Probolomyrmex Mayr, 1901
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.61.7634 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8F1433EB-EF78-4277-B0B6-CF4E227D4642 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/53AB8792-26D6-B880-8DCA-5C1FCED7A209 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Probolomyrmex Mayr |
status |
|
Genus Probolomyrmex Mayr View in CoL
Probolomyrmex Mayr 1901: 2. Type species: Probolomyrmex filiformis Mayr, by monotypy.
Escherichia Forel 1910: 245. Type species: Escherichia brevirostris Forel, by monotypy. [synonymised by Taylor 1965: 346]
Notes.
Detailed diagnoses were given by Taylor (1965), Bolton (2003), Eguchi et al. (2006), and Keller (2011). The material from Madagascar treated herein matches them almost perfectly with one exception. The lack of any sutures or grooves on the mesosoma of Probolomyrmex is a widely accepted genus-specific character, but we observed the presence of a small but noticeable metanotal groove in two of the three Malagasy species. Probolomyrmex ants are always easily recognisable from other ants on the basis of their long and slender bodies, almost complete lack of pilosity, the long sting, and especially the frontoclypeal shelf bearing the antennal insertions ( Taylor 1965, Agosti 1994). Taylor (1965) pointed out that the structural reduction in Probolomyrmex is extreme, which leaves only a few, useful diagnostic characters, such as dimensions and proportions of head, antennae, petiole, as well as surface sculpture. Based on the material from Madagascar, however, we do not consider surface sculpture to be too important for species diagnostics. We observed some noticeable variation within species. Consequently, we tried to avoid using surface sculpture as primary diagnostic character, and used it only as supporting character.
All three species treated in this study are placed in the Probolomyrmex greavesi species group sensu Eguchi et al. (2006), mostly on the basis of the well-developed ventral process. The two species groups hypothesised by Eguchi et al. (2006) work very well for the Oriental and Indo-Australian regions, and there is no reason to create a new group for the three species from Madagascar. As already pointed out by Fisher (2007) for Probolomyrmex tani , the Afrotropical species, which can also be placed in the Probolomyrmex greavesi species group, appear morphologically close to the three species from Madagascar suggesting a close relationship. At the moment however, it is not possible to assess the phylogenetic relationships of the Malagasy species with the species from other regions in a comprehensive way due to the high morphological uniformity and lack of diagnostic characters. A highly desirable multi-gene molecular phylogenetic analysis might provide insights into the subgeneric relationships within Probolomyrmex .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Probolomyrmex Mayr
Hita Garcia, Francisco & Fisher, Brian L. 2014 |
Escherichia brevirostris
Forel 1910 |
Probolomyrmex
Mayr 1901 |
Probolomyrmex filiformis
Mayr 1901 |