Metrodora rana, Bolivar, 1887
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5597.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E8B87293-0CCD-469D-9F2F-17F1AB4919BF |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/542B87FD-FFAC-040F-9FDE-C3C0FA5FF974 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2025-03-04 12:56:25, last updated 2025-03-04 13:25:28) |
scientific name |
Metrodora rana |
status |
|
Metrodora rana View in CoL Bolívar, 1887
( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , Map 1 and 2)
Metrodora rana View in CoL Bolívar, 1887: 248. Holotype: male, PERU, Alto View in CoL Amazonas. Depository: MNCN.
Remarks. M. rana is only known from the holotype male ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). However, Giglio-Tos (1898) recorded a female from the Santiago Valley ( Ecuador). The author mentioned that it has a more pronounced medial carina of the vertex and denticulations on the middle femur, which suggests, according to what has been studied here, it could be another species of one of the other genera delimited here and not a conspecific female of M. rana . Hebard (1924a, b) recorded a female from Bucay, Guayas ( Ecuador), which he compared with Tylotettix simplex Hebard, 1924 , although Hebard was not wholly sure of the affiliation of his specimen. Günther (1939) recorded two females from Peru in the Stettin Museum. Buzzetti & Devriese (2007) reported a female collected at Yasuni Scientific Station but suggested that it was closely related to Morseidora acuta ( Günther, 1939) , comb. nov. So again, it most likely is not a conspecific female. When observing this panorama of the historical records of the species, perhaps only those provided by Günther (1939) could be conspecific females, so it was urgent to define the genus Metrodora and its type species, which was selected as a lectotype by Paris (1994). Based on this specimen, the redescription that applies to the genus and species is provided to understand the morphology of this taxon and obtain better identifications when additional specimens are found.
The type specimen of M. rana does not have antennae, so they must most likely be filiform not reaching the humeral angles, and with 14–15 antennal segments, like related taxa. Furthermore, the type specimen is designated under number 140 of the MNCN catalog ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ), but the right front leg and the left middle leg are missing ( Paris 1994) .
MAP 1. Distribution of Metrodorini ( Metrodorina stat. nov. and Miriatrina stat. nov.) and Metopomystrini trib. nov. species.
Genus Tylotettix Morse, 1900 , stat. resurr.
Tylotettix Morse, 1900: 6 View in CoL .
Metrodora View in CoL (partim): Günther, 1939: 292.
Type species: Tylotettix sinuata Morse, 1900 , by original monotypy.
Redescription. Body granulated and robust ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Head little exserted ( Figs. 2C View FIGURE 2 , 3B View FIGURE 3 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ). In frontal view: vertex twice as wide as an eye; medial carinae 1.5 to 2 times longer than the lateral ones; frontal costa bifurcation located at the middle of the eyes; scutellum wide; fascial carinae prominent and curved, ramification of fascial carinae angled; upper margin of the antennal grooves at the level of the lower margin of the eyes; lateral ocelli placed between the inferior area of the eyes, near the base from where each branch of the fascial carinae diverges; medial ocellus located close to the lower portion of the scutellum; antennae situated below the eyes, and with 15 segments (antennae only known to T. simplex comb. nov.); palpi narrow, the apical segments moderately depressed ( Figs. 2E View FIGURE 2 , 3C View FIGURE 3 , 4C View FIGURE 4 ). In lateral view: carinae of the vertex prominent and protruding between the eyes; fastigio-fascial angle convex in front and deeply at its upper margin where the carinae converge to connect with the medial carina; fascial carinae rounded and emerging between the antennae, slightly sinuate above and below; eyes subglobose, with rounded dorsal surface and almost straight ventral margin not elevated higher than vertex ( Figs. 2C View FIGURE 2 , 3B View FIGURE 3 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Thorax. Pronotum not surpassing the tip of hind femora. Pronotal disc with tectiform surface and median carina cristate arched anteriorly, nearly straight posteriorly, and rounded apically in dorsal and lateral views. Lateral carinae sinuate in dorsal and lateral views; humeral angles concave; angles of the lateral lobes moderately outward and not acute; infrascapular area with medium width, ending at the level of the fourth to sixth abdominal segments; lateral area poorly developed ( Figs. 2A View FIGURE 2 , 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Wings absent. Legs stout and slightly elongated. Fore and mid-femora compressed, undulated, or with mid-sized lobes. Hind femora with ante-genicular tooth moderately developed; genicular tooth triangular and with apex rounded. Hind tibia scarcely ampliated near the apex; first and third segments of the hind tarsi equal in length ( Figs. 2C View FIGURE 2 , 3B View FIGURE 3 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ). Abdomen. Last segments moderately constricted; cerci conical; penultimate sternite long, two times longer than the subgenital plate, almost straight; subgenital plate short, cupuliform, upcurved, and apex rounded.
MAP 2. Distribution of Metrodorini ( Metrodorina stat. nov. and Miriatrina stat. nov.) and Metopomystrini trib. nov. species. Detail of north of South America.
Female. Similar to male, differing in the somewhat larger size, slightly more robust body, and slightly wider vertex. Pronotal disc somewhat more rugose and more elevated. Ovipositor valves conspicuously serrulated, and subgenital plate covering the first basal third of the lower valves.
Species included. Tylotettix sinuata Morse, 1900 , comb. resurr., T. simplex Hebard, 1924 , comb. resurr., and T. pygmaea Roberts, 1937 , comb. ressur.
Distribution. Northern South America ( Venezuela), extending through Central America from Panama to Nicaragua (Maps 1 and 4).
Remarks. Originally this genus included only the type species from Nicaragua ( Morse 1900) and was alocated in the group Cladonotae (=subfamily Cladonotinae ) ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Later, additional species were added by Hebard (1924a) and Roberts (1937) from Panama ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ) and Venezuela ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ), respectively. Günther (1939) synonymizes Tylotettix under Metrodora by comparing it with some characters that are now part of the general diagnosis of the tribe Metrodorini . Therefore, Tylotettix stat. resurr. is revalidated and differentiated from Metrodora and nearby genera by the characters provided in the Metrodorina stat. nov. genera key.
The three species originally described in this genus have their original combination restored. In the species descriptions, the authors mention that they do not have a scapular area, but this is not the case ( Roberts 1937). This structure of the pronotum is present in all three species. Possibly, the authors were referring to the lateral area, which is absent or poorly developed in the species of this genus. A key to identifying species in the genus is provided below.
Key to species of Tylotettix View in CoL
1. Pronotum relatively longer, extending to near or slightly beyond the apices of the hind femora, with an apex rather acute ( Figs. 2A, C View FIGURE 2 ). Median carina of pronotum cristate moderately elevated from the anterior margin to the first third of the disc, then subelevated ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 )................................................................ T. simplex View in CoL stat. resurr.
- Pronotum extending just beyond the terminalia, barely reaching the proximal portion of the genicular lobes of the hind femora and with a rounded apex. Median carinae of the pronotal disc cristate, progressively curving from the anterior to the posterior margin ( Figs. 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ).................................................................................. 2
2. Scutellum three times wider than scape ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ), medial carina of the vertex curved forward ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3 )................................................................................................... T. sinuata View in CoL stat. resurr.
- Scutellum two times wider than scape ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ), medial carina of the vertex slightly upcurved ( Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 )................................................................................................. T. pygmaea stat. resurr.
Genus Platytettix Hancock, 1906 View in CoL , stat. resurr.
Platytettix Hancock, 1906: 88 View in CoL .
Metrodora View in CoL (partim): Günther, 1939: 292.
Type species: Platytettix reticulatus Hancock, 1906 , by original monotypy.
Redescription. Body small, robust, and strongly rugose ( Figs. 6 View FIGURE 6 , 9 View FIGURE 9 , 12 View FIGURE 12 ). Head slightly exserted. In frontal view: vertex considerably broader than an eye, two or three times wider; medial and lateral carinae almost similar in length (in some species, the medial carina is longer than the lateral carinae); frontal costa bifurcation located at the middle of the eyes; scutellum wide, fascial carinae prominent and curved; antennae situated below the lower margin of the eyes, in the middle length of each branch of the fascial carinae and with 14–15 segments; lateral ocelli located between the eyes near the base from where each branch of the fascial carinae diverges; medial ocellus located on the lower portion of the scutellum; palpi narrow, with the three apical segments moderately depressed ( Figs. 7A View FIGURE 7 , 10A View FIGURE 10 , 16A View FIGURE 16 ). In lateral view: carinae of the vertex low, short and do not protruding between the eyes; fastigio-fascial angle rounded; fascial carinae rounded and produced between the antennae, abruptly sinuate above and below; eyes subglobose, with rounded dorsal surface and almost straight ventral margin and very slightly elevated above the vertex ( Figs. 7B View FIGURE 7 , 10B View FIGURE 10 , 16B View FIGURE 16 ). Thorax. Pronotum robust, not surpassing the tip of hind femora or ending near it. Pronotal disc anteriorly straight and posterior apex pointed; median carina elevated, forming a hump that rises conspicuously and occupies the anterior half of the pronotal disc ( Figs. 10B View FIGURE 10 , 12A View FIGURE 12 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Humeral angles little developed; angles of the lateral lobes flattened and projected to the sides, triangularly sub-spiniformproduced ( Figs. 12B View FIGURE 12 , 16C View FIGURE 16 ), obliquely truncate behind and denticulated ( Figs. 7C View FIGURE 7 , 10B View FIGURE 10 ); infra-scapular area wide and extending to seventh or eighth abdominal segment; lateral area originating from the upper half of the infrascapular area with same width from the base to the apex in lateral view ( Figs. 6A View FIGURE 6 , 9A View FIGURE 9 , 10D, 10E View FIGURE 10 ). Wings absent. Legs stout and a slightly elongated. Fore and mid-femora compressed, dorsal and ventral margins conspicuously wavy, forming small projections ( Figs. 7D, 7E View FIGURE 7 ). Hind femora with ante-genicular tooth well-developed (except P. uniformis comb. rev. ( Figs. 5A View FIGURE 5 , 6A View FIGURE 6 )), and genicular tooth triangular with apex acute ( Figs. 12A View FIGURE 12 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Hind tibia scarcely ampliated near the apex; first and third segments of the hind tarsi equal in length. Abdomen. Last segments moderately constricted; cerci conical and reduced ( Figs. 8A View FIGURE 8 , 11A View FIGURE 11 , 16F View FIGURE 16 ); penultimate sternite mid-sized, 1.5 times longer than subgenital plate, and almost straight ( Figs. 8B View FIGURE 8 , 11B View FIGURE 11 , 16G View FIGURE 16 ); subgenital plate short, cupuliform, upcurved, and apex rounded ( Figs. 8D View FIGURE 8 , 16G View FIGURE 16 ).
Female. Similar to male, differing in the somewhat larger size, slightly more robust body ( Figs. 12 View FIGURE 12 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 17 View FIGURE 17 ), and slightly wider vertex ( Figs. 14C View FIGURE 14 , 20B View FIGURE 20 ). Pronotal disc a little more rugose and slightly more elevated median carina. Ovipositor valves with moderated serrations ( Figs. 18D View FIGURE 18 , 22G View FIGURE 22 ), subgenital plate covering the first basal third of the lower valve or not ( Figs. 18E View FIGURE 18 , 22H View FIGURE 22 ).
Species included. Platytettix reticulatus Hancock, 1906 , comb. resurr., P. gibbosulus ( Walker, 1871) , comb. nov., P. arcuatus Bruner, 1920 , comb. resurr., P. gibbinotus Bruner, 1910 , comb. resurr., P. uniformis Bruner, 1910 , comb. resurr., P. pilosus Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares , sp. nov.
Distribution. Amazon between Peru , Colombia, Brazil, and French Guiana (Maps 1 and 2).
Remarks. Hancock (1906) described the genus with one species, placing it in the section Metrodorae (=subfamily Metrodorinae ). Later, Bruner (1910, 1920) included the other three species in Platytettix . Then, Günther (1939) synonymized Platytettix under Metrodora in the same way as Tylotettix .
Much later, Cadena-Castañeda et al. (2020) synonymized P. reticulatus under Amorphopus gibbosulus Walker, 1871 , and, in turn, located this species within Metrodora . Here, we restore P. reticulatus comb. resurr. as a valid species, so its original combination is revalidated. Likewise, A. gibbosulus (= P. gibbosulus comb. nov.) remains a valid species, which is similar to P. arcuatus comb. resurr., grouping six species within this genus. When comparing with the species of Metrodora s. l., it is evident that Platytettix stat. resurr. must be revalidated, redefined, and differentiated from Metrodora and nearby genera by the characters provided in the key to Metrodorina stat. nov. genera. Platytettix stat. resurr. and Metrodora s. str. are the only genera of this subtribe that do not have the medial carina of the vertex projecting conspicuously into the middle of the eyes.
Key to species of Platytettix View in CoL
1. Hump of median carina of pronotum moderately elevated ( Figs. 5A View FIGURE 5 , 6A View FIGURE 6 ); in lateral view, from the humero-apical carina to the highest edge of the hump, rising as high as half the length of the fore-femur ( Figs. 5B View FIGURE 5 , 7B View FIGURE 7 ). Hind femora with genicular and ante-genicular tooth poorly developed ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 )........................................ P. uniformis View in CoL comb. resurr.
- Hump of the median carina of the pronotum noticeably elevated; in lateral view, from the humero-apical carina to the highest edge of the hump, rising as high as the length of the fore femur or more ( Figs. 12A View FIGURE 12 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 16B View FIGURE 16 , 18A View FIGURE 18 ). Hind femora with genicular and antegenicular tooth generally well-developed ( Figs. 12A View FIGURE 12 , 19 View FIGURE 19 , 21A View FIGURE 21 )................................... 2
2. Surface of the pronotum covered by abundant bristles ( Figs. 9 View FIGURE 9 , 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Antegenicular tooth, moderately developed ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ).......................................................................................... P. pilosus sp. nov.
- Body surface generally without bristles ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 , 14 View FIGURE 14 , 16 View FIGURE 16 , 21 View FIGURE 21 ). Antegenicular tooth well-developed ( Figs. 12A View FIGURE 12 , 19 View FIGURE 19 , 21A View FIGURE 21 )..... 3
3. Pronotal hump rounded, curved backward and more conspicuous than in other species; in lateral view, from the humero-apical carina to the highest edge of the hump, rising as high as twice the length of the fore-femur or more ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ). Lower margin of lateral lobes of pronotum greatly produced ( Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 )................................ P. reticulatus View in CoL comb. resurr.
- Pronotal hump subquadrangular and curving slightly backward; in the lateral view, from the humero-apical carina to the highest edge of the hump, rising as high as 1.0 or 1.5 times the fore-femur length ( Figs. 13A View FIGURE 13 , 14A View FIGURE 14 , 16B View FIGURE 16 , 18A View FIGURE 18 ). Lower margin of lateral lobes of pronotum generally angulate pointed ( Figs. 16C View FIGURE 16 , 18B View FIGURE 18 , 22C View FIGURE 22 )............................................. 4
4. Mid-sized (8–9 mm.) ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ). Dorsal margin of the median carina hump rounded ( Figs. 13A, B View FIGURE 13 ). Mid femur with one small ventral projection............................................................... P. gibbinotus View in CoL comb. resurr.
- Small-sized (6–7 mm.). Dorsal margin of median carina hump almost straight ( Figs. 16B View FIGURE 16 , 18A View FIGURE 18 , 19B View FIGURE 19 ). Mid femur with at least three ventral projections................................................................................ 5
5. Coloration brown with ocher sections, without conspicuous stripes on the anterior margin of the pronotum ( Figs. 14A View FIGURE 14 , 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Pronotum apex straight in lateral view ( Fig. 14B View FIGURE 14 , 15B View FIGURE 15 ). Subgenital plate covering much of the lower valves of the ovipositor................................................................................ P. arcuatus View in CoL comb. resurr.
- Coloration reddish-brown or dark brown, with a conspicuous yellow stripe “like a necklace” running along the anterior margin of the pronotal disc and the lateral lobes ( Figs. 18 View FIGURE 18 , 21 View FIGURE 21 ). Pronotum apex “truncated” and slightly rising in lateral view ( Fig. 19A View FIGURE 19 ). Subgenital plate of the female not noticeably covering the base of the lower valves of the ovipositor ( Fig. 22G View FIGURE 22 )........................................................................................... P. gibbosulus View in CoL comb. nov.
Bolivar, I. (1887) Essai sur les Acridiens de la tribu des Tettigidae. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique, 31, 175-313.
Bruner, L. (1910) South American Tetrigidae. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 7, 89-143. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.29701
Bruner, L. (1920) Saltatorial Orthoptera from South America and the Isle of Pines. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 13, 5-91. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.15649
Buzzetti, F. M. & Devriese, H. (2007) Tetrigidae from Ecuador (Orthoptera Caelifera Tetrigoidea). Atti della Accademia Roveretana degli Agiati, 8 B 7, 41-54.
Cadena-Castaneda, O. J., Silva, D. S. M., Mello Mendes, D. M., Pereira, M. R., De Domenico, F. C. & Sperber, C. F. (2020) Review of the tribe Amorphopini (Orthoptera: Tetrigidae: Metrodorinae): Pygmy moss-lichen tetrigids from the Amazon rainforest. Journal of Orthoptera Research, 29 (1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.29.33717
Giglio-Tos, E. (1898) Viaggio del Dr. Enrico Festa nella Republica dell'Ecuador et regioni vicine. VI. Ortotteri. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia comparata della Royal Universita di Torino, 13 (311), 1-108. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.16811
Gunther, K. (1939) Revision der Acrydiinae (Orthoptera), III. Sectio Amorphopi (Metrodorae Bol. 1887, aut.). Abhandlungen und Berichte aus den Staatlichen Museen fur Tierkunde und Volkerkunde in Dresden, Series A: Zoology, N. F., 20 (NF Bd. 1), 16-335.
Hancock, J. L. (1906) Description of new genera and species of the orthopterous tribe Tettigidae. Entomological News, 17, 86-91.
Hebard, M. (1924 a) Studies in the Acrididae of Panama (Orth.). Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 50 (2), 75-140.
Morse, A. P. (1900) Orthoptera. The Acrididae. Subfamily Tettiginae. Biologia Centrali-Americana, 2, 3-9.
Paris, M. (1994) Catalogo de tipos de ortopteroides (Insecta) de Ignacio Bolivar, I: Blattaria, Mantodea, Phasmoptera y Orthoptera (Stenopelmatoidea, Rhaphidophoroidea, Tettigonioidea, Grylloidea, Tetrigoidea). Eos, Revista espanola de Entomologia, 69, 143-264.
Roberts, H. R. (1937) Studies on the family Acrididae (Orthoptera) of Venezuela. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 89, 343-368
Walker, F. (1871) Catalogue of the Specimens of Dermaptera Saltatoria in the Collection of the British Museum, London, 5, 811-850.
FIGURE 1. Metrodora rana Bolívar, 1887. Male holotype. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Labels. C. Habitus in dorsal view. D. Frons. E. Head and pronotum in dorsal view. Photos: M. París (MNCN).
FIGURE 2. Tylotettix simplex Hebard, 1924 comb. rev. Male holotype. A, C. Habitus in lateral views. B. Labels. D. Head and pronotum in lateral view after Hebard (1924). E. Frons.
FIGURE 3. Tylotettix sinuata Morse, 1900 comb. rev. Male holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral views. C. Frons. D. labels.
FIGURE 4. Tylotettix pygmaea Roberts, 1937 comb. rev. Female holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral view. C. Frons. D. labels.
FIGURE 5. Platytettix uniformis Bruner, 1910 comb. rev. Female lectotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral view. C. Frons. D. labels.
FIGURE 6. Platytettix uniformis Bruner, 1910 comb. rev. Male habitus A. Lateral and B. Dorsal views.
FIGURE 7. Platytettix uniformis Bruner, 1910 comb. rev. Male. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur.
FIGURE 8. Platytettix uniformis Bruner, 1910 comb. rev. Male terminalia. A. Dorsal. B. Lateral. C. Axial D. ventral views.
FIGURE 9. Platytettix pilosus Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male habitus A. Lateral and B. Dorsal views.
FIGURE 10. Platytettix pilosus Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur.
FIGURE 11. Platytettix pilosus Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male terminalia. A. Dorsal. B. Lateral. C. Axial. D. Ventral views.
FIGURE 12. Platytettix reticulatus Hancock, 1906 comb. rev. Female habitus A. Lateral and B. Dorsal views. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 13. Platytettix gibbinotus Bruner, 1910 comb. rev. Male lectotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral views. C. Frons. D. labels.
FIGURE 14. Platytettix arcuatus Bruner, 1920 comb. rev. Female holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral and dorsal views respectively. C. Frons. D. labels.
FIGURE 15. Platytettix arcuatus Bruner, 1920 comb. rev. Male habitus A. Lateral and B. Dorsal views.
FIGURE 16. Platytettix arcuatus Bruner, 1920 comb. rev. Male. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur.
FIGURE 17. Platytettix arcuatus Bruner, 1920 comb. rev. Female habitus A. Lateral and B. Dorsal views.
FIGURE 18. Platytettix arcuatus Bruner, 1920 comb. rev. Female A–B. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views. C–E. Terminalia in dorsal, lateral and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 19. Platytettix gibbosulus (Walker, 1871) comb. nov. Female holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral views. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 20. Platytettix gibbosulus (Walker, 1871) comb. nov. Female holotype. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Frons. C. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 21. Platytettix gibbosulus (Walker, 1871) comb. nov. Female habitus A. Lateral and B. Dorsal views.
MNCN |
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Metrodora rana
Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J., Quintana-Arias, Ronald Fernando, Infante, Ivette Coque, Silva, Daniela Santos Martins & Tavares, Gustavo Costa 2025 |
Metrodora
Gunther, K. 1939: 292 |
Metrodora
Gunther, K. 1939: 292 |
Platytettix
Hancock, J. L. 1906: 88 |
Tylotettix
Morse, A. P. 1900: 6 |
Metrodora rana
Bolivar, I. 1887: 248 |