Microporella verrucosa (Peach, 1868)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1053.65324 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E67F6F86-686D-44AC-9105-37FF58BC2183 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/51F39AB3-0418-5A95-A2A0-AE1A1529BDFC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Microporella verrucosa (Peach, 1868) |
status |
|
Microporella verrucosa (Peach, 1868) View in CoL
Figs 10 View Figure 10 , 11 View Figure 11
Eschara verrucosa Peach, 1868: 116.
Diporula verrucosa (Peach): Hincks, 1880: 220, pl. 31, figs 1, 2; Gautier, 1962: 176; Zabala, 1986: 501, fig. 174, pl. 15A, B; Hayward and Ryland, 1979: 226, fig. 97; Hayward and Ryland, 1999: 302, figs 138C, D, 139; André et al. 2014: 225, 5 figs; Rosso et al. 2014: table 2, fig. 3A-C.
Microporella (Diporula) verrucosa (Peach): Neviani, 1896a: 105; 1896b: 24.
Examined material.
Italy • 2 colonies and 10 fragments (living), 17 colonies and 62 fragments (dead), some very large, some regenerated and twisted; Ionian Sea, SE Sicily, Ciclopi Islands MPA; Ciclopi 2000 cruise; samples 2G, 3H, 4E, 6H, 8F, 8H, 8I, 9G, 10G, 12E, 12F, 12G, 13H, 14G; 37°32'39"- 37°34'31"N, 15°8'58"- 15°11'1"E; 63-92.5 m; Jul. 2000; A. Rosso leg.; dredging; C, DC, DE, and DL Biocoenoses; PMC. Rosso Collection I.H. B-17a. Italy • 11 living and 33 dead colonies/large fragments, 1 dead colony including the base; off Acitrezza; sample AC/L, AC/1B; coordinates unknown; 50 and 110 m; 1980; I. Di Geronimo leg.; dredging; pre-Coralligenous and DL Biocoenoses; PMC. Rosso Collection I.H. B-17a1. Italy • 12 living and 315 dead colonies/fragments; Ionian Sea, Gulf of Noto; 36°41'45"- 36°57'47"N, 15°8'35"- 15°20'00"E; PS/81 cruise; samples 2C, 4X, 9D (living) and samples 2B, 2C, 2XA, 2XB, 4C, 4C1, 4X, 6D, 9C, 9D, 10C, 11E (dead); Jul. 1981; I. Di Geronimo leg.; dredging; DC and DL Biocoenoses; and 11 living colonies; Noto 1996 cruise; samples 8I, 10G, 10H; 77-82 m; 1996; E. Mollica leg.; dredging; DE and DL Biocoenoses; PMC. Rosso Collection I.H. B-17b GoogleMaps . Italy • 18 dead colonies; Ionian Sea, Gulf of Catania ; sample LCT69; 37°18'42"N, 15°14'24"E; 90 m; Jul. 1980; I. Di Geronimo leg.; dredging; DL Biocoenosis; PMC. Rosso Collection I.H. B-17c GoogleMaps . Italy • 4 dead colonies; Ionian Sea, Gulf of Taranto, Amendolara Bank ; samples 1D and 5D; 39°51'42"- 39°52'54"N, 16°42'00"- 16°43'24"E; 30-40 m; Jun. 1991; R. Sanfilippo leg.; dredging; DC Biocoenosis; PMC. Rosso Collection I.H. B- 17g GoogleMaps . Italy • 77 dead colonies and fragments; southern Tyrrhenian Sea, SW Ustica, Apollo Bank ; 38°42'19"N, 13°7'58"E; 60 m; Jun. 1986, dredging; Laminaria rodriguezii Bornet, 1888 seagrass and associated DC Biocoenosis; PMC. Rosso Collection I.H. B-17d GoogleMaps . Italy • 2 living colonies; Messina Strait ; coordinates unknown; 65 m; 1990; S. Giacobbe leg.; dredging; no Biocoenosis information; PMC. Rosso Collection I.H. B- 17g . France • 50 dead colonies; Iberian-Provençal Basin , Corsica, off Calvì; sample CL74; 42°47'31"N, 9°8'10"E; 150- 110 m; G. Fredj leg.; dredging; DL Biocoenosis; PMC. Rosso Collection F.H. B-17e GoogleMaps . Greece • 4 dead colonies, Aegean Sea, Lesvos Island, Agios Vasilios cave ; samples AV1 and AV2; 38°58'8"N, 26°32'28"E; 30 m; V. Gerovasileiou leg.; scuba diving; GSO and GO Biocoenoses; PMC. Rosso Collection GR.H. B- 17f. GoogleMaps
Description.
Colony erect, rigid, branched, with a limited number of relatively spaced-out bifurcations, a few cm long, raising from an encrusting basal portion (Fig. 10A View Figure 10 ), extending up to 3 mm around the main stem.
Branches cylindrical, often flattened at bifurcations (Fig. 10C, E View Figure 10 ), consisting of 9-16 longitudinal rows of zooids, alternating very regularly to simulate an helicoidal pattern; branch diameter 10-15 mm (exceptionally up to 20 mm), becoming thicker and stouter in older portions of the colony, near the encrusting base, owing to secondary calcification.
Encrusting base unilaminar, multiserial (Fig. 10A View Figure 10 ), formed by autozooids similar to those of the erect branches (Fig. 10B View Figure 10 ) but with a greater number of oral spines (5-7, commonly six) and, subordinately, autozooids with occluded orifices (not functional) and/or kenozooids, often bearing an adventitious avicularium as those associated with autozooids. Interzooidal communications via basal pore-chambers in the encrusting portion (see Rosso et al. 2014: fig. 3A) and via multiporous septula in the erect branches (Fig. 10C View Figure 10 ).
Autozooids rounded hexagonal to lozenge-shaped, 477-779 (661 ± 93, N = 18) × 389-615 (493 ± 68, N = 18) μm (mean L/W = 1.34), distinct, interzooidal boundaries marked by narrow, shallow, locally undulate grooves (Fig. 11A, B, D View Figure 11 ). Frontal shield nearly flat, finely granular, and pseudoporous; about 10 marginal areolae distinguishable from frontal pseudopores only in early ontogeny because larger, subcircular to elongate elliptical, 25-65 μm long; 19-26 subcircular pseudopores, 20-30 μm in diameter, placed centrally on the frontal (Fig. 11A, B, D View Figure 11 ). Transverse section of the branch showing thick frontal and vertical walls, converging towards the centre of the branch, forming wedge-like polypide cavities (Fig. 10E, F View Figure 10 ).
Primary orifice approximately semi-circular to horseshoe-shaped, 130-151 (143 ± 6, N = 10) × 145-177 (161 ± 10, N = 10) μm (mean OL/OW = 0.89; mean ZL/OL = 4.63), outlined by a thin and smooth raised rim (Fig. 11C View Figure 11 ); hinge-line smooth, straight to slightly concave with two short, blunt lateral condyles and a smooth, proximal shelf sloping outwards; distal margin of the orifice corrugated because of a deeply placed, drawstring-like, arched rim seemingly functioning as support for the closed operculum. Oral spines four, occasionally five, thin (base diameter 15-20 μm), relatively short (60-90 µm), placed distally, often detached (Fig. 11A, B, D View Figure 11 ).
Ascopore field a narrow, reniform to U-shaped rim of smooth gymnocystal calcification, 50-60 × 57-80 µm, placed 65-80 μm below the orifice, same level as the orifice and the adjacent frontal shield; ascopore opening transversely C-shaped, 40-63 × 5-12 μm, with a massive, upside-down mushroom-shaped tongue projecting from distal edge with radial spines (Fig. 11A, B View Figure 11 ).
A single, constant, large avicularium, 121-156 (142 ± 9, N = 20) × 119-139 (130 ± 7, N = 20) μm (mean AvL/AvW = 1.09), located laterally, on either side, at about half zooidal length (Figs 10B, C View Figure 10 , 11A, B, D, F View Figure 11 ); crossbar complete; rostrum short, rounded triangular, channelled, directed laterally or less often distolaterally and slightly upward. Mandible 142-273 μm long, with a pointed, hooked tip, toothed at the level of the rostrum tip, lining proximally to the ascopore when open (Fig. 11F View Figure 11 ).
Ovicell non-personate, subglobular, prominent, large, 250-327 (286 ± 36, N = 4) × 384-430 (402 ± 20, N = 4) μm (mean OvL/OvW = 0.71), formed by the distal autozooid, obscuring half of the zooidal orifice; calcification fabric similar to frontal shield but with larger and more prominent tubercles, and smaller (15-20 μm in diameter), more closely spaced pseudopores, seemingly radially aligned with rows separated by raised ridges; a discontinuous, peripheral row of larger pseudopores sometimes present (Figs 10C View Figure 10 , 11B, E View Figure 11 ).
Ancestrula tatiform (Fig. 10A, B View Figure 10 ), oval (220 × 150 μm), gymnocyst concealed, cryptocyst smooth, narrowing distally; opesia oval (160 × 110 μm); only four, distal spines visible on the single ancestrula observed. Ancestrula budding two distolateral autozooids, and subsequently surrounded by two lateral and one proximal autozooids.
Older colony parts thickly calcified owing to secondary calcification progressively obliterating zooidal openings including orifices, ascopores and avicularia (Fig. 10D View Figure 10 ), making difficult the distinction between old autozooids and genuine kenozooids that probably also develop.
Remarks.
First assigned to Eschara ( Peach 1868), Eschara verrucosa served as the type species of the genus Diporula Hincks, 1879 in which it has been included since then with the exception of Neviani (1896a, b). Characters used to distinguish Diporula from Microporella included the "dendroid zoarium with cylindrical branches" and the morphology of the orifice described as "expanded above, contracted below, and slightly constricted by lateral projections (horseshoe-shaped)" ( Hincks 1880: 220; and similar description in Gautier 1962: 176). However, both characters seem feeble to justify the distinction between the two genera. At least nine species of Microporella possess erect colony-growth, starting with a more or less developed encrusting portion as does Diporula . Also the shape of the orifice in Microporella species is highly variable ( Di Martino et al. 2020a), with several examples of species having orifices with the proximal margins narrower than the orifice maximum width [e.g., Microporella curta Almeida, Souza, Mengola & Vieira, 2017 from Brazil, Microporella franklini (Soule, Chaney & Morris, 2003) from California, the Mediterranean Microporella genisii (Audouin & Savigny, 1826), Microporella hastingsae Harmelin, Ostrovsky, Cáceres-Chamizo & Sanner, 2011 from the Red Sea, and the Arctic Microporella klugei Kukliński & Taylor, 2008].
Further differences between Microporella and Diporula were highlighted by Hayward and Ryland (1999: 292, 312), including interzooidal communications via basal pore-chambers in the former genus and multiporous septula in the latter, and the presence of pseudopores in the ovicells of Diporula . However, multiporous septula were observed, for example, in Microporella ordo (see Di Martino et al. 2020a: fig. 7D), and basal pore-chambers were observed in the encrusting portions of M. verrucosa , while pseudopores occur in the ooecium of many Microporella species including the type M. ciliata (see Kukliński and Taylor 2008: fig. 1c). A further presumed difference relates to the ooecium porosity, with Diporula reported as having a fully perforated endooecium and Microporella species usually described as having only pits in the endooecium ( Harmelin et al. 2011: 2; Ostrovsky 2013: figs 2.43B-D, 2.44A). However, pores clearly perforate the endooecium also in Microporella as seen in broken ooecia of M. ichnusae sp. nov. (Fig. 6B View Figure 6 )
Based on these observations, here we propose Diporula as junior synonym of Microporella and resurrect the combination Microporella verrucosa first proposed by Neviani (1896a, b). Specimens of a second species of Diporula , D. coronula Ortmann, 1890 need re-examination. Based on the original description and illustration ( Ortmann 1890: 39, pl. 3, fig. 7), this species has a lepralioid orifice with condyles at about one-third of the orifice length, a single avicularium with spathulate mandible, and up to two frontal foramina, characters reminiscent of other cheilostome genera such as, for example, Poricella Canu, 1904.
Specimens originally described as Eschara lunaris Waters, 1878, from Pleistocene sediment of eastern Sicily and synonymised with M. verrucosa by Hincks (1880) need to be re-examined as well to confirm their conspecificity, but this is out of the scope of the present paper.
The rugose appearance observed by Peach (1868) and Hincks (1880), which inspired the species name, was not observed in our material, although secondary calcification is always very common in older parts of the colony. Intramural budding is rare and restricted to avicularia, while branch regeneration is common, apparently following breakage as indicated by broken autozooids with sharp edges. We also observed zooids with reverse polarity, sometimes budded from old stems with autozooids obliterated by secondary calcification. However, in these instances few whorls of autozooids usually develop from the regeneration surface, with only few tips appearing actively growing. Colony fragments longer than 2 cm can appear twisted, a morphology observed in some cyclostomes ( Harmelin 1976) and other erect cheilostomes from the Gulf of Noto and the Ciclopi MPA area ( Rosso 1989). This twisted branch morphology and the ability to regenerate after breakage might represent the adaptation of this species to colonize soft sediment bottoms. Basal, encrusting colony portions are relatively common in our samples and show that the ancestrulae settled on clasts ranging from a few mm to 1-2 cm in size. The ability of this species to encrust small particles, in addition to large substrates in rocky habitats, was suggested by Gautier (1962) after finding only colony fragments in dredges from sandy-muddy bottoms.
The diagnostic characters of this species seem constant in the Mediterranean specimens, except for the size of the ascopore related to the development of the distal tongue sometimes leaving only a fissure-like opening. Paired avicularia were observed only in one autozooid (Fig. 11E View Figure 11 ). Higher variability is observed when comparing the Mediterranean specimens with those from the Atlantic (e.g., Hayward and Ryland 1999: 302, figs 138C, D, 139A, B; unpublished SEM images provided by P.D. Taylor from Mauritania and Madeira) related to the ascopore shape, the size of the spines, and the distribution and size of pseudopores on the frontal shield, suggesting the existence of a species complex.
Distribution and ecology.
Microporella verrucosa is a warm-temperate species with Atlanto-Mediterranean distribution. In the Atlantic, it has been reported from West Africa to the southwest of the British Isles ( Hayward and Ryland 1999); in the Mediterranean, it occurs preferentially in mid- and outer-shelf habitats below 50-60 m depth, with an optimum at 70-120 m ( Gautier 1962; Zabala 1986; Rosso 1989, 1996a; Rosso and Di Martino 2016), but it was also observed at shallower depths (20 m) in a shadowed open cave in Catalonia ( André et al. 2014). It is associated with shadowed rocky habitats, including the Coralligenous and Semi-Dark and Dark Cave Biocoenoses, and detritic habitats, such as the Coastal Detritic and the Offshore Detritic Biocoenoses (Table 1 View Table 1 ; Gautier 1962; Harmelin 1969, 1976; Zabala 1986; Rosso 1989, 1996a, 1996b; Di Geronimo et al. 1990; Madurell et al. 2013; Rosso et al. 2014, 2019b; Gerovasileiou and Rosso 2016). However, it is never very common or dominant at sample or habitat scale, occurring only with a few colonies per sample and/or in one out of four or five sampling stations (Table 1 View Table 1 ; see also Harmelin 1976: tables 1, 3).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Schizoporelloidea |
Family |
|
Genus |