Ibotyporanga bariro Huber, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.963.2687 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA331360-A678-4233-A7CC-7308EF8B6D7E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13963148 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/552AE709-E80F-FFCB-F45A-FAB7649486FA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ibotyporanga bariro Huber, 2020 |
status |
|
Ibotyporanga bariro Huber, 2020 View in CoL
Figs 26 View Fig , 32C–D View Fig , 36D View Fig , 37 View Fig
Ibotyporanga bariro Huber View in CoL in Huber & Villarreal, 2020: 62 View Cited Treatment , figs 176–177, 189–196, 1031, 1040 (♂ ♀).
Remarks
We have no new material of this Venezuelan species but include it here to provide an updated diagnosis, comparing it with the very similar Colombian I. walekeru sp. nov. and other similar species. In the original description, the carapace width of the holotype was erroneously given as 0.95; the correct measure is 0.75.
Diagnosis
Males are easily distinguished from most known congeners by shape of procursus ( Fig. 37A–C View Fig ; short and wide, curved towards dorsal, without dorsal branch, distally with wide transparent membrane); from the very similar I. walekeru sp. nov. by presence of many large fringes distally on procursus (only a few hair-like processes in I. walekeru ; compare Fig. 32A–B View Fig with Fig. 32 C–D View Fig ); from the superficially similar I. itatim sp. nov. by much shorter legs (male tibia 1 <1.1; in I. itatim >1.5), and by absence of dorsal process on palpal tarsus. Females externally possibly indistinguishable from I. walekeru , but internal genitalia with very short and indistinct pair of tubes ( Fig. 36D View Fig ; long and distinct in I. walekeru ); I. piojo sp. nov. with more strongly curved epigynal pocket and with distinct internal tubes; I. itatim with deeper triangular epigynal pocket and distinct pair of internal lateral sacs.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ibotyporanga bariro Huber, 2020
Huber, Bernhard A., Meng, Guanliang, Král, Jiří, Ávila Herrera, Ivalú M. & Carvalho, Leonardo S. 2024 |
Ibotyporanga bariro
Huber 2020 |