Filistata betarif, Magalhaes & Aharon & Ganem & Gavish-Regev, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.831.1875 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C82D605B-9BE0-47D1-89E3-8C978CA48B4D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6928202 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/86B4AAD0-D69E-4C79-BF3F-DE5E7DC0EDB1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:86B4AAD0-D69E-4C79-BF3F-DE5E7DC0EDB1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Filistata betarif |
status |
sp. nov. |
Filistata betarif sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:86B4AAD0-D69E-4C79-BF3F-DE5E7DC0EDB1
Figs 1 View Fig , 3E–F, H View Fig , 5A, C, E View Fig , 7–9 View Fig View Fig View Fig
Filistata View in CoL IFMsp142 – Magalhaes & Ramírez in press: 11, 13, 16.
Diagnosis
Males are similar to those of F. insidiatrix and F. albens by having a pedipalp with elongate femur and tibia, and by a subconical copulatory bulb with terminally hooked embolus ( Fig. 8A–B View Fig ; see also Zonstein & Marusik 2019: fig. 27). They differ from both species by the conspicuous embolic keel ( Fig. 8F View Fig (arrow), 5A, k) (inconspicuous keel in F. insidiatrix and F. albens ; Figs 5B View Fig , 10O View Fig ). Females have a pair of large spermathecae that appear undivided ( Fig. 9 View Fig ); they fall within the morphological variation observed for F. insidiatrix ( Fig. 3C–D View Fig ; Zonstein & Marusik 2019: fig. 17d–h) and thus females are not diagnosable through morphology only; they can be diagnosed using DNA barcoding of the COI gene.
Etymology
The specific epithet is a noun in apposition and refers to Bet ‘Arif, the name of the ‘ wadi ’ (dry riverbed) in which the two caves where the species was collected (Tinshemet and Oah) are located.
Type material examined
Holotype ISRAEL • 1 ♂; Judean hills , near Shoham, Hadom Shomeron Nature Reserve ; Bet ‘Arif wadi , Tinshemet cave , inside cave ; 31.99938° N, 34.96813° E; 122 m. a.s.l.; 20 Feb. 2020; I.L.F. Magalhaes, E. Gavish- Regev and S. Aharon leg.; HUJ-INVAr 21058 . GoogleMaps
Paratypes ISRAEL • 1 ♀; Judean hills , near Shoham, Hadom Shomeron Nature Reserve ; Bet ‘Arif wadi , Oah cave , inside cave ; 32.0053° N, 34.9722° E; 25 May 2014; S. Aharon and E. Gavish-Regev leg.; HUJ-INVAr 21055 GoogleMaps • 2 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; 9 Mar. 2014; S. Aharon and E. Gavish-Regev leg.; HUJ- INVAr 21059 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 6 ♀♀; Judean hills , near Shoham, Hadom Shomeron Nature Reserve , Bet ‘Arif wadi , Tinshemet cave , inside cave ; 31.99938° N, 34.96813° E, 122 m. a.s.l.; 20 Feb. 2020; I.L.F. Magalhaes, E. Gavish-Regev and S. Aharon leg.; MACN-Ar 41222 GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 2 imm.; same collection data as for preceding; HUJ-INVAr 20275 GoogleMaps • 4 ♀♀, 1 imm.; same collection data as for preceding; MACN-Ar 41791 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; MACN-Ar 41793 GoogleMaps • 2 imm.; same locality as for preceding, Mediterranean scrubland , outside the cave, under stones; 20 Feb. 2020; I.L.F. Magalhaes, E. Gavish-Regev and S. Aharon leg.; MACN-Ar 41829 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same locality as for preceding; Mediterranean scrubland , outside the cave; 31.9994° N, 34.9681° E; 25 May 2014; S. Aharon and E. Gavish-Regev leg.; HUJ-INVAr 21056 GoogleMaps • 7 ♀♀; same locality as for preceding; inside cave; 31.99938° N, 34.96813° E; 25 May 2014; S. Aharon and E. Gavish-Regev leg.; HUJ-INVAr 20301 GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; HUJ-INVAr 21057 GoogleMaps • 3 imm; same locality as for preceding; 9 Mar. 2014; S. Aharon and E. Gavish-Regev leg.; HUJ-INVAr 21060 GoogleMaps .
Additional material examined
None.
Description
Male (holotype, HUJ-INVAr 21058)
Coloration yellowish cream except where noted. Carapace lined with black pigment, with marbled brown clypeal markings and brown, V-shaped median pattern. Legs I–III with three brown ventral spots. Abdomen brownish gray. Anterior margin of the carapace unmodified, eye apodemes absent. Sternum subrounded, sigilla not visible. Total length 5.25. Carapace length 2.38, width 1.88. Clypeus length 0.28. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.14, PME 0.15, ALE 0.20, PLE 0.18, AME–AME 0.06, PME– PME 0.14. Sternum length 1.26, width 1.05. Pedipalp: femur length 2.34, height 0.30, tibia length 2.10, height 0.34. Leg I: 14.88 (3.82, 1.09, 3.94, 3.91, 2.12). II: 11.29 (3.05, 0.94, 2.78, 3.17, 1.35). III: 10.23 (2.70, 0.84, 2.52, 2.91, 1.26). IV: 12.52 (3.57, 0.90, 3.28, 3.44, 1.33). Abdomen: length 2.97, width 1.72. Pedipalp macrosetae on ventral surface of femur. Leg macrosetae: fe I d1-0-0, dp0-0-2, ti I v0-2-2-2, mt I v2-2-2-4, fe II d1-1-0, dp0-0-2, ti II v0-2-2, mt II v2-2-4, fe III d1-0-0, dp0-0-1, dr0-0-2, ti III d1-2-2, v1-1, mt III dr0-0-1, v1-2-2-4, fe IV d1-1-0, dr0-0-2, ti IV v1-1, mt IV v1-1-2-4, all tarsi with ventral macrosetae. Pedipalp as in diagnosis ( Figs 5A, C, E View Fig , 8A–G View Fig ). State of the specimen: good, right leg I removed for molecular analysis, left pedipalp dissected.
Female (paratype, MACN-Ar 41222)
Coloration as in male. Eye apodemes absent. Sternum subrounded, with one pair of posterior sigilla. Total length 7.76. Carapace length 3.17, width 2.51. Clypeus length 0.40. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.14, PME 0.19, ALE 0.27, PLE 0.23, AME–AME 0.04, PME–PME 0.23. Sternum length 1.64, width 1.50. Pedipalp: femur length 1.70, height 0.67, tibia length 1.06, height 0.65. Leg I: 13.60 (3.66, 1.37, 3.49, 3.23, 1.85). II: 9.66 (2.84, 1.13, 2.26, 2.16, 1.27). III: 7.82 (2.34, 1.03, 1.66, 1.64, 1.15). IV: 10.54 (3.30, 1.25, 2.64, 2.27, 1.08). Abdomen: length 4.67, width 3.08. Palpal macrosetae on ventral surface of tibia and tarsus. Leg macrosetae: fe I d1-0-0, ti I v0-2-0, mt I v2-2-2-4, fe II d1-0-0, ti II v0- 2-0, mt II v2-2-2-4, fe III d1-0-0, ti III d0-2-0, v0-1-2, mt III dr1-1-1, v1-2-2-4, fe IV d1-0-0, ti IV v1-1, mt IV v1-1-1-4, all tarsi with ventral macrosetae. Calamistrum with three staggered rows with <6 setae; calamistrum gap present. Epigastric furrow unmodified. Endogyne of females from the same locality as in the diagnosis ( Fig. 9 View Fig ). State of the specimen: good.
Variation
Males (N = 3): total length 4.89–5.67 (5.27), carapace length 2.25–2.78 (2.47), femur I length 3.62–4.04 (3.83), femur/carapace ratio 1.45–1.61 (1.56). Females (N = 5): total length 6.47–8.95 (7.79), carapace length 3.17–3.98 (3.57), femur I length 3.5–4.18 (3.86), femur/carapace ratio 1.01–1.15 (1.08). The shape of the spermathecae varies only slightly among the dissected females.
Natural history
Filistata betarif sp. nov. is a troglophilic species, inhabiting both epigean and hypogean (caves) habitats. It is known from the mesic Mediterranean region of Israel, in scrubland habitats, and usually hides in a refugium made of cribellate silk in crevices, holes or under stones and on rocky walls ( Fig. 1A–B View Fig ). All specimens were collected from Bet ‘Arif wadi near Shoham, Hadom Shomeron Nature Reserve, central Israel. The species was found in low abundances outside of caves ( Fig. 1D View Fig ) and in very high abundances, year-around, in Tinshemet cave that is characterized by a high guano amount of the Egyptian fruit bat [ Rousettus aegyptiacus (Geoffroy, 1810) ]. Tinshemet (Arabic name: Mugharet al-Watwat) is a small to medium-sized Paleolithic cave, formed in a limestone rock of the Turonian Bina formation. It is located on the east bank of Bet ‘Arif wadi (Arabic name: Wadi Adasiyeh), 95 meters a.s.l. and 15 meters above the wadi ( Frumkin et al. 2016). It has a main opening on the side of the cliff, and an additional chimney opening, which the frugivorous bats frequently use (personal observation). Filistata betarif sp. nov. was also found in lower abundances in the nearby Oah cave that houses no bats ( Cuff et al. 2021; Gavish- Regev et al. 2021). Oah is a small cave, situated on the same east bank of Bet ‘Arif wadi, north to Tinshemet cave, and is formed in a similar rock and age (Boaz Langford, pers. comm.).
In both caves, Filistata betarif sp. nov. was found mainly at the entrance zones, on the cave walls ( Fig. 1A–B View Fig ). Other caves surveyed by us, at the mesic Mediterranean, semi-arid, and arid regions of Israel and Palestine, were not found to be occupied by F. betarif sp. nov., but instead by its sibling troglophilic species F. insidiatrix [Berniki, Yir’on, Yonim (Galilee); Ezba’, Oren (Karmel); Sal’it (northern Samaria); Andartat HaBiqa’ (central Jordan Valley); Perat (northern Judean desert); Qumeran (northern Dead-Sea area)] ( Cuff et al. 2021; Gavish-Regev et al. 2021).
Distribution
Known only from two caves and under stones in their surroundings in Bet ‘Arif wadi, Hadom Shomeron Nature Reserve, central Israel ( Fig. 4 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Filistata betarif
Magalhaes, Ivan L. F., Aharon, Shlomi, Ganem, Zeana & Gavish-Regev, Efrat 2022 |
Filistata
Latreille 1810 |