Planolites Nicholson, 1873
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13190253 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/53058F04-FFDE-400F-FF41-F9AEFBC6FCFF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Planolites Nicholson, 1873 |
status |
|
Ichnogenus Planolites Nicholson, 1873
Planolites isp.
Material: Many specimens observed in the background mudstone beds as full reliefs ( Fig. 4g View Fig ); few specimens on the lower surface of plan-parallel laminated or ripple cross laminated sandstone beds as positive hyporeliefs ( R 6, Fig. 4h View Fig ).
Description: subcylindrical unbranched burrow, horizontal to subhorizontal, straight to slightly curved, occasionally overlapping one another ( Fig. 4h View Fig ). The infilling contrasts with the surrounding matrix by color, texture, and composition. In some cases it reveals rusty ( Fig. 4i View Fig ) or black ( Fig. 4j View Fig ) infill color. The unbranched cylinder is less than 1.5 cm, rarely 2 cm in diameter ( Fig. 4j View Fig ), while the length does not exceed 15 cm. In several whitish-gray mudstone beds Chondrites co-occurs with and horizontal flattened galleries of Planolites isp., which are largely curved, 0.7 cm wide and 8 cm long, darker than the host deposit ( Fig. 4f View Fig ).
Remarks: Planolites is most likely a tunnel produced by deposit feeding worms, which actively back-filled with biologically processed sediment Häntzschel (1975). The author noticed that Planolites is quite easily confused with Palaeophycus due to striking external morphological resemblance, the difference being based on the type of filling. The rusty infilling of a Planolites is a good example of color contrast which might result either from the limonitization of sediment bypassed trough the tracemaker gut or from sediment sorting resulted from selective feeding ( Pemberton & Frey, 1982). The transversal fine ornamentation noted on some specimens ( Fig. 4k View Fig ) would demonstrate the back-filling activity ( Häntzschel, 1975). The flattened endichnial Planolites is the result of compaction. Calculating a:b ratio (a = 0.7 cm; b = 0.2 cm), the obtained 3.5 value suggests a fluid to soft substrate consistency at colonization time ( Wetzel & Aigner, 1986, Schieber, 2003).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.