ♂; Floresta Nacional do Jamari , Pedra Grande ; 9.198° S, 63.081° W; 160 m a.s.l.; 25 Oct. 2016; L.S. Carvalho and B.A. Huber leg.; CHNUFPI 3796 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
BRAZIL – Rondônia • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 3752 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, 4 juvs; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 3489 GoogleMaps • 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 3702 , 3731, 3792 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5898 [deposited in ZFMK Ar 24358] GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
BRAZIL – Rondônia • 1 ♂, 1 ♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for holotype; CHNUFPI 5899 [deposited in ZFMK Br16-303; female prosoma and legs used for molecular work] GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 2.3, carapace width 0.97. Distance PME–PME 75 µm; diameter PME 85 µm; distance PME–ALE 30 µm; distance AME–AME 20 µm; diameter AME 55 µm. Leg 1: 6.27 (1.67+0.35 +1.62 +2.03 + 0.60), tibia 2: 1.38, tibia 3: 1.23, tibia 4: 1.73; tibia 1 L/d: 14; diameters of leg femora 0.21–0.22, of leg tibiae 0.12.
COLOUR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs mostly light ochre, carapace medially slightly darker brown, including ocular area and clypeus; legs with very indistinct darker rings on femora (subdistally) and tibiae (proximally and subdistally); abdomen gray with many darker internal marks dorsally and laterally; ventrally with distinct light brown plates in front of gonopore and in front of spinnerets.
BODY. Habitus similar to I. naideae (cf. Fig. 55C View Fig ). Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove. Clypeus with sclerotized rim with median notch. Sternum wider than long (0.68/0.52), with pair of distinct anterior processes near coxae 1. Abdomen globular.
CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 67A–B View Fig ; width 0.39; with strong median frontal apophysis; stridulatory files fine but clearly visible in dissecting microscope.
PALPS. As in Fig. 65 View Fig ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with distinct ventral protrusion; femur proximally with distinct retrolateral process not directed toward distal, with prolateral stridulatory pick, distally widened but unmodified; femur-patella joints and tibia-tarsus joints not shifted toward one side; tibia with distinct ventral process; tarsus without dorsal process; procursus ( Fig. 66A–C View Fig ) proximally wide and with prolateral process, curved towards ventral, distally very long and slender, curved towards dorsal, with narrow but distinct light prolateral band; genital bulb ( Fig. 66D–F View Fig ) with very short and indistinct (practically absent) prolateral sclerite on bulbous part, embolus with distal sclerite directed towards retrolateral.
LEGS. Without spines but with longer hairs ventrally on femora; without curved hairs; with several rows of short vertical hairs on tibiae 1 and 2; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 59%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; tarsus 1 with ~5 pseudosegments, distally fairly distinct.
Variation (male)
Tibia 1 in five males (incl. holotype): 1.60–1.90 (mean 1.76). Largest males also with larger chelicerae and palps, but shapes of genital structures apparently identical. Measurements of largest male: carapace width 1.23; tibia 1 length 1.90; palpal tibia length/diameter: 0.50/0.30 (versus 0.40/ 0.25 in holotype).
Female
In general, similar to male but clypeus unmodified, tibia 1 with few short vertical hairs. Tibia 1 length in five females: 1.83–2.17 (mean 2.02). Epigynum ( Fig. 68A–B View Fig ) anterior plate trapezoidal, posterior margin slightly and evenly indented, anteriorly with wide and shallow pocket; posterior plate large but simple, rectangular. Internal genitalia ( Figs 67C View Fig , 68C–G View Fig ) with heavily sclerotized median structure, with pair of relatively large, weakly sclerotized pore plates, and pair of short ducts originating laterally from membranous anterior structure and leading into widened terminal sacs.
Distribution
Known from type locality only, in Brazil, Rondônia ( Fig. 60B View Fig ).
Natural history
The type locality is located within the Floresta Nacional do Jamari, a sustainable use conservation unit, with about 223 000 hectares of dense Amazon rainforest. About 43% of its area is used for log extraction and cassiterite mining activities (https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/servico-florestal-brasileiro/ concessao-florestal/concessoes-florestais-em-andamento-1/floresta-nacional-do-jamari-ro). The sampling in this conservation unit was performed at six sites ( Fig. S8A View Fig ), but Ibotyporanga was only found on a granite rock outcrop, which is dominated by exposed rock and scattered low vegetation adapted to drier conditions ( Figs 22B and S View Fig 9A–B View Fig ). In the surrounding forest, we found several genera of Pholcidae usually encountered in humid Brazilian forests ( Metagonia , Mesabolivar , Litoporus ), but no Ninetinae . On the outcrop, Ibotyporanga was found by turning rocks. Upon turning the rocks, the spiders ran rapidly, making them difficult to catch.
The conservation status of this species should be formally assessed. From satellite images ( Fig. S8 View Fig ), we estimate its extent of occurrence (EOO) to be about 0.13 km ², i.e., the rock outcrop area. The sampling site is less than 100 meters from a mining site (Taboquinha) inside the conservation unit ( Fig. S9B View Fig ). The mining activities are active and currently under expansion, getting closer to the rock outcrop ( Fig. S9 View Fig ). This dynamic potentially decreases habitat quality, threatening Ibotyporanga kanoe sp. nov. to extinction.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ibotyporanga kanoe Huber
Huber, Bernhard A., Meng, Guanliang, Král, Jiří, Ávila Herrera, Ivalú M. & Carvalho, Leonardo S. 2024 |
Ibotyporanga Br16-149
Eberle J. & Dimitrov D. & Valdez-Mondragon A. & Huber B. A. 2018: 52 |
Huber B. A. & Eberle J. & Dimitrov D. 2018: 55 |