Antepipona rufescens ( Smith, 1857 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4150.5.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8C7D1E3C-FEDC-4D75-926B-7AE58E16766C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4499244 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5337E80A-FFB5-1A1C-C3AF-F894FE09165C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Antepipona rufescens ( Smith, 1857 ) |
status |
|
17. Antepipona rufescens ( Smith, 1857) View in CoL
( Figs 67–76 View FIGURES 67 – 72 View FIGURES 73 – 78. 73 – 76 )
Odynerus rufescens Smith 1857: 61 , ♀, “Ceram” (BMNH); de Saussure 1862: 199 (in subgenus Odynerus View in CoL division Epsilon View in CoL ; Celebes); Smith 1871: 376 (cat.); Dalla Torre 1894: 94 (cat.); 1904: 53 (in subgenus Hoplomerus View in CoL ; cat.).
Odynerus diffinis var. rufescens: Giordani Soika 1941: 263 (type? OUM; in subgenus Rhynchium View in CoL ).
Antepipona rufescens: Giordani Soika 1982: 205 View in CoL , 209 (key), 235, figs 37–39 (Celebes; Kangean; Ambon; Moluccas; Sumatra; Java; Burma; Malaysia); Giordani Soika 1986: 132 (China); Gusenleitner 1988: 180 (Thailand); Giordani Soika 1993: 154 (compared to A. shantungensis View in CoL n. sp.); Madl 1995: 398 (Thailand); Lambert 2004: 557 (key); Gusenleitner 2011: 1360 View Cited Treatment (Laos); Nugroho et al. 2012: 80 (list).
Diagnosis. ♀ ( Figs 67–71 View FIGURES 67 – 72 ). S2 not abruptly lowered at base, sides slightly convex; mesopleuron closely punctate, interspaces carinate; posterior side of propodeum without carinae; apex of clypeus strongly emarginated, with apical teeth less acute ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 67 – 72 ); metanotal teeth longer, more acute; body black with yellow and reddish brown markings ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 67 – 72 ).
Colour. Body black with yellow and reddish brown markings. Yellow markings: mandible except basal black and apical reddish brown; clypeus; V–shaped mark on front, often joining with extensions of bands that run along inner orbit, exceeding little above ocular sinus; large mark on temple towards vertex; scape except dorsal brown mark at apex; large band on pronotum; spot on mesepisternum; scutellum; metanotum; tegula; parategula; an apical band, wide in middle and narrow and short on sides, on T1; T2 with two large yellow spots at base and an apical band wider at middle and at sides; S2 with similar apical band; apical bands on T3–T5 and S3–S5. Flagellar segments usually yellow to yellowish brown, sometime black dorsally. Legs yellow to yellowish brown with coxae brown to black. Reddish brown markings: propodeum; most of T1. In some specimens, reddish brown colour more extensive and mixed with yellow markings on mesosoma and metasoma.
Ƌ. Apical antennal article almost reaching up to middle of 10th article ( Fig 73 View FIGURES 73 – 78. 73 – 76 ). Colour similar to that of ♀ except mandible almost entirely yellow except at teeth; interantennal space yellow; yellow mark on front broader.
Size (H+M+T1+T2). Female, 8–9 mm; Male, 6.5– 8 mm.
Material examined. INDIA: Kerala , Kozhikode district, Nanminda , 1♀, 21.xii.2010, Coll. P. Girish Kumar, NZC No. 16293/H3 . Meghalaya, East Garo Hills district, Dainadubi , 1♀, 8–13.v.1979, Coll. S.B. Roy & Party, NZC No. 16294/H3 ; East Garo Hills district, Darugiri , 4Ƌ, 14–20.v.1979, Coll. S.B. Roy & Party, NZC Nos. 16295/H3–16298/H3 . Sikkim, exact collection locality unknown, 3♀, 2Ƌ, vii–ix.1897, Coll. Dudgeon, NZC Nos. 16299/H3–16303/H3 . Tripura, Gomati district, Udaipur , 1Ƌ, 14.v.1978, Coll. A. Issar, NZC No. 16304/H3 ; Khowai district, Teliamura , 2Ƌ, 20.v.1978, Coll. J.K. Jonathan & Party, NZC Nos. 16305/H3, 16306/H3 ; Dhalai district, Ambassa , 1♀, 1Ƌ, 25.v.1978, Coll. J.K. Jonathan & Party, NZC Nos. 16307/H3, 16308/H3 ; North Tripura district, Ananda Bazar , 1Ƌ, 26.v.1992, Coll. M. Sil & Party, NZC No. 16309/H3.
Distribution. * India: Kerala, Meghalaya, Sikkim, Tripura; China; Thailand; Myanmar; Laos; Malaysia; Indonesia: Java (including Kangean), Sumatra, Sulawesi, Moluccas.
Remarks. Giordani Soika, 1982, suggested that many previous workers misidentified this species as A. guttata diffinis (de Saussure) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Antepipona rufescens ( Smith, 1857 )
Kumar, Girish P., Carpenter, James M. & Sureshan, Pavittu M. 2016 |
Antepipona rufescens:
Nugroho 2012: 80 |
Gusenleitner 2011: 1360 |
Lambert 2004: 557 |
Madl 1995: 398 |
Giordani 1993: 154 |
Gusenleitner 1988: 180 |
Giordani 1986: 132 |
Giordani 1982: 205 |
Odynerus diffinis var. rufescens:
Giordani 1941: 263 |
Odynerus rufescens
Dalla 1894: 94 |
Smith 1871: 376 |
Saussure 1862: 199 |
Smith 1857: 61 |